Home Blog Page 25

Rayls Launches Open-Source Private Blockchain Infrastructure for Banks

0

  • Rayls launched Rayls Sovereign, an open-source, EVM-compatible blockchain platform for banks, financial market infrastructures and regulated institutions.
  • Institutions get their own private blockchain environment, retaining control over sensitive data, security and governance.

Rayls has launched an open-source blockchain platform aimed at solving a persistent problem for banks moving assets onchain: how to keep sensitive financial activity private without becoming isolated from public blockchain markets.

The platform, called Rayls Sovereign, gives banks, financial market infrastructures and other regulated institutions their own EVM-compatible blockchain environment. Institutions retain control over infrastructure, data and governance while maintaining connections to permissioned networks and public chains.

Rayls unveiled the system at FEBRABAN TECH 2026 in São Paulo on Aug. 25.

The launch expands technology that Rayls says is already deployed across more than 30 financial institutions, moving the company from institution-specific blockchain deployments toward infrastructure that banks can install and operate themselves.

Banks Get Their Own Blockchain

Rayls Sovereign runs within a financial institution’s existing technology environment rather than requiring it to conduct all activity on a shared public ledger.

That allows a bank to keep confidential information — including client data, balances and trading activity — inside its own infrastructure. Only information or cryptographic proofs required to complete an external transaction need to be shared.

At the same time, the institution can connect its private environment to other networks and wider onchain markets.

That architecture targets a long-standing trade-off in institutional blockchain adoption. Private networks give banks greater confidentiality and control, but can fragment assets and liquidity, while public blockchains offer wider connectivity but create challenges around privacy and governance.

Rayls’ existing architecture has been built around connecting institution-controlled private environments with broader blockchain networks, allowing assets to move between regulated systems and public infrastructure. Rayls has also said institutions including XP, Núclea, AmFi and Nimofast are expected to bring assets from private networks onto its public chain as its mainnet develops.

“Financial institutions need a secure and practical way to bring assets and financial processes onchain while maintaining control over their data, systems and governance,” Marcos Viriato, CEO of Parfin and core developer of Rayls, said in a statement shared with AlexaBlockchain.

“Rayls Sovereign gives each institution its own environment for onchain operations, with the connectivity needed to transact across wider markets without forcing institutions to compromise on privacy or control,” Marcos added.

Rayls Points to Production Use, Not Just Pilots

The more significant part of the launch is that Rayls is building Sovereign on technology that is already being used for financial products.

XP Inc. launched its USDXP stablecoin on Rayls infrastructure in March 2026 through its Clear Corretora subsidiary. Rayls described USDXP as a fully backed U.S. dollar stablecoin running as a production deployment rather than a proof of concept.

Rayls subsequently said about $300 million of USDXP was issued during its first week. The stablecoin initially operates within an XP-controlled private environment, with Rayls planning connectivity to its public chain and other stablecoins.

“USDXP proved that institutional-grade digital assets can run in production without compromising control or compliance,” Marcos Horie, head of digital assets at XP Inc., said in the announcement.

“Rayls Sovereign extends that same principle further, giving highly regulated institutions like ours a dedicated environment to continue building.”

Núclea, a major Brazilian financial-market infrastructure provider, is another important reference point.

Rayls says Núclea is using its infrastructure to tokenize roughly 40,000 assets a month. Rayls has also identified Núclea as one of the institutional asset providers expected to begin bringing assets from private networks to its public blockchain during 2026.

Nimofast Global, meanwhile, is targeting as much as $100 billion in tokenized receivables and other real-world assets on Rayls, according to Rayls. The figure represents a target rather than assets already tokenized.

More From AlexaBlockchain

Why Does The Launch Of Rayls Sovereign Matter?

The bigger contest in institutional blockchain is increasingly about architecture rather than whether banks will experiment with tokenization.

Banks want programmable assets, faster settlement and access to blockchain-based liquidity. They also require confidentiality, permissioning, audit controls and the ability to determine where sensitive financial information is stored.

Rayls is effectively arguing that institutions should not have to choose between those two models.

A bank could, for example, issue a tokenized deposit or stablecoin inside its private environment, apply its own compliance and governance rules, and later connect that asset with external counterparties or public markets without putting its full internal ledger on a public blockchain.

That could become more important as banks move beyond tokenization pilots toward products that need distribution and secondary-market liquidity.

The U.S. regulatory environment is also becoming clearer for some digital-asset activities.

President Donald Trump signed the GENIUS Act into law on July 18, 2025, establishing a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, including reserve, disclosure and compliance requirements.

The broader CLARITY Act remains unresolved. The U.S. Senate advanced procedural work around the legislation in August, but a key vote was pushed into September and the bill continues to face disagreements over issues including stablecoin rewards, anti-money-laundering safeguards and restrictions involving government officials.

President Trump again urged Congress to pass the legislation at a White House event on Aug. 19. The bill seeks to provide broader rules for digital assets and clarify regulatory responsibilities, but it remained stalled in the Senate.

The combination of clearer stablecoin rules and continued debate over market structure increases the incentive for banks to build blockchain systems that can operate within conventional regulatory controls.

Wall Street Is Moving Toward Similar Hybrid Models

Rayls is not alone in trying to combine institutional privacy with blockchain interoperability.

Canton Network has pursued a similar problem from a capital-markets perspective, building infrastructure in which separate financial applications can interact while information remains visible only to parties entitled to see it.

A six-week Canton pilot involving 45 financial institutions and market participants tested how permissioned blockchain applications could transact with each other while maintaining privacy and regulatory controls. Participants included BNY Mellon, Goldman Sachs, BNP Paribas, Cboe Global Markets, DTCC, State Street, Standard Chartered and Visa.

The Canton ecosystem has since moved beyond pilots in some areas.

Broadridge’s Distributed Ledger Repo platform, which operates within the Canton ecosystem, has handled about $1.5 trillion in monthly repo volumes, according to a Canton report. That provides one example of distributed-ledger infrastructure reaching material scale in an institutional market rather than remaining confined to experimental tokenization projects.

Those efforts point toward a similar conclusion: regulated institutions increasingly want interoperable blockchain infrastructure without making all financial data public.

The key difference is how individual platforms implement that model. Rayls is emphasizing institution-controlled private chains that can connect outward, while Canton has focused on interoperable applications operating with need-to-know privacy across a shared institutional network.

Rayls Sovereign Can Process 15,000+ Transactions Per Second

Rayls says Sovereign can process over 15,000 transactions per second with settlement finality in under one second.

The company is positioning that capacity for workloads including high-volume payments, atomic delivery-versus-payment transactions and post-trade processing.

Blockchain throughput figures, however, are difficult to compare directly. Results can vary substantially depending on transaction complexity, hardware, validator configuration and whether tests reflect a live distributed environment.

The core Rayls Sovereign platform is being released as open-source software, giving institutions the ability to inspect, test and deploy the infrastructure rather than relying entirely on proprietary technology.

Rayls will also offer additional commercial components.

Those include Axyl, its performance infrastructure, and Enygma, a privacy layer designed to use technologies including zero-knowledge proofs to protect sensitive information while allowing transactions to be verified.

The above article “Rayls Launches Open-Source Private Blockchain Infrastructure for Banks” was first published on AlexaBlockchain. Read the complete article here: https://alexablockchain.com/rayls-launches-open-source-private-blockchain-infrastructure-for-banks/

Read Also: This is the First U.S.-Chartered Depository Bank to Offer Stablecoin Invoicing

Disclaimer: The information provided on AlexaBlockchain is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read complete disclaimer here.

LayerZero unveils trading infrastructure for crypto and tokenized markets, ZRO surges

0

The trading infrastructure runs on LayerZero’s Zero blockchain, backed by Citadel Securities with DTCC and ICE exploring institutional market applications.

Glamsterdam Repricing Impact for Smart Contract Developers

0

TL;DR:

  • The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade includes a set of gas repricings. EIP-8037 and EIP-8038 (both scheduled for inclusion) adjust the cost of creating and accessing state so that gas prices more accurately track the real work each operation takes.
  • Replaying historical mainnet transactions under the new schedule shows that a small set of smart contracts rely on assumptions the new schedule shifts, which may lead to these contracts breaking or degrading without preventative updates.
  • Most flagged issues are fixed with a gas-limit increase, and the large majority of smart contracts are unaffected. Direct outreach to the most-affected builders is already underway.
  • Check whether your L1 smart contract will be affected at ethereum.github.io/repricing-impact/ and test fixes on the Platåberget testnet (glam-devnet-8).

Background

Two EIPs implement the repricing, adjusting the cost of creating and accessing state so that gas prices more accurately track the real work each operation takes:

  • EIP-8037 increases and harmonizes the cost of creating new state (new accounts, new storage slots, deployed bytecode) and meters it separately, keeping state growth sustainable as gas limits rise.
  • EIP-8038 increases the cost of accessing state (SSTORE, SLOAD, cold account access, EXTCODESIZE/EXTCODECOPY) to reflect the measured performance of these operations on today’s state size.

Gas prices for state operations were last adjusted in the Berlin fork in 2021. Since then, Ethereum’s state has grown significantly, and the recent gas limit increases have accelerated that growth.

Repricing these operations to reflect their actual cost is a prerequisite for raising the gas limit further. The new schedule is derived from a performance target that supports roughly a 3x increase in base throughput.

Impact

To understand the real-world impact, we replayed historical mainnet transactions under the new schedule and analyzed what actually diverges. Every transaction falls into one of four practical outcomes:

  • No change: Identical outcome and execution. The large majority of transactions fall here.
  • Succeeds with changes: Still succeeds, but gas used or another detail differs.
  • Fixable with a gas-limit increase: Runs out of gas at its original limit but completes with a higher one. Fixed with a gas-limit increase.
  • Potentially broken: Fails even with a substantially raised gas limit.

Contracts in the last group typically rely on hardcoded gas assumptions, such as fixed stipends (Solidity’s transfer/send 2,300 gas), hardcoded gas values in calls, logic that branches on gasleft(), or presigned transactions with fixed gas limits. Direct outreach to the most-affected builders is already underway.

Actionable changes

If you maintain L1 contracts, you can check whether a contract may be affected by pasting the contract address into the affected-contracts search here. Affected contracts are shown with their distinct failure modes and the specific repricing driving each one.

  • If your contract is fixable with a gas-limit increase, update the gas limits your frontend, infra, or users supply.
  • If your contract is potentially broken, review the flagged call sites and test your fix. The Platåberget testnet (glam-devnet-8) runs the new schedule and is available now for testing.
  • Even if your contract is not listed, review any code that hardcodes gas values or branches on remaining gas.

If you build wallets, RPC infrastructure, or node tooling, update gas estimation for the new schedule. Both EIPs require eth_estimateGas and related handling to account for the new cost rules, and cached gas constants will underestimate and lead to failed transactions.

If you are a regular user, no action is needed. Updated wallets and infrastructure handle these changes.

A report of the most-affected entities has been compiled, and direct outreach to those teams is already underway.

Outlook

These repricings exist to keep Ethereum scaling safely. Gas that reflects real resource costs allows block gas limits to keep rising without degrading the network for node operators. The repricing schedule is live on devnets now and will roll out to public testnets ahead of mainnet activation. Teams are strongly encouraged to test before then.

As with previous upgrades, changes that impact users will be communicated proactively via this blog and community channels. You can also reach out in the Ethereum R&D Discord server (evm-pricing channel) or the corresponding Telegram group. Teams that depend closely on the protocol roadmap are encouraged to follow the ACD process and the discussion threads for EIP-8037 and EIP-8038, where questions are welcome.

Crypto custody firm Copper has potential buyers. But offers are way below its $500 million asking price

0

Once valued at $2.5 billion, Copper was being marketed by investment bank Cantor Fitzgerald at around $500 million in May this year.

US Targets Iran Crypto Sector Over $100M Oil Payments

0

The US Treasury has expanded its Iran sanctions framework to cover the country’s digital asset sector, citing more than $100 million in crypto payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales. 

On Monday, the Treasury said the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued sectoral sanctions determinations covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation and shipping. The agency also sanctioned nearly 60 entities, individuals and vessels across nuclear, missile, cyber and oil networks.

The digital asset determination allows OFAC to sanction foreign individuals and companies that operate in or provide services supporting Iran’s digital asset sector. The Treasury said Iran increasingly uses crypto as a “tool of choice for sanctions evasion,” including for transactions linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and government insiders. 

It alleged that UAE-based Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov processed over $100 million in crypto payments since 2023 to facilitate oil sales on behalf of the IRGC’s Quds Force. OFAC sanctioned Obukhov and his UAE-based company, Foscom FZE.

US widens crypto enforcement against Iran 

The sector-wide measure follows a series of US actions against named crypto exchanges and wallets linked to Iran. In January, OFAC sanctioned UK-registered Zedcex and Zedxion, marking its first Iran-related designations of digital asset exchanges.

On June 3, the Treasury sanctioned four Iranian crypto exchanges, including the country’s largest platform, Nobitex. The action came days after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the US had seized nearly $1 billion in cryptocurrency from Iranian exchanges and wallets.

Most recently, OFAC sanctioned exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether on Aug. 7, alleging they facilitated a combined $5 million in digital assets connected to Iran. 

Related: Iran-linked entities moved $3.8B through CoinEx, TRM says

Unlike the earlier actions against specific platforms, the latest determination provides a basis for sanctions based on participation in Iran’s wider digital asset sector. The Treasury said the determination “significantly expands” its ability to sanction foreign individuals and companies operating in or providing services supporting the covered sectors.

The accompanying OFAC determination states that any person determined to operate in Iran’s digital asset sector will be subject to sanctions under Executive Order 13902. 

The Treasury said designated parties’ US-linked property must be blocked, while foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them could face restrictions on access to US accounts. 

Magazine: MiCA cracks down on USDT in Europe… but no one else cares

tZERO Integrates Sui to Support Regulated Tokenized Securities

0

  • tZERO is integrating its regulated U.S. digital securities infrastructure with the Sui blockchain.
  • The integration will support the full tokenized-securities lifecycle, including issuance, transfer agency, custody, compliance, trading and settlement.

tZERO is integrating its regulated U.S. securities infrastructure with the Sui blockchain, giving issuers and developers on the network a pathway to issue, custody and trade tokenized securities.

The partnership will connect Sui to tZERO’s infrastructure for issuance, transfer agency, custody, compliance, secondary trading and settlement. For tZERO, the deal provides another route into blockchain-native markets and Sui’s developer ecosystem.

The integration comes as financial institutions increasingly look beyond simply putting assets on blockchains toward building regulated infrastructure capable of supporting the full lifecycle of digital securities.

More From AlexaBlockchain

Connecting Sui to regulated securities markets

The partnership effectively adds a regulated capital-markets layer to Sui.

Projects building tokenized securities on the network will be able to connect with tZERO’s U.S. market infrastructure rather than assembling separate providers for issuance, custody, transfer agency and secondary-market trading.

tZERO already provides infrastructure covering tokenization, primary issuance, secondary trading, custody, clearing, settlement and transfer-agent functions. Its regulated entities include tZERO Securities and tZERO Digital Asset Securities, both listed by FINRA among broker-dealers it regulates.

That distinction is noteworthy because putting securities on a public blockchain does not remove securities-law obligations.

Tokenization can change how ownership is recorded, transferred and settled. But issuers and intermediaries still have to address requirements around investor eligibility, custody, recordkeeping and secondary trading.

Mustafa Al Niama, Head of Capital Markets at Mysten Labs and former Americas Head of Digital Assets at Goldman Sachs, said the integration is intended to bridge those two environments.

“Institutional adoption of tokenized assets depends on infrastructure that bridges blockchain innovation with regulatory frameworks,” Al Niama said in a statement shared with AlexaBlockchain.

“tZERO’s expansion to Sui gives issuers and developers access to regulated issuance, custody, and trading capabilities designed to support that transition, while also taking advantage of Sui’s unique architecture that is built to support institutional workflows,” Al Niama added.

Why Sui’s architecture matters?

Sui differs from account-based blockchain systems through an object-centric architecture that treats assets and other pieces of state as individual programmable objects.

Each object can have its own identity, ownership and rules. The design also allows transactions involving independent objects to be processed separately rather than forcing all activity through the same shared state.

That structure could be relevant for regulated assets because ownership and permissions are particularly important when securities can only move between eligible participants.

Sui has positioned the object model, parallel execution and programmability as core advantages for financial applications and DeFi.

“Sui’s object-centric architecture offers a unique approach to regulated digital assets by making assets and their permissions programmable,” tZERO Chairman and CEO Alan Konevsky said.

“Combined with Sui’s performance, that design creates a strong foundation for the development of next generation regulated financial applications onchain,” Alan added.

Why Does It Matter?

The bottleneck in tokenization is increasingly moving beyond the act of creating a blockchain token.

For securities to operate at institutional scale, issuers also need compliance controls, custody, shareholder records, regulated trading venues and settlement infrastructure. Connecting those functions directly to blockchain ecosystems can reduce the number of separate systems a tokenization project has to assemble.

The tZERO-Sui partnership attempts to connect those two layers.

Sui developers gain access to regulated securities infrastructure, while tZERO gets closer to applications and liquidity already operating inside a DeFi network.

The latter could prove important.

Many tokenized securities have so far operated largely within controlled platforms. Connecting compliant securities infrastructure to blockchain-native developers could eventually make those assets easier to incorporate into broader onchain financial applications, subject to regulatory and contractual restrictions.

tZERO has been expanding this model

The Sui deal follows several moves by tZERO to position its platform as infrastructure that other financial firms can plug into.

In July, tZERO partnered with Dinari on an operating framework intended to let broker-dealers offer tokenized U.S. equities through a single integration covering trading, custody, clearing, settlement and asset servicing.

The company has also worked with Wall Street brokerage Siebert to provide infrastructure for entering tokenized securities without requiring the broker-dealer to build the entire regulatory and technology stack internally.

tZERO said that arrangement covers tokenization, issuance, trading, custody, clearing, settlement and transfer agency.

tZERO is simultaneously showing that securities can move from issuance into secondary trading on its platform.

Earlier this month, it opened its regulated alternative trading system to orders for a digital security linked to buybuy BABY intellectual property. The token had initially been issued through a Regulation Crowdfunding offering on tZERO in 2025.

tZERO also introduced a revamped platform in August that combines investor onboarding, primary offerings, secondary trading and custody within one interface.

Sui is also building institutional connections

The partnership is not Sui’s first attempt to bring traditional financial institutions closer to its ecosystem.

In November 2024, Sui announced a strategic partnership with Franklin Templeton Digital Assets focused on supporting builders and blockchain-based applications. The asset manager specifically highlighted DeFi infrastructure including DeepBook among projects within the ecosystem.

Franklin Templeton has since demonstrated that regulated assets issued using blockchain infrastructure can attract material assets and transaction activity.

Its Franklin OnChain U.S. Government Money Fund, represented through the BENJI token, had grown into a suite with about $1.98 billion in assets under management as of April 29. Peer-to-peer transfers had exceeded $211 million by March 31, according to the asset manager.

Tokenized finance is becoming multichain

The broader market is increasingly moving toward infrastructure that can operate across several blockchains rather than forcing issuers onto a single network.

BlackRock’s BUIDL fund, tokenized by Securitize, expanded to Solana in March 2025 after surpassing $1 billion in assets. That brought the fund to seven supported networks, including Ethereum, Aptos, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Optimism and Polygon.

Traditional market infrastructure is heading in the same direction.

DTCC said in July that it had converted securities held at the Depository Trust Company into tokens and processed them through production transactions involving collateral, securities lending, Treasury repo and equity settlement. More than 30 firms took part, including BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Citadel Securities and Nasdaq.

DTCC plans to launch the service in October and is pursuing a multichain strategy spanning private and public networks. Its industry working group had already grown beyond 50 financial and digital-asset firms earlier this year.

Those efforts differ in structure from the tZERO-Sui partnership, but they point toward the same shift.

Blockchain networks are increasingly competing not just for cryptocurrency activity, but for the infrastructure and developers that will support regulated financial assets.

The above article “tZERO Integrates Sui to Support Regulated Tokenized Securities” was first published on AlexaBlockchain. Read the complete article here: https://alexablockchain.com/tzero-integrates-sui-to-support-regulated-tokenized-securities/

Read Also: This is the First U.S.-Chartered Depository Bank to Offer Stablecoin Invoicing

Disclaimer: The information provided on AlexaBlockchain is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read complete disclaimer here.

Las Vegas businessman convicted in $24 million 'AI supercomputer' crypto Ponzi scheme

0

Brent Kovar has been found guilty of running a crypto Ponzi scheme, defrauding at least 400 investors out of $24 million.

Thailand SEC Seeks Feedback on Bitcoin and Ether ETF Rules

0

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has advanced its framework for locally listed spot Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from proposed principles to draft regulations while revising its approach to foreign digital asset custodians.

The regulator said Monday it is seeking feedback on two consultation papers. One contains draft regulations for Thai crypto ETFs, while the other proposes principles governing the qualifications of foreign digital asset custodians engaged by mutual and private funds investing in digital assets.

During the initial stage, asset managers could establish passive ETFs tracking Bitcoin (BTC) or Ether (ETH), the only two eligible crypto assets.

The draft regulations follow an April consultation on the framework’s broader principles. The SEC said most respondents supported the framework but provided feedback on custody arrangements, prompting the regulator to revise its proposed approach.

The framework forms part of Thailand’s ambition to become a global digital asset hub for institutions.

Bitcoin and Ether ETFs would trade on Thai stock exchange

Under the proposed rules, Bitcoin and Ether ETFs would trade exclusively on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). Each ETF would track a single crypto asset and would need to maintain average net exposure of at least 80% of its net asset value to that asset over each accounting year.

Related: Bitcoin ETF inflows hit $1.9B in strongest week since October 2025

The proposed rules would also allow mutual funds and private funds to invest in Thai-domiciled crypto ETFs, alongside foreign crypto ETFs in which they are already permitted to invest, subject to existing investment limits.

During the initial phase, however, the regulator would not allow alternative products tied to foreign crypto ETFs, including depositary receipts tracking them.

Thailand revises crypto custody proposal

The revised approach would retain onshore digital asset custodians as the primary providers for crypto ETFs during the initial phase.

“Under the revised approach, crypto ETFs will continue to be primarily required to use onshore DA [digital asset] custodians, while the SEC may permit the use of qualified foreign DA custodians when necessary and appropriate in light of prevailing circumstances,” the SEC said.

Under the separate custodian proposal, foreign providers serving mutual and private funds investing in digital assets would need to be supervised by a regulatory authority with legal powers. They would also have to operate under regulatory and investor asset protection standards that the Thai SEC considers adequate.

The SEC will accept public comments on both consultation papers until Sept. 20.

Magazine: Korean bank taps Ripple for payments, Pakistan opens crypto licensing: Asia Express

Treasury’s bond buyback plan fights the market and heightens the danger, billionaire Druckenmiller says

0

The billionaire investor argues the intervention removes a vital check on government borrowing and fiscal accountability while markets remain the better judge of prices.

CFTC, US soldier accused of illegal Polymarket bet spar over interpretation of prediction markets

0

A judge stayed the CFTC’s civil case against a soldier who allegedly used nonpublic information for a Polymarket bet, but the regulator is trying to weigh in on the criminal case.