The digital assets crowd has been complaining bitterly about bank-lobbyist tactics, but Senate lawmakers have a much longer relationship with their bankers.
Indian Crypto Exchanges Push for Tax Changes Ahead of Union Budget
India’s crypto industry is renewing calls for tax reform ahead of the country’s February Union Budget, arguing that the current framework is discouraging onshore activity as regulatory compliance requirements continue to tighten.
India’s current crypto tax framework, introduced in 2022, levies a flat 30% tax on crypto gains and applies a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on most transactions, whether they are profitable or not. At the moment, losses from trades can’t be used to offset gains.
Executives from major domestic exchanges say the existing tax regime, particularly transaction-level taxes and restrictions on loss setoffs, no longer reflects how the global digital asset market has evolved, nor India’s own progress in strengthening oversight and enforcement.
The renewed push comes as policymakers finalize fiscal priorities for the next financial year. The Union Budget of India, expected to be presented on Feb. 1, is widely seen as one of the few avenues through which meaningful tax recalibration can occur without new legislation.
Exchanges argue compliance is in place, tax friction remains
Exchanges argued that sustained pressure on compliant platforms risks pushing liquidity, users and innovation offshore, effectively undermining the oversight goals regulators are attempting to achieve.
In a statement sent to Cointelegraph, Nischal Shetty, founder of domestic exchange WazirX, said that India has an opportunity to refine its crypto framework in a way that balances enforcement with innovation.
“As India prepares for Budget 2026, there is a clear opportunity to fine-tune a framework which supports transparency and compliance while fostering innovation,” Shetty said.
Shetty argued that the current regime should be reassessed “in line with how Web3 has matured over the last couple of years globally,” citing increased institutional adoption and evolving regulations worldwide.
He said a calibrated reduction in transaction-level TDS and a review of loss off-set provisions could help restore onshore liquidity, improve compliance and ensure that more economic activity remains within India.
Raj Karkara, chief operating officer of Indian crypto exchange ZebPay, echoed similar views, calling the upcoming budget a “pivotal moment” for the sector.
“A rationalisation of the current 1% TDS on crypto transactions could meaningfully improve liquidity and encourage stronger onshore participation,” Karkara said, adding that a review of the flat 30% tax on crypto gains would create a more predictable investment environment.
SB Seker, the head of APAC at crypto exchange Binance, said the forthcoming budget presents a chance to recalibrate India’s crypto tax framework in line with growing retail participation.
He argued that a more pragmatic approach, which focuses on capital gains realized, with limited loss setoffs and the removal of transaction-level levies, would improve fairness for users and signal a move away from what he called a “tax-and-deter” regime.
“Clear, consistent operating standards for VDA platforms, aligned with India’s AML/KYC and investor protection priorities, will encourage responsible capital investment, create skilled jobs, and build domestic capabilities,” Seker added.
Related: India’s central bank urges countries to prioritize CBDCs over stablecoins
Industry calls for reforms amid tighter enforcement
The calls for tax reform come as crypto platforms face increasingly strict compliance requirements in India.
On Monday, India’s Financial Intelligence Unit introduced new Know Your Customer rules requiring exchanges to verify users through live selfie checks, geolocation and IP tracking, bank account verification and additional government-issued identification.
At the same time, tax authorities continued to voice concerns over the digital asset sector’s impact on enforcement.
On Jan. 8, officials from India’s Income Tax Department warned lawmakers that offshore exchanges, private wallets and decentralized finance tools complicate efforts to track taxable crypto income.
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
Saturn Raises $800k From YZi Labs And Sora Ventures To Build USDat, A 11%+ Yield-bearing Stablecoin Protocol Backed By Strategy’s Digital Credit
The Creation of Digital Credit
In 2025, Strategy and Michael Saylor set their sights on the fixed-income market. The company transformed Bitcoin into a durable source of yield, creating a credit layer on top of it.
“Our goal is to bring transparent yield to DeFi at a scale of billions of dollars. We are building the first application on Michael Saylor’s digital credit – a whole new platform layer, where banks, insurance, investing and money will be all reshaped,” said Kevin Li, Co-founder of Saturn. “We’re proud to have YZi Labs and Sora’s support from day one, and we will become the Tether of digital credit” Li added, “Today, yield is generated through a combination of Strategy’s STRC and U.S. Treasury bills.”
“Stablecoins are moving beyond simple payments toward yield-driven products, and few projects connect institutional credit with DeFi in a meaningful way,” said Jason Fang, Founder of Sora Ventures. “We backed Saturn because USDat is pioneering the first on-chain use of Strategy’s credit products, and we believe it can redefine how institutional capital interacts with decentralized finance.
The Saturn team brings deep expertise across DATs, DeFi, and stablecoins, with engineering experience from Artemis – a leading blockchain data company focused on stablecoin and onchain analytics – and M31 Capital, a DeFi-focused venture and liquid fund. All founders are alumni of the University of Pennsylvania.
With support from YZi Labs and Sora Ventures, Saturn is well positioned for global market penetration and to become a dominant force in DeFi. Li notes that as Bitcoin transforms into a new credit layer, Saturn will be the first stablecoin protocol to offer double-digit yields at $10B scale.
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored press release. Readers are encouraged to perform their own due diligence before acting on any information presented in this article.
CLARITY Act Markup Postponed By Senate Banking Committee
The Senate Banking Committee postponed its planned markup of the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act, capping what had been expected to be a pivotal week for U.S. crypto policy with an anticlimactic halt amid growing industry opposition and unresolved political disputes, according to reporting from Crypto in America.
The decision came after tensions escalated throughout the week as crypto companies and trade groups voiced frustration over late-stage amendments to the 278-page market structure bill.
Critics argued the changes tilted the legislation further in favor of banks and traditional finance, particularly by tightening restrictions around stablecoin rewards and tokenization.
Compounding the uncertainty, Democrats on the committee continued to press for stronger ethics provisions that would bar senior government officials — including the president — from personally profiting from crypto ventures. Those provisions have repeatedly stalled in negotiations with the White House, contributing to the impasse.
The immediate catalyst for the CLARITY Act postponement arrived around 4:00 p.m. Jan. 14, when Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong announced that the exchange was withdrawing its support for the bill. Coinbase had been one of the most influential industry backers of a comprehensive market structure framework, investing heavily in lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill.
“We appreciate all the hard work by members of the Senate to reach a bipartisan outcome, but this version would be materially worse than the current status quo,” Armstrong wrote in a post on X. “We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill.”
In a follow-up post, Armstrong said he remained optimistic that lawmakers could still reach an acceptable compromise and pledged that Coinbase would continue engaging with policymakers on the CLARITY Act.
The withdrawal was a major setback. The loss of support from one of crypto’s most prominent policy voices risked signaling to undecided senators that the bill lacked sufficient industry consensus, raising the likelihood the committee would delay or abandon the markup altogether.
While the markup was ultimately postponed, Coinbase’s decision did not trigger a complete industry retreat. Several major firms and advocacy groups — including a16z, Circle, Paradigm, Kraken, Ripple, Coin Center, and the Digital Chamber — publicly reaffirmed their support for moving forward with a markup.
“It is easy to walk away when a process gets difficult,” Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi said in a post on X. “What is hard and what actually matters is continuing to show up, working through disagreements, and building consensus in a system designed to require it.”
In a brief statement announcing the postponement, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-SC) said that “everyone remains at the table working in good faith,” but he did not offer a new date for the markup or specify which issues would need to be resolved before it could be rescheduled.
The Senate is out of session next week for the Martin Luther King Jr. Day recess and is set to return the following week.
The Senate Agriculture Committee, which shares jurisdiction over parts of the bill — particularly spot market oversight and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s role — is expected to hold its own markup on the CLARITY Act later this month after postponing an earlier session.
It remains unclear whether Banking’s delay will affect Agriculture’s timeline.
What is the CLARITY Act?
The CLARITY Act, which uses House-passed H.R. 3633 as its base text, is designed to establish a comprehensive federal framework for digital asset markets.
The legislation seeks to divide oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the CFTC, set standards for payment stablecoins, clarify rules for decentralized finance, and protect software developers who do not control customer funds.
Supporters, primarily Republicans, argue the bill would replace regulatory uncertainty with clear rules, strengthen anti-fraud and illicit finance authorities, and bring crypto activity back onshore. Committee fact sheets describe it as the “strongest illicit finance framework Congress has ever considered” for digital assets.
Critics, however, contend the bill weakens investor protections and risks creating new loopholes.
Former SEC Chief Accountant Lynn Turner warned earlier this week that the CLARITY Act draft lacks Sarbanes – Oxley–level safeguards, such as mandatory audited financial statements, internal control certifications, and robust Public Company Accounting Oversight Board oversight — deficiencies he said could enable another FTX-style collapse.
Stablecoin rewards have emerged as one of the most contentious issues in the CLARITY Act. Banking groups argue that yield-bearing stablecoins could siphon deposits from traditional banks, while crypto firms counter that broad bans on rewards would stifle innovation and push users toward offshore platforms.
Galaxy Digital stock rises 4% after Texas grid operator approves data center expansion
The expansion supports Galaxy’s AI and high-performance computing plans, with construction underway on the first phase.
Mastercard, Visa and Revolut lose UK legal challenge over card fee cap plans
Mastercard, Visa and Revolut have lost a legal challenge against the Payment Systems Regulator over the UK watchdog’s decision to cap interchange fees on cross-border online payments.
Editorial
This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community.
In late 2024, the PSR decided to push ahead with plans to introduce a price cap on the fees Visa and Mastercard charge UK merchants when European shoppers make online purchases.
The card giants, alongside fintech Revolut, brought a case at London’s High Court over the plan, arguing that the regulator did not have the power to impose price caps.
Judge John Cavanagh has rejected the challenge and ruled that the PSR does have the power to impose the caps.
David Geale, MD, PSR, says: “We welcome the High Court’s decision, which confirms our powers to ensure card payment costs are fair for UK businesses and consumers. This enables us to drive forward the work we have been doing to ensure cross-border interchange fees are set at an appropriate level.”
Visa, Mastercard and Revolut have yet to comment on the ruling.
Explaining its initial decision to impose caps, the PSR said in 2024 that, over the course of 2021 and 2022 Mastercard and Visa raised their cross-border interchange fees fivefold from 0.2% to 1.15% for debit cards and 0.3% to 1.5% for credit cards. This post-Brexit increase, claimed the PSR, costs businesses £150-200 million extra per year.
The PSR has now consulted on the methodology for assessing an appropriate cap and says this will “inform the regulator’s next steps”.
Commenting on the decision, Michelle Quinn, partner at Grosvenor Law, says: “If the proposed cap comes into effect, there is a clear line between the potential winners and the losers. A cap on interchange fees could give retailers some much needed breathing room by cutting the costs they face every time an EU customer pays online, and consumers could benefit if those savings translate into lower prices.
“But for banks and fintechs, it’s a squeeze – interchange fees are a meaningful revenue stream and there is a real risk to their business if the fees are capped at such a level that they lose money on each transaction.”
Multiple Signs Point to a Potential XRP Price Rally Toward $2.80.
XRP’s technical and onchain signals hint at a bullish breakout, with bulls eyeing a significant rally toward $2.80 by the month’s end.
XRP’s (XRP) price may reach $2.80 by month’s end, according to several bullish technical setups on multiple time frames.
Key takeaways:
-
XRP technical chart setups converge on the $2.80 target.
-
Spot taker CVD remains positive, suggesting confidence among buyers.
XRP falling wedge breakout targets $2.70
The XRP/USD pair broke out of a falling wedge pattern on Jan. 1, as shown on the two-day chart below.
Related: XRP reclaims $2 as fund inflows diverge from broader crypto outflows
In technical analysis, a falling wedge is a classic bullish setup characterized by two downward-sloping, converging trendlines, showing decreasing selling momentum and volume. It often leads to an upside breakout as sellers get exhausted and buyers take control.
The altcoin is required to hold above the support at $2 to increase its chances of a return toward $2.40. Overcoming this resistance would open the way for a run toward the bullish target of the prevailing chart pattern at $2.70.
“$XRP is breaking out of a Falling Wedge after trading sideways for a month”, Trader CryptoWIZRD said in a recent post on X, adding that the last time this happened was in Q4/2025 when the price “exploded” 486%.

XRP bull flag targets $2.80
The eight-hour chart shows XRP price trading with a bull flag, with the price facing resistance from the pattern’s upper trendline at $2.15.
An eight-hour candlestick close above this area will clear that path for XRP’s rise toward the top of the flag’s post at $2.41 and later to the measured target of the prevailing chart pattern at $2.80.
Such a move would represent a 32.5% increase from the current price.

The relative strength index has increased to 51 from 42 on Monday, suggesting growing bullish momentum.
As Cointelegraph reported, a break above the downtrend line on a descending channel at $2.30 on the daily chart could signal a potential trend change. The XRP/USDT pair may then rally to $2.70.
XRP spot taker CVD signals high buyer volumes
The 90-day Spot Taker Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD), a metric showing the balance of buyers and sellers, reveals that buy-orders (taker buy) have become dominant again.
CryptoQuant data shows that the demand-side pressure has dominated the order book since November 2025, with the XRP/USD pair rising 16% in 2026 so far.

This indicates that more traders are buying XRP at the market price, rather than waiting for cheaper bids, demonstrating growing confidence in higher prices ahead.
The last time XRP saw a similar surge in spot CVD was in July 2025, preceding a 65% price rally within weeks. This echoes the technical setup with a $2.80 target from the yearly open.
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
Bitcoin Joins Gold Rally as Trump Tariffs and Fed Fears Roil Markets
Global markets are starting the new week in a defensive crouch, with investors rotating into traditional havens and selectively back into crypto as geopolitical risk, tariff uncertainty and questions around the Federal Reserve’s autonomy collide.
The shift has been most visible in precious metals. Gold and silver both pushed to fresh records in recent sessions, extending a rally that has accelerated as traders price a higher probability of policy shocks — from the Middle East to Washington. Gold climbed above $4,600/oz this week, while silver broke through $90/oz for the first time, a move that has left the metal within striking distance of psychologically charged round numbers.
At the center of the latest risk repricing is U.S. President Donald Trump’s threat to impose a 25% tariff on countries “doing business” with Iran, a step that would widen the Iran standoff into a broader trade channel and test the resilience of already-fragile global supply chains.
Tariffs move from headline risk to legal cliff edge
Tariff risk is also being reframed by the U.S. Supreme Court, which is poised to decide over the legality of Trump’s “global tariffs” imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) — a ruling that could reshape the boundaries of presidential authority over trade policy.
The uncertainty is feeding volatility in rate- and FX-sensitive assets because it hits markets through multiple channels at once: growth expectations, inflation risk via import costs, and corporate earnings visibility. Traders have also been watching prediction markets for signals of sentiment around the Court outcome, with some market chatter pointing to low odds of the tariffs being upheld — though those probabilities can swing quickly and aren’t a substitute for the legal fundamentals.
Fed independence becomes a market variable
What’s different this month is that investors are also treating central-bank governance — typically “background noise” — as a live macro factor.
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the Justice Department served the Fed with grand jury subpoenas tied to his Senate testimony on cost overruns at the central bank’s renovation project, warning the probe threatened a criminal indictment and arguing the episode amounts to intimidation.
The political pressure has rippled beyond the U.S. Finnish central bank governor Olli Rehn warned that any loss of Fed independence risks structurally higher inflation and could undermine financial stability by eroding credibility in bond markets.
For traders, the immediate translation is straightforward: if confidence in the inflation-fighting framework is perceived to weaken, the premium for holding hard assets rises — one reason gold and silver have continued to outperform even as parts of the risk complex struggle to find footing.
Equities have been choppy, and the early read from earnings season is doing little to calm nerves.
JPMorgan Chase posted results that beat expectations on the back of strong trading, but investors focused on weaker-than-anticipated investment-banking fees; the shares fell about 4% after the release, adding pressure to U.S. equity sentiment.
The broader message for equity markets is less about one quarter’s numbers and more about the macro backdrop: if tariffs and geopolitics keep risk premia elevated, underwriting and dealmaking can stay suppressed even when trading desks benefit from volatility.
FX: Yen slides toward “intervention zone” as politics bite
Currency markets are amplifying the macro crosscurrents. The Japanese yen has weakened sharply and flirted with levels that have historically triggered official pushback. Japanese authorities have stepped up warnings as USD/JPY approached the 160 area, framing the move as speculative and “one-sided,” while markets weigh the risk of direct intervention.
Political uncertainty is adding fuel: traders have been positioning around Japan’s election outlook and the possibility of expansionary fiscal policy, which can complicate the inflation-and-rates calculus for the Bank of Japan.
Commodities: havens soar, oil cools — but the risk premium lingers
In commodities, the divergence is telling.
- Gold and silver: The rally has been driven by a mix of geopolitical fear, policy uncertainty and haven demand, with record highs this week.
- Oil: Crude gave back part of its recent surge after Trump’s comments eased immediate fears of U.S. military escalation with Iran. Brent fell to roughly $64–$65/bbl and WTI to about $60/bbl, with inventories and oversupply concerns reinforcing the pullback even as geopolitical risks remain embedded in pricing.
This push-pull — a geopolitical bid versus structural oversupply anxieties — is one reason energy markets have been prone to sharp, headline-driven swings.
Crypto: Bitcoin rides the “non-sovereign hedge” narrative back toward $100,000
Bitcoin has reasserted itself in the macro conversation, climbing to a two-month high above $97,000 as investors digest softer inflation signals and the broader theme of institutional distrust in policy stability.
BTC was trading around $96,698 at the time of writing, after an intraday high near $97,758, according to data from CoinMarketCap.
That price action is drawing a parallel — increasingly common on trading desks — between “traditional” havens and crypto’s role as a non-sovereign store of value. Bitget CEO Gracy Chen argued that investors are building portfolios that blend gold exposure with Bitcoin, reflecting a more unified approach across TradFi and digital assets.
Chen also challenged the classic “altcoin season” playbook, suggesting crypto’s next phase may be more selective — with liquidity concentrating in higher-utility networks and regulated, real-world-asset-linked structures rather than broad speculative rallies. That view echoes a wider theme in crypto market structure as institutional participation deepens, though it remains contested among traders who still look for reflexive risk-on phases once macro volatility fades.
What investors are watching next
The near-term path for risk appetite now hinges on a handful of catalysts that could hit quickly and violently:
- The Supreme Court’s tariff decision, and what it implies about the durability and future scope of executive-driven trade policy.
- Iran escalation risk — where protest dynamics and U.S. posture are feeding commodity and FX hedging demand.
- Japan’s yen line in the sand, as officials signal readiness to act if depreciation becomes disorderly.
- The credibility premium for U.S. monetary policy, as the Powell subpoena fight keeps “Fed independence” in the pricing conversation.
As Lukman Otunuga of FXTM put it, markets are being “pulled in multiple directions,” a dynamic that tends to keep volatility elevated and encourages traders to stay hedged — even when pockets of risk appetite reappear.
Read Also:
Disclaimer: The information provided on AlexaBlockchain is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read complete disclaimer here.
Image Credits: CoinMarketCap, Shutterstock, Canva, Wiki Commons
Crypto Market Structure Bill in Limbo as Industry Pulls Support
Lawmakers and crypto industry bigwigs have hit an impasse over the crypto market structure bill that had been making its way through the Senate. Now the future of the bill is uncertain as legislators go back to the drawing board.
The initial goal had been to pass the landmark crypto legislation by September 2025. The deadline came and went, prompting a revised target of the end of the year.
Just two weeks into 2026, the Senate has canceled a crucial markup vote to define language and other parameters of the bill. Major industry groups have also withdrawn their support.
With lawmakers and crypto industry representatives still at loggerheads over critical issues within the bill, the timeline for a comprehensive crypto law has stretched even further.
Coinbase withdraws from crypto market structure bill
On Thursday, the US Senate Banking Committee postponed a markup hearing, a crucial opportunity for legislators to debate a bill and discuss possible changes.
Chairman Tim Scott, a Republican senator from South Carolina, said that the break was simply a “brief pause.” He said he’d “spoken with leaders across the crypto industry, the financial sector, and my Democratic and Republican colleagues, and everyone remains at the table working in good faith.”
Scott did not say when the next markup session would be. But the cancellation comes just days after the Senate Agriculture Committee, another group tasked with reviewing the legislation, postponed its own markup session to Jan. 27.
On Tuesday, Scott published a list of “myths” about the bill, refuting claims that the legislation was written by the crypto industry and designed to serve its interests. “The bill has been shaped by years of bipartisan work, extensive engagement with regulators and law enforcement, and a focus on public-interest outcomes,” Republican lawmakers claimed.
Still, just two days later, Coinbase withdrew its support, after which the committee scrapped plans for markup. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said there are “too many issues” with the bill as written, namely:
-
A de facto ban on tokenized equities
-
Prohibitions on decentralized finance (DeFi)
-
Subversion of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) authority to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
-
Bans on stablecoin interest.
Armstrong said that “this version would be materially worse than the current status quo. We’d rather have no bill than a bad bill. Hopefully we can all get to a better draft.”
Coinbase has long been critical of the prohibitions on interest-bearing stablecoins, which it sees as an effort by the banking lobby to protect its business from disruption from the crypto industry.
Related: Banks lobby US Treasury for blanket stablecoin yield ban, Coinbase pushes back
Some observers stressed the importance of keeping a broad range of financial services available to the investing public.
Ji Hun Kim, CEO of blockchain industry advocacy group Crypto Council for Innovation, told Cointelegraph, “It remains critical to preserve consumer choice and ensure any framework supports responsible competition. Clear, workable rules should protect consumers and drive innovation without narrowing the range of financial services available.”
Other crypto executives expressed interest in continued cooperation with lawmakers in Washington. Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi said, “Market structure legislation is, by definition, complex. Resolving it was never going to be frictionless. The existence of remaining issues does not mean the effort has failed. It means we are doing the hard work of governing.”
Rulemaking could take years
Even if Congress can get a bill together that the industry approves, its implementation is likely to take a long time.
Justin Slaughter, vice president of regulatory affairs at crypto investment firm Paradigm, said, “There are just a ton of rulemakings in this bill.” He noted 45 separate instances where regulatory agencies would have to issue rules if the bill was passed into law.
The process of implementing this bill will not just run through this presidential term; it will probably run through the entirety of the next one.”
He recalled the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the rulemaking on which is still not finished today. “Most of the non-CFTC rules were finished [between] 2013 [and] 2018, three to eight years after passage,” he said.
And that’s assuming that the bill can pass. As written, there are a number of hurdles, Slaughter said. He noted friction over DeFi, which will require further clarification and new definitions. He said there’d be “real issues” with how to launch DeFi protocols, which “definitionally cannot be decentralized on day one.”
He also recalled the absence of anything about quorums for regulatory agencies. Presently, both the SEC and CFTC are run entirely by Republicans. While traditionally the minority party has been represented, some agencies are currently running on skeleton crews of those loyal to the presidential administration.
Related: SEC now all-Republican as crypto rulemaking momentum builds in 2026
Slaughter said that Democrats “won’t sign a bill that doesn’t guarantee that some Democratic commissioners will be able to help implement this bill, nor should they.”
Rachel Lin, CEO and co-founder of crypto trading platform SynFutures, told Cointelegraph that rulemaking after the fact leaves much to be desired. “Clarity needs to come from statute, not just future regulatory guidance, or the industry risks trading one form of uncertainty for another,” she said.
Be it partisan divisions or industry pushback, the Clarity Act is far from complete, and it could be a long time before the industry sees the regulation it wants in Washington.
Magazine: Here’s why crypto is moving to Dubai and Abu Dhabi
Cointelegraph Features and Cointelegraph Magazine publish long-form journalism, analysis and narrative reporting produced by Cointelegraph’s in-house editorial team and selected external contributors with subject-matter expertise. All articles are edited and reviewed by Cointelegraph editors in line with our editorial standards. Contributions from external writers are commissioned for their experience, research or perspective and do not reflect the views of Cointelegraph as a company unless explicitly stated. Content published in Features and Magazine does not constitute financial, legal or investment advice. Readers should conduct their own research and consult qualified professionals where appropriate. Cointelegraph maintains full editorial independence. The selection, commissioning and publication of Features and Magazine content are not influenced by advertisers, partners or commercial relationships.
Crypto for Advisors: Blockchain’s Impact on Government
The CLARITY Act, expected to clarify digital asset rules, will enable blockchain to bring real-time transparency to government operations and public spending.
