Home Blog Page 1159

Pump.fun Unveils Market-Driven Fund for Early-Stage Crypto Projects

0

In brief

  • The Solana-based platform will fund 12 projects with $250,000 each via a “Build in Public” hackathon, requiring founders to launch tokens and attract users in real time.
  • Pump.fun said it will prioritize organic traction over founder credentials, opening the program to crypto and non-crypto projects alike.
  • Critics warned the model raises unresolved questions around governance, transparency and whether on-chain traction can be reliably verified.

Solana-based meme coin launchpad Pump.fun announced Monday a $3 million fund that replaces traditional venture capital gatekeepers with market-driven token launches.

The platform’s new investment arm, Pump Fund, will distribute the capital through its “Build in Public Hackathon,” funding 12 projects with $250,000 each at a $10 million valuation, the company said Monday in a statement on X. 

Unlike conventional accelerators, where founders pitch to judges, winners will launch tokens and let market demand determine their fate.

“Your users are the ones that fund you by betting on you early. Those who can capture the minds of the people are empowered like nowhere else,” Pump.fun wrote in its statement.

The hackathon accepts projects across all verticals and maturity levels, including non-crypto projects, and requires participants to own at least 10% of their token supply while they “build in public” by posting on X, forming communities, and streaming on Pump.fun.

The platform, which has facilitated over 14 million token launches and generated more than $1 billion in revenue during its first two years, says it will prioritize “organic traction” over traditional metrics like founder pedigree or connections.

However, experts question whether Pump.fun’s model can ensure transparency, as the platform sets a February 18 deadline and promises its first winners by day 30.

Musheer Ahmed, founder and managing director of Finstep Asia, told Decrypt the fund requires greater clarity on governance and distribution processes, stressing the need to ensure projects don’t receive “bias or favours/preferred treatment from the Pump.fun team.”

He compared the market-driven approach with traditional VC processes where “investment committees’ evaluation of a start-up and also the profile of the founder/s and the core team” drive decisions, calling those judgements “essentially subjective.”

Ahmed said that while Pump.fun plans to pick winners based on “the traction and users that each project onboards,” he pointed out the critical need for verification mechanisms to ensure traction is “genuine” and is “not AI-driven or bot-driven” to prevent gaming the selection process.

Pratik Kala, head of research at Apollo Crypto, told Decrypt the model represents “certainly an interesting concept” that could provide “social proof and signal that people are excited about a project,” drawing parallels to prediction markets.

“It’s hard to say what rights (if any) tokenholders have—we have seen numerous examples of using tokens as a bootstrapping mechanism, then siphoning off real money into equity structures,” he added, noting that LaunchCoin attempted a similar model last year but failed.

“Overall, I think it’s too early to tell if this model will work,” Kala said. “For this to succeed, there has to be transparency and look-through on the project’s success and dollars flowing back to tokenholders.”

The announcement comes as Pump.fun attempts to rehabilitate its image following a turbulent 2025 after pausing livestreaming over animal cruelty and self-harm broadcasts.

It is also facing a class action alleging that its parent, Baton Corp., operated an illegal securities exchange by enabling the issuance of 50,000 unregistered tokens while collecting nearly $500 million in fees.

Daily Debrief Newsletter

Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Bitcoin falls under $91,000 as solana, xrp and cardano nurse weekly losses

0

Tuesday’s crypto tape was steadier after Monday’s tariff-driven wobble, but sentiment remains cautious with altcoins still weaker than bitcoin.

A Dormant BTC Wallet Just Moved After 13 Years

0

A dormant Satoshi-era Bitcoin wallet has jolted back to life after 13 years, transferring its entire 909.38 BTC balance, worth approximately $84.6 million at current prices, into a fresh BTC address. 

Onchain data from blockchain analytics firm Arkham Intelligence shows that the address first received Bitcoin (BTC) in 2013, when one coin was still trading at under $7, implying a paper gain in excess of 13,900 times. 

For comparison, if, instead of buying 909.38 BTC, worth around $6,400 in 2013, the same amount had gone into a low‑cost S&P 500 index fund, it would be worth roughly $37,000 today, after a gain of around 481%.

Over the same roughly 13‑year window, benchmark gold prices have risen around 150%; solid returns, but still dwarfed by a 13,900x Bitcoin move.

A dormant BTC wallet wakes up. Source: Arkham Intelligence

Related: Dormant Bitcoin wallet moves $536M after over 5-year hiatus

Old whales are waking up

The dormant whale transfer comes after a revival of older wallets in 2024–25, when long‑dormant addresses, including 10‑plus‑year “OG” holders, collectively moved over $50 billion worth of BTC. Onchain data showed tens of thousands of those ancient coins were ultimately spent.

For investors, the human side of this story is almost as striking as the numbers. Holding through multiple 70–80% drawdowns, the 2017 and 2021 bubbles, major exchange failures, contentious forks like Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and Bitcoin SV (BSV), and rolling regulatory crackdowns would have required unusual conviction (or, perhaps, the possibility of the owner simply losing their keys and only recently recovering access). 

The Jan. 19 shift to a new address could be routine (albeit slightly delayed) security hygiene, a change of custody, or the first step toward eventual liquidation, and onchain analysts will be watching closely to see whether the funds flow to known exchange wallets.

Related: Jefferies’ ‘Greed & Fear’ strategist cuts Bitcoin allocation to zero on quantum risk

Quantum risk and “exposed” UTXOs

Early holders may also be repositioning in response to a growing chorus of warnings about future quantum attacks on Bitcoin’s elliptic‑curve signatures, the cryptographic signatures Bitcoin uses to prove that someone with the private key authorized a transaction.

This is particularly pertinent for older UTXOs (the “unspent transaction outputs” that make up a wallet’s balance and represent individual chunks of BTC created by past transactions), which have already exposed their public keys.

While most cryptographers still see quantum computers as years away, recent research has urged the ecosystem to prepare migration paths to post‑quantum schemes, a risk that could motivate security-conscious OGs to move coins into newer setups even if they are not yet selling.

Magazine: Kevin O’Leary says quantum attacking Bitcoin would be a waste of time