Home Blog Page 1058

How decentralized AI training will create a new asset class for digital intelligence

0

Frontier AI — the most advanced general-purpose AI systems currently in development — is becoming one of the world’s most strategically and economically important industries, yet it remains largely inaccessible to most investors and builders. Training a competitive AI model today, similar to the ones retail users frequent, can cost hundreds of millions of dollars, demand tens of thousands of high‑end GPUs, and require a level of operational sophistication that only a handful of companies can support. Thus, for most investors, especially retail ones, there is no direct way to own a piece of the artificial intelligence sector.

That constraint is about to change. A new generation of decentralized AI networks is moving from theory to production. These networks connect GPUs of all kinds from around the world, ranging from expensive high‑end hardware to consumer gaming rigs and even your MacBook’s M4 chip, into a single training fabric capable of supporting large, frontier‑scale processes. What matters for markets is that this infrastructure does more than coordinate compute; it also coordinates ownership by issuing tokens to participants who contribute resources, which gives them a direct stake in the AI models they help create.

Decentralized training is a genuine advance in the state of the art. Training large models across untrusted, heterogeneous hardware on the open internet was, until recently, said to be an impossibility by AI experts. However, Prime Intellect has now trained decentralized models currently in production — one with 10 billion parameters (the quick, efficient all-rounder that’s fast and capable for everyday tasks) and another with 32 billion parameters (the deep thinker that excels at complex reasoning and delivers more nuanced, sophisticated results).

Gensyn, a decentralized machine-learning protocol, has demonstrated reinforcement learning that can be verified onchain. Pluralis has shown that training large models using commodity GPUs (the standard graphics cards found in gaming computers and consumer devices, rather than expensive specialized chips) in a swarm is an increasingly viable decentralized approach for large-scale pretraining, the foundational phase where AI models learn from massive datasets before being fine-tuned for specific tasks.

To be clear, this work is not just some research project—it’s already happening. In decentralized training networks, the model does not “sit” inside a single company’s data center. Instead, it lives across the network itself. Model parameters are fragmented and distributed, meaning no single participant owns the entire asset. Contributors supply GPU compute and bandwidth, and in return, they receive tokens that reflect their stake in the resulting model. This way, training participants don’t just serve as resources; they earn alignment and ownership in the AI they are creating. This is a very different alignment from what we see in centralized AI labs.

Here, tokenization becomes integral, giving the model an economic structure and market value. A tokenized AI model acts like a stock, with cash flows reflecting the model’s demand. Just like OpenAI and Anthropic charge users for API access, so can decentralized networks. The result is a new kind of asset: tokenized intelligence.

Instead of investing in a large public company that owns models, investors can gain exposure to models directly. Networks will implement this through different strategies. Some tokens may primarily confer access rights — priority or guaranteed usage of the model’s capabilities — while others may explicitly track a share of net revenue generated when users pay to run queries through the model. In both cases, the token markets begin to function like a stock market for models, where prices reflect expectations about a model’s quality, demand and usefulness. For many investors, this may be the most direct path to participate financially in AI’s growth.

This development does not occur in a vacuum. Tokenization is already moving into the financial mainstream, with platforms like Superstate and Securitize (set to go public in 2026) that are bringing funds and traditional securities onchain. Real‑world asset strategies are now a popular topic among regulators, asset managers and banks. Tokenized AI models naturally fit into this category: they are digitally native, accessible to anyone with an internet connection regardless of location, and their core economic activity—computation for inference, the process of running queries through a trained model to get answers—is already automated and trackable by software. Among all tokenized assets, continuously improving AI systems may be the most inherently dynamic, as models can be upgraded, retrained and improved over time.

Decentralized AI networks are a natural extension of the thesis that blockchains enable communities to collectively fund, build, and own digital assets in ways previously impossible. First was money, then financial contracts, then real‑world assets. AI models are the next digitally native asset class to be organized, owned and traded onchain. Our view is that the intersection of crypto and AI will not be limited to “AI‑themed tokens”; it will be anchored in actual model revenue, backed by measurable compute and usage.

It is still early. Most decentralized training systems are in active development, and many token designs will fail technical, economic or regulatory tests. But the direction is clear: the decentralized AI training networks are set to become a liquid, globally coordinated resource. AI models are becoming shareable, ownable and tradable through tokens. As these networks mature, markets will not just price companies that build intelligence; they will price intelligence itself.

Latam Powerhouse Nu Receives Approval to Launch Digital Bank in the US

0

Nu, the Latam-focused neobank, has reached a milestone by receiving a conditional approval to establish a national bank in the U.S., Nubank N.A. The organization, which serves over 127 million customers, says its new challenge will be to prove that digital-first services are the future of the financial services industry. Nu Receives OCC Approval To […]

BTC hashrate drops 12% in worst drawdown since China mining ban

0

Bitcoin mining activity has taken its biggest hit since late 2021 after a severe winter storm in the United States forced several large mining firms to curtail operations, triggering a sharp drop in network hashrate, production and revenue.

Bitcoin’s total network hashrate has fallen about 12% since November 11, marking the largest drawdown since October 2021, when the network was still recovering from China’s sweeping mining ban.

(CryptoQuant)

The hashrate now sits near 970 exahashes per second, its lowest level since September 2025, according to CryptoQuant data.

The decline accelerated this week as extreme weather disrupted power supply across key US mining hubs.

Several publicly listed miners temporarily shut down machines to protect infrastructure and comply with grid curtailment requests, amplifying an already softening trend that began as bitcoin pulled back from its $126,000 all time high toward the $100,000 level late last year.

The hashrate shock quickly fed into miner economics. Daily bitcoin mining revenue dropped from roughly $45 million on January 22 to a yearly low of $28 million just two days later. While revenue has since rebounded modestly to around $34 million, it remains well below recent averages, reflecting both lower network activity and weaker bitcoin prices.

Production figures show an equally sharp contraction. Output from the largest publicly traded miners fell from 77 bitcoin per day to just 28 bitcoin over the same period. Production from other miners declined from 403 bitcoin to 209 bitcoin, bringing total network output down sharply.

On a 30-day rolling basis, publicly listed miners recorded a 48 bitcoin decline in production, the steepest since May 2024, shortly after the last halving. Output from non public miners dropped by 215 bitcoin, the largest fall since July 2024.

Profitability has also deteriorated, further pressuring the energy-intensive business.
CryptoQuant’s Miner Profit and Loss Sustainability Index has fallen to 21, its lowest reading since November 2024. The level signals that miners are operating in deeply stressed conditions, with revenues failing to cover costs for a growing share of the network despite multiple downward difficulty adjustments over recent epochs.

(CryptoQuant)

(CryptoQuant)

While difficulty has eased as machines went offline, the relief has not been enough to offset falling prices and operational disruptions. If hashrate remains suppressed, the network could see further difficulty cuts in coming weeks, offering some margin relief.

For now, the data points to one of the most challenging stretches for bitcoin miners since the post China ban reset more than four years ago.

Tesla overtakes Bitcoin on global asset leaderboard

0

Bitcoin has fallen to the 12th-largest asset globally by market capitalization, slipping behind Tesla in the rankings, according to CompaniesMarketCap.

The digital asset’s price tumbled to $81,000 earlier today and continued to fall as trading progressed. At the time of writing, BTC was hovering around $77,300, down 8% over the past 24 hours, TradingView data shows.

The recent decline has pushed Bitcoin’s market capitalization down to approximately $1.5 trillion, allowing Tesla, now valued at $1.6 trillion, to move ahead to the 11th position.

Earlier this week, Bitcoin fell out of the top 10 global assets, placing it behind Meta Platforms and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company.

The sharp market correction this morning has triggered widespread deleveraging, wiping out roughly $2.5 billion in leveraged crypto positions in the past day, per CoinGlass.

Long traders bore the brunt of the losses at $2.4 billion, while more than 408,000 traders were liquidated.

Inside the Rise of Apps That Let You Pay with Crypto, Even Where Merchants Don’t Accept It

0

Pay-on-behalf experiments are expanding crypto payment acceptance, but some experts have regulatory concerns.

A small group of startups is quietly showing that crypto can be spent at regular stores without forcing merchants to change their point-of-sale systems or learn complicated new procedures.

They work through a pay-on-behalf system, where shoppers scan the merchant’s usual bank QR code, send crypto into an app or escrow wallet, and a local partner pays the merchant in fiat.

The crypto goes to the local partner after the merchant gets paid, so the app or escrow wallet holds the funds until the payment is settled, acting like a temporary promise to pay.

Launched in late 2024, PlebQR is one example that brings together Thailand’s PromptPay system, a government-backed payment network, and Bitcoin.

Users can spend BTC on the Lightning Network at any Thai merchant with a PromptPay QR code by getting matched with a local who pays the merchant in Thai baht for them. Once the local partner completes the payment, they receive the crypto and the customer’s payment at the merchant is completed.

PlebQR emphasizes privacy. According to the website, all authentication data is deleted after an order, apart from the price and access time. Lightning addresses, invoices, QR codes, and receipts aren’t stored and the system isn’t connected to PromptPay, so no data is shared with third parties, per the project’s privacy policy.

Data from the website shows that PlebQR has handled over 1,270 payments with more than 670,000 Thai baht (around $21,560) since launch, with more than a 75% success rate, while average payment time takes about 88 seconds, though The Defiant couldn’t independently verify these figures.

Stablecoin Alternative

While PlebQR handles only Bitcoin payments, other startups have focused on stablecoins instead.

Kyrgyzstan-incorporated crypto startup Antarctic Wallet takes a similar approach but offers services mainly in Russia, which is under international sanctions, and where crypto can’t be used directly as cash due to the local restrictions.

Users sign up via Telegram, scan a merchant SBP QR — the country’s analog of FedNow — and pay in USDT or TON. The app then routes the fiat to the merchant via a “verified counterparty,” while deducting the crypto from the user’s balance. Payments take about eight seconds and transfers to a card take two to three minutes, according to the website.

But unlike PlebQR, Antarctic Wallet isn’t fully non-custodial and applies fees to cover “blockchain network fees and AML checks.”

The platform requires a minimum deposit of $5 in USDT. Fees for top-ups vary depending on the token and network, with $2.75 for USDT on TRC-20 and 0.2 TON for TON on the TON network. Top-ups in USDT using the TON network are currently free.

It’s worth noting that these projects aren’t entirely new. Enthusiasts have built similar demos at ETHGlobal Taipei in 2025, showing tourists could scan local QR codes and pay merchants via local users who receive crypto in return.

Regulatory Risks and UX Tradeoffs

Tom Armstrong, head of compliance advisory at blockchain forensics firm TRM Labs, noted in commentary for The Defiant that platforms like PlebQR and Antarctic Waller can differ significantly in risk profile depending on their custody model.

“In more centralized models—where a platform holds user funds, aggregates liquidity, and executes payments on users’ behalf—the platform effectively becomes the primary AML control point,” Armstrong said.

He added that non-custodial approaches, by contrast, “typically present a different and often lower risk profile for the platform operator itself.”

There are several other trade-offs as well. Peer-match flows depend on the reliability of local partners, and even in demonstrated examples, payments through services like PlebQR take several minutes to complete, a big lag compared with the near-instant experience of Visa or Mastercard.

And on top of that, users should keep in mind that even non-custodial products handling fiat payments can be exposed to money laundering, which increases financial and regulatory risks and could lead to delays, frozen funds or scrutiny from authorities.

Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, told The Defiant that they pay-on-behalf models show “something real and positive” because they let people “actually use crypto in the real world, not just hold it.”

But he also warned that a lot of these setups run through hidden layers of intermediaries.

“When you cannot see who is actually moving the funds or what controls are in place, AML and regulatory concerns emerge very quickly,” he said, adding that regulatory risk is heightened in jurisdictions like Russia or Kyrgyzstan, noting the potential for sanctions evasion and illicit finance exposure.

BitMine Faces $6B Unrealized Ether Loss as Crypto Sell-Off Deepens

0

BitMine Immersion Technologies, a publicly traded cryptocurrency treasury company linked to investor Tom Lee, is carrying significant unrealized losses on its Ether holdings following the latest wave of market liquidations, underscoring the risks facing crypto balance-sheet strategies during sharp downturns.

After acquiring an additional 40,302 Ether (ETH) last week and increasing its total holdings to more than 4.24 million ETH, BitMine’s unrealized losses have grown to over $6 billion, according to data from Dropstab, a platform that tracks digital asset prices and portfolio valuations.

Based on current market prices, BitMine’s Ether holdings are valued at roughly $9.6 billion, down from a peak of about $13.9 billion in October, reflecting the impact of the broader crypto sell-off.

Source: Dropstab

The paper losses mounted as Ether’s price slid toward $2,300 on Saturday, a move that The Kobeissi Letter attributed to fragile liquidity conditions.

“In a market where liquidity has been choppy at best, sustained levels of extreme leverage are resulting in “air pockets” in price,” the market commentator said, adding that “herd-like” positioning amplified the sell-off.

Related: Bitmine’s staked Ether holdings point to $164M in annual staking revenue

A difficult reset for crypto markets

Despite earlier optimism for the end of 2025, Tom Lee has warned that conditions have shifted, with 2026 likely starting on a “painful” note before any potential rebound later in the year.

In a recent interview, Lee said the crypto market is still feeling the effects of deleveraging, even as longer-term fundamentals remain intact. He pointed to the Oct. 10 market crash, which wiped out roughly $19 billion in value, as a key turning point that reset risk appetite across digital assets.

Source: Tom Lee

A recent assessment by market maker Wintermute echoed that view, arguing that a sustained recovery in 2026 will require structural improvements. These include renewed momentum in Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether, broader exchange-traded fund participation, expanded digital asset treasury mandates and a return of retail inflows.

Wintermute said these factors are needed to restore a wider wealth effect across the market. Retail participation, however, remains limited as investors continue to gravitate toward faster-growing themes such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing.

Related: Liquidations knock Bitcoin out of world’s top 10 assets