Home Blog Page 857

Behind the Idea: Cumbuca | The Fintech Times

0

Brazil has one of the world’s most advanced payments systems, but for international companies, getting access is rarely straightforward. Licensing can take years, capital requirements are steep, and relying on third-party platforms often means giving up control over products, data and infrastructure.

Cumbuca approaches the problem differently. Founded by Daniel Ruhman, the company operates as a regulatory proxy, enabling international teams to launch in Brazil in weeks rather than years, with direct access to the country’s payments infrastructure under Cumbuca’s Central Bank licence.

In this week’s Behind the Idea, Ruhman explains why Brazil remains a tough market for foreign fintechs, how firsthand experience led to Cumbuca’s model, and why tightening regulation is turning compliance into a competitive advantage.

Tell us more about your company and its offering
Daniel Ruhman, co-founder and CEO, Cumbuca
Daniel Ruhman, co-founder and CEO, Cumbuca

Cumbuca removes a key barrier international companies face when entering Brazil’s payments market. Getting a licence from the Central Bank can take years and requires significant capital.

Most firms aren’t willing to make that investment until they’ve proven market fit. The alternative has been working through third-party platforms that strip away flexibility and control.

We hold a payment institution licence under which clients can operate seamlessly. They get direct API access to the Central Bank, build their own systems, and retain all their data. When they eventually scale enough to justify their own licence, the infrastructure they built transfers with them.

International teams can launch in weeks instead of years, test their product in the market, and build what they need.

What problem was your company set up to solve?

Companies entering Brazil faced two difficult choices: They can either wait years and spend millions to obtain their own payments licence, or they can surrender operational control to third-party providers that restrict what they can build.

We experienced this problem firsthand while building consumer fintech products and trying to access Brazil’s payments infrastructure. As we scaled to over a million accounts, our growth was limited not by what we wanted to build but by the restrictions of our infrastructure partners. Customer issues often couldn’t be resolved quickly, outages were beyond our control, and critical features were delayed or couldn’t be launched.

We had also gone through the full licensing process ourselves and understood how slow, costly, and risky it can be, especially for international companies. Brazil treats financial services as a matter of national security, so foreign ownership of regulated entities requires extensive approvals.

We realised there was a missing option. Cumbuca is that third path.

Since launch, how has your company evolved?

Cumbuca has gone from cleaning services to community banking to bill-splitting to regulatory proxy. The lessons from those earlier versions inform everything we do today.

The infrastructure challenges we solved while building consumer products, the regulatory expertise we gained securing and operating our licence, and the understanding of what Brazilian users need all shape how we support our clients now. It enabled us to launch our proxy with the exact problems we were trying to solve in mind: stateless and horizontally scalable while ensuring full compliance. That’s what we built.

What has been the biggest challenge or most ‘tricky moment’ to overcome?

The regulatory environment has tightened significantly over the past year. Brazil’s Central Bank has raised capital and compliance requirements dramatically; what used to require R$1 million now costs 10x to 15x that, and adding new services to existing licences has become far more complex.

Up until recently, the Central Bank prioritised fostering innovation with relatively low barriers. Now the emphasis has shifted to financial stability and regulatory compliance. Many smaller fintechs will struggle to meet these new requirements.

This development validates Cumbuca’s model. We built compliance into our operations from day one rather than trying to retrofit it later. Our team includes some of Brazil’s leading regulatory experts, including Gustavo Lino, former President of INIT; Ana Luisa Monteiro, our CFO who specialises in Brazilian financial markets; and Nic Marcondes, who architected Brazil’s no-redirect payment flow.

The regulatory tightening means compliance becomes a differentiator for companies.

What are your biggest achievements or ‘proudest moment’ so far?

My proudest moment with Cumbuca was our last pivot. Reaching profitability within months of shifting to B2B confirmed the approach faster than we expected and proved that demand exists for a compliance-first model with technical flexibility.

Being the fourth payment initiation licence issued in Brazil also put us in the market early. We were building when open finance was still taking shape, which gave us a front-row seat to the development of the infrastructure and regulations. That timing is difficult to replicate.

Another highlight this year was our contribution to the Pix Anniversary Report, launched with W Fintechs to mark five years since Pix started. It was fascinating to step back and look at how something that began as a new payment method has become part of Brazil’s core financial infrastructure. The report covers adoption numbers, system design, and why other countries are increasingly paying attention to Brazil’s Open Finance approach.

How would you describe the culture of your company?

We are a team that’s been through the same problems our clients face. That shared experience shapes everything about how we work.

We value expertise and our team includes people who’ve built the systems we’re helping clients access, people who sit on regulatory boards, and people who’ve architected the infrastructure that powers Brazil’s open finance ecosystem. Our goal is not to have only smart people but the right team that understands this market from the inside.

Our focus is on doing things the right way. We have seen companies try to add compliance later or take shortcuts on infrastructure, and it never works. Our platform was designed from the ground up to handle scale, high transaction volumes, and zero downtime while staying fully compliant. This commitment to discipline guides everything we do.

We care about building infrastructure that works and relationships that last. We want to be the thinnest possible layer between our clients and the regulated environment, and that requires a culture of precision, transparency and partnership.

What’s in store for the future?

Cumbuca is focused on making it easier for companies to operate in Brazil while staying fully aligned with regulation. There are still many international firms that want to build there but struggle with the time and complexity involved in obtaining a licence.

We already support Open Finance and payment initiation through our existing licence, and given how quickly those systems are evolving, keeping up with them is a core part of what we do.

Our ambition is to become Brazil’s largest payment initiation and open finance data provider by the end of 2026. The regulatory environment is tightening, which creates opportunities for compliant players like us. We want to be the default choice for any international company serious about building in Brazil’s fintech ecosystem.

U.S. judge freezes BlockFills assets in dispute over 70 bitcoin with creditor Dominion Capital

0

A U.S. federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against crypto lender BlockFills in a lawsuit brought by Dominion Capital, temporarily freezing assets tied to the dispute, according to a filing seen by CoinDesk.

In a complaint dated February 27, Dominion alleged that BlockFills misappropriated and unlawfully retained millions of dollars’ worth of customer crypto assets, commingled client assets and concealed heavy losses.

Dominion claimed BlockFills concealed the misuse of customer funds and refused to return the company’s assets after suspending withdrawals in February. As part of the complaint, the investment firm sought an asset freeze to protect its crypto trapped on Blockfills’ platform, which was granted by the court.

In an order filed March 3 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, federal Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil barred the firm from transferring or disposing of 70.6 bitcoin allegedly belonging to Dominion, or moving assets outside the United States while the case proceeds.

The court also ordered Blockfills, which is backed by trading giant Susquehanna, to account for and segregate customer funds, including Dominion’s bitcoin, pending a hearing on a possible preliminary injunction.

CoinDesk reported last month that the crypto lender had incurred losses of around $75 million during the recent market downturn, and was looking for a buyer or emergency funding

BlockFills is a Chicago-based crypto trading and lending firm that provides liquidity, financing and risk-management services to institutional clients. Its platform facilitates crypto lending and borrowing, derivatives trading and over-the-counter (OTC) execution for hedge funds, asset managers, market makers and mining companies.

A Blockfills spokesperson said as a matter of policy the firm does not comment on pending litigation. Dominion Capital declined to comment.

A temporary restraining order in the U.S. is an emergency court order that temporarily stops someone from taking a specific action until the court can hold a full hearing. It’s commonly used in legal disputes involving money, assets or financial activity to prevent immediate harm.

The TRO was issued without notice to BlockFills, with the court citing a risk of “immediate and irreparable injury,” noting the firm had suspended client withdrawals and that insolvency could be imminent.

BlockFills must respond by March 17, when the temporary order is set to expire unless extended by the court.

Dominion Capital is a New York-based private investment firm and family office that invests across private equity, structured finance and digital assets, including backing bitcoin mining companies such as Bitfarms (BITF).

Tough times

Blockfills said it was halting customer withdrawals and deposits on Feb. 11 due to recent market and financial conditions.

The firm said at the time that it was working with investors and clients to reach a swift resolution and restore liquidity to the platform. CoinDesk subsequently learned that the crypto lender had incurred losses of around $75 million in the recent market downturn and was seeking a buyer or emergency funding.

CoinDesk also reported that Nicholas Hammer, co-founder and CEO of Blockfills, has stepped down from his leadership role. The firm’s website now lists Joseph Perry as the interim CEO.

Blockfills said it processed over $60 billion in trading volume in 2025, a 28% increase from the prior year, and is among the more active institutional crypto lending and borrowing desks. It serves about 2,000 institutional clients, including hedge funds, asset managers and mining firms.

“The company is now hurtling towards bankruptcy,” according to insolvency professional Thomas Braziel, founder of 117 Partners.

“After something like this, no serious institution is touching the platform,” Braziel said. “They are going to have to file for bankruptcy.”

The New York Law Journal first reported news of the Dominion complaint on Monday.

Read more: Blockfills co-founder and CEO Nicholas Hammer has stepped down

38% of Altcoins Hovering Near All-Time Low Prices — Analyst

0

An estimated 38% of altcoins are now hovering near all-time lows, which is worse than the post-FTX market crash, according to CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost.

The current market is “unfavorable” for risk-on assets, and the crypto markets are the first to absorb this risk-off posturing, he said, adding:

“For comparison, this metric reached 35% in April 2025 and 37.8% just after the FTX crash. This chart perfectly illustrates the current situation for altcoins. Investors remain cautious and continue to lose interest in altcoins.” 

The percentage of altcoins trading at or near all-time lows. Source: CryptoQuant

Examples of altcoins, cryptocurrency that typically serves as an alternative to Bitcoin (BTC), include Cardano’s ADA (ADA), which is hovering at about $0.10 above its all-time low of $0.17. Polkadot (DOT) reached an all-time low of $1.13 in February, but is now up 33% from there, and Polygon (POL) is trading at about $0.02 off its all-time low of $0.08. 

Liquidity is being siphoned from altcoins and into equities and commodities, Darkfost said. Daily trading volume reached a high of over $417 billion on Oct. 10, the day of the historic crypto market crash, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Cryptocurrencies, Markets, Altcoin Watch
The Total3 metric, which tracks the market capitalization of the entire cryptocurrency market, excluding BTC and ETH, has retraced to November 2024 levels. Source: TradingView

For comparison, daily trading volumes ranged from $49.4 billion to $268 billion in February and March 2026.

The altcoin drawdown represents the “largest regression” recorded during the current market cycle, he said, and could present a buying opportunity for investors, he concluded. 

Related: $209B exited altcoins over the last 13 months: Did traders rotate into Bitcoin?

Altcoin social activity drowned out by Bitcoin

The analysis comes as mentions of altcoins on social media platforms dropped to two-year lows, according to crypto market sentiment analysis platform Santiment.

Google worldwide search volume for altcoins also dropped to the yearly low of 4 out of 100, according to data from Google Trends.

Cryptocurrencies, Markets, Altcoin Watch
Google worldwide search volume for “altcoins” is back at the one-year low. Source: Google Trends

“Altcoins are suffering from a ‘liquidity drain,’ where even minor shifts in sentiment trigger outsized sell-offs,” Jimmy Xue, co-founder of liquidity platform Axis, said in a message shared with Cointelegraph.

This is because altcoins lack the same institutional support and the “digital gold” narrative enjoyed by Bitcoin, he added.

Analysts have cited several reasons for the decline in altcoins, including too many tokens competing for limited investor capital, and the launch of BTC exchange-traded funds (ETFs), altering market dynamics by trapping liquidity in traditional financial vehicles.

There are more than 36.8 million different crypto tokens listed on CoinMarketCap at the time of this writing. 

Magazine: Brandt says Bitcoin yet to bottom, Polymarket sees hope: Trade Secrets