Home Blog Page 513

Bitcoin dip buying surges as 850K BTC cluster between $60K and $70K

0

Bitcoin may have recently looked choppy under $70,000, but a ton of BTC was traded then, in a sign of strong dip demand.

That’s evident from blockchain data, which shows the total amount of BTC that last moved on-chain in the $60,000-$70,000 range now stands at 1,845,766 BTC, up from 1,001,491 BTC on Jan. 1, according to data source Glassnode. This increase of 844,275 BTC indicates that some market participants aggressively bought the dip below $70,000.

More importantly, that 1.84 million BTC figure accounts for about 9.23% of bitcoin’s circulating supply. It means valuations below $70,000 could act as a floor because a lot of coins are “anchored” there and sellers might be reluctant to sell below it.

These numbers are derived from Glassnode’s Realized Price Distribution (URPD) metric, which shows the price levels where the current set of bitcoin UTXOs – basically, individual chunks of bitcoin in wallets – were last moved. Each bar, as seen in the feature image, represents how much bitcoin is held at a given price. This version is entity-adjusted, meaning coins held by the same owner are grouped together based on the average price they were acquired at.

While the $60,000 to $70,000 range has seen heavy activity, $70,000 to $80,000 looks relatively thin, according to Glassnode. Just 400,000 BTC sit in this range, which is nearly half of the amount transacted below $70,000.

Bitcoin has bounced back above $70,000 following the temporary ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran. The cryptocurrency spent a better part of the past five weeks or so trading back and forth below $70,000. Yet, it remained resilient relative to traditional risk assets, such as stocks, which wilted as Iran war lifted per barrel oil prices above $100.

Ethereum Faces Speed vs Security Tradeoff With Quantum Shift

0

The quantum threat: Real, but not immediate

Ethereum relies on cryptographic systems that remain secure against classical computers. However, sufficiently advanced quantum machines could one day break these systems, potentially exposing private keys and putting billions of dollars in value at risk.

Ethereum’s post-quantum initiative sends a clear message: there is no immediate threat, yet delaying action is not an option.

Upgrading a global, decentralized network is a complex, multiyear effort that requires:

For that reason, Ethereum is targeting quantum-safe readiness around 2029, well before the threat is expected to become practical.

Why quantum-safe cryptography could slow Ethereum down

At first glance, quantum-safe cryptography comes with a key tradeoff: many post-quantum schemes are more resource-intensive than the cryptographic systems Ethereum uses today.

Compared with today’s cryptographic signatures, most post-quantum alternatives tend to:

  • generate larger signatures, increasing the amount of data per transaction

  • require more computational resources for verification

  • lack efficient built-in aggregation capabilities

This creates three key challenges for Ethereum:

Bandwidth and storage

Larger signatures result in:  

Computation costs

Validators are responsible for verifying signatures. If those signatures become more complex:

Loss of efficiency in aggregation

Ethereum’s consensus layer currently benefits from Boneh-Lynn-Shacham (BLS) signatures, which allow efficient aggregation. Most quantum-safe schemes do not support this capability natively, creating a significant scalability hurdle.

The consensus layer problem

The most significant performance risk lies in Ethereum’s consensus layer. Thousands of validators currently submit attestations that are efficiently aggregated through BLS signatures. This helps maintain:

Many quantum-safe alternatives do not currently offer the same level of efficiency, especially in areas such as aggregation.

If Ethereum were to simply replace BLS with a heavier alternative, the network could face:

  • slower block propagation

  • higher validator load

  • lower overall efficiency

Did you know? Ethereum is not replacing signatures outright. Instead, it is using SNARKs to compress thousands of heavy proofs into a single, compact cryptographic receipt.

Ethereum’s solution: Don’t replace but redesign

Instead of accepting a performance slowdown, Ethereum developers are pursuing a smarter path: redesigning the system to operate within quantum-safe constraints. The core idea is SNARK-based aggregation.

What does this involve?

Rather than verifying thousands of large signatures one by one, the network verifies a single compact cryptographic proof that attests to the validity of all the underlying signatures.

This method:

  • compresses large amounts of data into compact proofs

  • reduces verification overhead

  • helps maintain scalability

Put simply, Ethereum is working to rebuild efficiency on top of more resource-intensive cryptography.

Execution layer: Where users feel it

The execution layer, where wallets and transactions operate, is where users would feel the effects most directly.

Potential adjustments include:

  • modestly higher gas costs due to more complex signature verification

  • updated wallet designs that leverage account abstraction

  • a phased migration rather than an abrupt, network-wide transition

The goal is to minimize disruption while allowing:

  • the old and new cryptographic systems to operate alongside each other

  • users to upgrade on their own timeline

  • developers to adapt in a controlled manner

Did you know? Quantum-safe upgrades are not just about security. They represent a full-stack challenge involving cryptography, networking, economics and wallet design. Ethereum is turning a potential headache into an engineering opportunity.

The hidden cost: Data and network load

Quantum-safe cryptography affects more than individual transactions. It also places additional strain on Ethereum’s data layer.

Larger cryptographic elements can:

  • increase pressure on data availability systems

  • affect blob storage used in scaling solutions

  • complicate network propagation

That is why Ethereum’s roadmap includes upgrades across multiple layers, rather than focusing solely on signature replacements.

The real tradeoff: Security vs. efficiency, or both

At its core, the discussion goes beyond speed alone. It is about striking the right balance among:

  • security (protection against quantum attacks)

  • performance (throughput and latency)

  • cost (gas fees and validator resources)

  • decentralization (keeping node requirements accessible)

If handled poorly, quantum-safe upgrades could lead to:

However, if executed well, they could:

Did you know? Without careful engineering, quantum-safe cryptography could raise gas fees and push smaller validators out. Ethereum’s multilayer approach aims to keep the network fast, affordable and truly decentralized.

Why Ethereum is moving carefully

Ethereum is intentionally avoiding a rush toward any single solution. There are several reasons for this.

Choosing the wrong cryptographic system could:

  • introduce new vulnerabilities

  • lock the network into inefficient designs

  • open attack surfaces that did not previously exist

Instead, developers are prioritizing cryptographic agility:

  • the ability to upgrade algorithms over time as needed

  • the flexibility to respond to new discoveries

  • the avoidance of irreversible tradeoffs

Will quantum-safe cryptography slow down Ethereum?

The push toward quantum-safe cryptography is revealing a deeper reality. This is not just a security issue. It is a full-stack engineering challenge spanning cryptography, networking, economics and user experience.

If Ethereum were to adopt quantum-safe cryptography without redesigning its underlying architecture, the network would almost certainly become heavier, slower, and more expensive to run.

But that is not the strategy Ethereum is following. Instead, it is using several technologies to absorb the overhead of quantum security without passing the costs on to users:

  • SNARK-based aggregation

  • account abstraction

  • protocol-level redesign

  • multilayer optimization

Ethereum is working to absorb the overhead of quantum security without burdening users with the consequences.

What Will Sustain BTC Price Breakout?

0

Bitcoin (BTC) surged to $72,700 during Tuesday’s New York trading session as oil fell below $100 per barrel after US President Donald Trump confirmed a two-week ceasefire with Iran. 

Key takeaways:

  • Bitcoin bounced 7% to $72,700 on Tuesday after the US and Iran agreed to a two-week ceasefire.

  • Over $431 million in short positions have been liquidated in the last 24 hours.

  • Traders say Bitcoin price must decisively break the $72,000-$76,000 range to confirm trend change.

Bitcoin hits three-week high with 7% rebound

Data from TradingView showed BTC price rose as much as 7.4% to $72,760 from a low of $67,274 on Tuesday, recouping all the losses made over the last 20 days. The last time BTC/USD traded above $72,000 was on March 18.

BTC/USD one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

The price reacted to Trump’s confirmation of a two-week ceasefire agreement with Iran, conditional on “complete, immediate, and safe opening,” of the Strait of Hormuz.

Source: TruthSocial/Donald J. Trump

“Geopolitics moves crypto faster than any TA. One post from Trump and billions flow back into markets,” analyst Mr Brondor said in response to Bitcoin’s reaction following the news.

The move in Bitcoin was accompanied by $431 million in short liquidations over the last 24 hours, with BTC short liquidations accounting for $214.8 million.

Related: Bitcoin holds $67K support as data exposes price to sentiment divergence

This brought the total liquidations across the crypto market over the last 24 hours to $610 million.

Oil, which had spiked above $110–$118 per barrel amid the conflict, dropped by as much as 16% to $92 from an intraday high of $110, while WTI crude dropped to $90, before recovering to $95, at the time of writing. 

CFDs on WTI crude oil one-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Commenting on BTC price action, trading company QCP Capital held the view that despite its gains, the broader setup remains fragile.

“Hormuz reopening is conditional, infrastructure damage has already occurred, and Friday’s talks will need to deliver tangible progress,” it wrote in its latest Market Color update, adding:

“For now, the key question is whether that relief rally can hold through the next cluster of catalysts, including Fed minutes, CPI, and the first real diplomatic test of this two-week pause.”

BTC price trend change still in question

Bitcoin still faces bearish hurdles to recovery, with traders concerned about a bear-flag breakdown repeating on the daily chart.

“BTC bulls still have a lot of work to do,” crypto trader Jelle said in a post on X, adding,

“The argument for a bearish flag into key resistance remains strong.”

The analyst warned his followers not to get “euphoric” about the latest relief rally as it may be delayed by resistance from the flag’s upper boundary, which is within the $72,000-$76,000 supply zone, as shown in the chart below.

BTC/USD daily chart. Source: X/Jelle

“Bitcoin reclaimed $72,000, but bears are waiting at this level,” fellow analyst Crypto Patel said, adding that Bitcoin will “decide the next move” once it breaks above $76,000. 

“HTF close above $76K → high chances BTC pushes toward $86K–$90K.  Rejection from $76K → Next leg down below $60,000.”

BTC/USD daily chart. Source: X/Crypto Patel

As Cointelegraph continues to report, numerous traders expect fresh leg down for BTC/USD toward the 200-week moving average and the realized price, which have historically marked bear market bottoms.