The move is the latest in an escalating feud and comes just weeks after Sun filed a lawsuit against World Liberty Financial for freezing his WLFI, alongside other allegations.
The Trump family-linked crypto company World Liberty Financial has filed a defamation lawsuit against TRON founder Justin Sun, escalating a feud that has been simmering for months. The firm announced the move in an X thread today, May 4.
According to World Liberty Financial, Sun “engaged in prohibited transactions,” including allegedly transferring tokens to Binance. Last September, as The Defiant reported at the time, World Liberty blacklisted a wallet associated with Sun containing 500 WLFI. Reports said Sun had transferred some of the funds to another exchange, HTX.
In its X post today, World Liberty Financial alleges that Sun then “launched a coordinated media smear campaign” against the company.
In November 2024, Sun announced he had become the largest investor in World Liberty Financial after a $30 million purchase of WLFI. He went on to invest another $45 million in the firm.
The defamation lawsuit is the latest in a public feud between the two parties since the wallet blacklisting. Just last month, Sun filed a lawsuit against World Liberty Financial alleging that the firm wrongfully froze his WLFI holdings, blocked his token holder governance rights, and threatened to burn Sun’s tokens.
Notably, World Liberty’s defamation lawsuit doesn’t appear to address or deny Sun’s allegations directly, but rather focuses on alleging a “coordinated smear campaign” to attack the company’s reputation.
Sun responded to the lawsuit on X today, calling it “nothing more than a meritless PR stunt,” adding:
“I stand by my actions and look forward to defeating the case in court.”
This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.
Leading decentralized lending platform Aave has asked a U.S. federal court to block an attempt by victims of North Korean terrorism to seize about $71 million in crypto frozen after last month’s rsETH-related exploit, escalating a dispute that has already split Arbitrum’s governance.
The filing, submitted Monday in the Southern District of New York, seeks to vacate a restraining notice served on Arbitrum DAO by lawyers representing judgment creditors of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Aave argues the assets belong to users of its protocol, not North Korea, and warns that keeping them frozen risks “irreparable harm” to the platform and the broader DeFi ecosystem.
At the center of the fight is 30,765 ETH that Arbitrum’s Security Council froze after the April exploit, when attackers used improperly valued or unbacked rsETH as collateral on Aave, contributing to a situation that the plaintiffs allege resulted in approximately $230 million in ETH being withdrawn from the Aave Protocol. Some of those funds were later intercepted and immobilized on Arbitrum, with plans to return them to affected users as part of a coordinated recovery effort.
The dispute centers on whether stolen property briefly held by hackers becomes their legal property.
The plaintiffs, three sets of judgment creditors holding $877 million in damages awards against North Korea, argue it does — and that’s because the rsETH attackers are widely believed to be linked to Pyongyang’s Lazarus Group, the recovered ether can be claimed against those decades-old judgments.
Aave’s lawyers call that theory “flatly wrong” and warn it would punish blameless users while rewriting basic property law.
Aave’s motion challenges that theory directly. The filing argues the restrained ETH “belong[s] to completely blameless third parties,” not to North Korea, and that even if a thief briefly held the assets, that does not confer legal ownership.
It also disputes the underlying attribution, calling claims that the exploit was carried out by DPRK actors “conjecture” based on unverified reports.
Aave is asking the court to immediately lift the restraining notice, or at a minimum to suspend it while the case is heard.
Aave says keeping the funds frozen via the restraining notice could deepen losses and destabilize DeFi markets already strained by the exploit. The filing warns this “increases the likelihood of cascading liquidations, sustained liquidity outflows, and irreversible changes to user positions,” a chain reaction the industry has been trying to avoid for two weeks.
The outcome could have consequences far beyond this case. If courts allow seized or recovered crypto to be claimed by outside creditors, it could deter future rescue efforts and complicate how the industry responds to hacks, where speed and coordination are often the only tools to limit damage.
At TSAM London 2026, Ralf Spöth and Marc Schwarz from Profidata shared some valuable insights into the evolving landscape of asset management technology. While some things in the industry haven’t changed much over the last two decades but the need for reliable, clean data is still at the heart of everything. Spöth pointed out that the real shift is happening right now and the big focus for this year and beyond is making that high-quality data accessible to AI systems, ensuring that firms are ready for the next wave of innovation.
Schwarz highlighted that when a firm partners with Profidata, the most immediate benefit is the implementation of a single, unified data layer and this isn’t just about technical tidiness; it’s about creating a foundation for the future. Over the first year, clients typically see a massive leap in data clarity, which is the essential first step for any successful AI adoption. Beyond the tech benefits, Schwarz noted that this efficiency translates into tangible cost and time efficiencies.
The end goal for Profidata is always centered on the success of their partners as by streamlining their operations and cutting through data complexity, Profidata are helping their clients focus on what really matters: “achieve more alpha”.
The crypto rally extended into Monday, with traders pricing in the CLARITY Act compromise and Trump’s “Project Freedom” Hormuz operation.
Crypto markets opened the week firmly in the green, with Bitcoin reclaiming $80,000, Ether pushing toward $2,400, and altcoin breadth widening as multiple policy and geopolitical catalysts converged over the weekend.
Bitcoin is trading at $80,292, up 1.9% on the day and 4.8% on the week, capping a four-session recovery from last week’s $75,500 low. Total crypto market capitalization climbed 1.5% to $2.74 trillion on $127.6 billion in 24-hour volume, per CoinGecko.
BTC Chart
Ether rose 1.6% to $2,367, up 4% on the week. Solana climbed 1% to $85, BNB added 1.2% to $627, and XRP held the $1.40 level with a 0.7% daily gain. Meanwhile, Dogecoin rallied 2.2% on the day and 14% on the week.
ETF Bid Resumes
U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs took in $629 million in net inflows on Friday, per SoSoValue data, the strongest day in three weeks. Spot Ether ETFs added $101 million in the same session, snapping a four-day outflow streak that had bled roughly $184 million between April 27 and April 30.
April closed as the best month of 2026 for spot BTC ETFs, with net inflows of roughly $1.97 billion, led by BlackRock’s IBIT. Cumulative net inflows since the January 2024 launch sit at $58.72 billion, still shy of the $61.19 billion record set in October when BTC printed its $126,000 all-time high.
BitMine Immersion Technologies (BMNR) crossed 5 million ETH in holdings last week with a 101,901 ETH purchase, lifting total holdings to 5,078,386 ETH worth approximately $11.85 billion at current prices.
CLARITY Act Compromise Text Drops
The bigger structural catalyst landed late Friday. Senators Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) released compromise text on the stablecoin yield carveout in the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act, the single biggest sticking point holding up the bill since January.
The language bars stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield “economically or functionally equivalent” to a bank deposit, but preserves activity-based reward programs tied to “bona fide activities” on crypto platforms.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong responded with a two-word post on X, saying, “Mark it up.”
Polymarket odds of the CLARITY Act becoming law in 2026 jumped by nearly 20 percentage points to 64% on the news.
Source: Polymarket
Project Freedom
President Trump announced Sunday that the U.S. military will begin “Project Freedom,” an operation to guide ships stranded in the Strait of Hormuz out of the waterway, per a Truth Social post Trump described as a “humanitarian gesture.” U.S. Central Command confirmed in a separate statement that the mission will involve guided-missile destroyers, more than 100 aircraft, and 15,000 service members.
Iran’s parliamentary national security commission warned that any U.S. interference in the strait would violate the April 8 ceasefire.
Crude staying sticky above $100 has been the dominant macro overhang on crypto since the war started in late February. Any sustained move back toward double digits would alleviate inflation fears that have kept rate-cut expectations on ice.
The Senate Banking Committee now has a narrow window to schedule the CLARITY Act markup. The week of May 11 is the earliest possible date, ahead of the Memorial Day recess starting on May 21.
Decentralized finance protocol Aave filed an emergency motion on Monday in New York to vacate a restraining notice from a US law firm aimed at blocking Arbitrum DAO from transferring 30,766 frozen Ether to the victims of the Kelp exploit.
Gerstein Harrow LLP served Arbitrum DAO with a restraining notice on Friday, arguing its clients are owed over $877 million in default judgments against North Korea. The law firm claims the North Korean hacker group behind the Kelp exploit had possession of the tokens, giving its clients a legal claim over the Ether.
Aave filed the emergency motion in a New York district court, arguing that a thief doesn’t gain lawful ownership of property by stealing it. It also argued that North Korea is only suspected of being part of the theft, and that the law firm’s argument “defies logic, common sense and the law.”
The Arbitrum DAO has been voting on whether to release the Ether to assist DeFi United, an industrywide coordination effort to make rsETH holders whole and help restore rsETH’s backing following the $292 million Kelp DAO hack on April 18. Voting ends Thursday.
Source: Aave
Delay will cause “irreparable harm” to Aave, crypto ecosystem
Aave argued that if the court upholds Gerstein Harrow’s notice, it could deter future recovery efforts for North Korea-related hacks because of the possibility of additional legal challenges to recover funds. It further argued that it could incentivize bad actors to target more crypto protocols.
Aave’s lawyers also warned that the delay is causing “irreparable harm” to the protocol, its users and the wider DeFi community, “none of which can be later cured by monetary damages.”
“If the immobilized assets remain subject to a freeze and are not made available to restore value to Aave protocol users, the entire DeFi ecosystem risks being destabilized,” Aave’s lawyers said.
“While Aave protocol users cannot retrieve their assets from the Aave protocol, if those assets were being used for collateral for other positions elsewhere then continued restraint on the immobilized assets may render those users unable to meet their related collateral obligations.”
Aave said that if a court upholds Gerstein Harrow’s notice, it could incentivize bad actors to target more crypto protocols. Source: CourtListener
They further argued against Gerstein Harrow’s claim that its clients have a right to the frozen Ether and also said the case is based on unsupported conjecture that the thief is North Korea.
“Plaintiffs in this case showed up, contending – based on conjecture from posts on the internet – that the thief was North Korea, and that by stealing the assets for a few hours, North Korea somehow became the rightful owner of those assets such that Plaintiffs here could restrain them for their own purposes,” lawyers for Aave said.
“The immobilized assets do not belong to North Korea or any affiliated entities. Instead, the immobilized assets belong to the users of the Aave protocol who were victimized when a third-party thief effectively stole their assets during a cyber exploit April 18, 2026.”
Related: Google Cloud flags North Korea-linked crypto malware campaign
If the court can’t immediately vacate the notice, Aave’s lawyers are requesting that Gerstein Harrow pay a $300 million bond to maintain the restraining notice until a decision is reached.
A judge hasn’t ruled on the emergency motion yet, and a hearing date hasn’t been scheduled.
Gerstein Harrow has filed similar cases in the past, arguing its clients have a claim to funds stolen by North Korea and frozen by crypto firms, including assets from the 2023 Heco Bridge hack and the 2025 Bybit exploit.
Magazine: DeFi’s billion-dollar secret: The insiders responsible for hacks
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.
News that Iran had struck a petroleum facility in the United Arab Emirates sent oil prices surging on the day, with US stocks under pressure.
WTI crude added over 5% to return past $105 per barrel, while Brent hit $119 per barrel — within striking distance of its highest levels in nearly three years.
CFDs on Brent crude oil one-day chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView
Earlier, trading company QCP Capital described the Iran situation as “fluid.”
“For now, markets appear to be pricing in de-escalation. That calculus could change quickly,” it wrote in its latest Market Color analysis.
For Bitcoin itself, QCP argued that the semi-filled gap in CME Group’s futures market formed the key resistance hurdle for buyers to overcome.
“Opened up with a new small CME gap. It is also well on its way to close the previous large gap from $84K,” trader Daan Crypto Trades continued on the topic in a post on X.
“Good to mark these levels on your chart as they could act as a ‘magnet’ and local reversal zones if price trades close/into them.”
Bitcoin speculators almost wipe out unrealized losses
Onchain analytics platform CryptoQuant added another important level in the form of the aggregate cost basis of Bitcoin’s short-term holders, or speculative investors holding for up to six months.
Related: BTC price can ‘easily’ hit $95K: Five things to know in Bitcoin this week
“The more probable scenario is a cautious recovery attempt toward STH realized price,” contributor Crazzyblockk wrote in a QuickTake blog post.
“A confirmed daily close above $81,500 flips that level from resistance to support, opening the path toward $87–92K. Failure sends price back to test new money realized price near $76,500.”
Bitcoin aggregate cost basis (realized price) by UTXO age (screenshot). Source: CryptoQuant
Crazzyblockk added that Bitcoin’s long-term holders were “unbothered” about their average 27% unrealized losses.
This article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or recommendations. All investments and trades carry risk; readers are encouraged to conduct independent research.
Bitcoin BTC$80,914.99 continues to rally, defying the typical inflation playbook. It’s raising the question of whether the cryptocurrency has quietly crossed over from risk asset to inflation hedge.
The leading cryptocurrency by market value has risen 19% in just over a month, topping $80,000 on Monday for the first time since January. The rally comes as oil hovers above $100 and Bloomberg’s commodity futures index has jumped to a decade high, pointing to inflation in the pipeline. Meanwhile, U.S. consumer inflation expectations are surging.
In the standard playbook, this combination is considered bearish for bitcoin. Rising inflation means the Federal Reserve is likely to keep interest rates higher for longer, while higher rates mean attractive returns on supposedly safe assets such as U.S. Treasury notes and less incentive to invest in yield-less assets like bitcoin. This logic has worked several times before, most notably in 2022, when the Fed hiked rates aggressively to tame inflation, which partially catalyzed that year’s bitcoin crash.
This time is different
But this time, bitcoin is not following that script. Some analysts are acknowledging the disconnect plainly, raising questions about the durability of the rally. Others say something more fundamental is happening.
“Macro signals remain divided, with commodities pricing supply-side stress while risk assets continue to trade higher. This divergence highlights a growing disconnect across asset classes and raises questions about the durability of the current risk-on environment,” analysts at prominent and long-running exchange Bitfinex said in a report shared with CoinDesk.
Inflation hedge
A different interpretation is gaining traction, suggesting a shift in how BTC is used: from a risk asset to an inflation hedge. And this interpretation is not just circumstantial but backed by renewed inflows into the spot ETFs.
Since March, the 11 U.S.-listed spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds have raised $4.45 billion in investor capital, nearly reversing the massive outflows during the autumn that weighed on the spot price at the time. Most of these inflows are seemingly bullish directional bets rather than the once-popular non-directional arbitrage play, which has not fallen out of investor favor.
“The more interesting shift is happening on the institutional side. Continued inflows into bitcoin ETFs point to a broader change in how hedging is approached. Gold is no longer the default — digital assets are increasingly being considered alongside it, not after it,” Ryan Lee, chief analyst at Bitget Research, said in an email.
Paul Howard, senior director at crypto liquidity provider Wincent, also sees bitcoin as an inflation hedge and has a price target for it. “As both an inflation hedge and a highly liquid store of value, bitcoin possesses several characteristics that could support a 3.5 times increase in price over the next three years,” he said in an email.
The view that BTC is an inflation hedge is no longer confined to crypto circles.
Last week, Paul Tudor Jones, one of the most respected macro traders alive, the man who correctly called and traded the 1987 stock market crash, came out with the most direct endorsement of the bitcoin inflation hedge thesis heard from a Wall Street heavyweight.
“Bitcoin is, unequivocally, the best inflation hedge there is,” Jones said in an interview on the Invest Like the Best podcast. “More than gold.”
His reasoning is structural. Unlike gold, whose supply increases by a couple of per cent each year, bitcoin has a finite supply that can be mined. In a world where central banks have demonstrated a clear willingness to boost the money supply, own the thing they cannot print more of.
Don’t forget stocks
Here is the honest caveat that the bullish inflation hedge narrative needs to reckon with.
Right now, U.S. equities are on a tear, and that is offering positive cues to bitcoin and the broader risk complex, as we noted Monday. In this environment, it is therefore genuinely difficult to draw a definitive conclusion that BTC has evolved into an inflation hedge and that the hedging bid, rather than the risk-on bid, is driving BTC higher.
“After a solid April, BTC has begun May on firm footing, breaking above $80k for the first time since January 31. The move appears aligned with equities, reinforcing a broader trend as BTC’s correlation with US stocks climbing back toward 2023 levels, signaling a renewed linkage with risk assets broadly,” Singapore-based digital assets trading firm QCP Capital said in a market note.
The real test of the inflation hedge narrative comes if and when equities turn lower. If bitcoin holds or rises during an equity sell-off, the narrative gets confirmed. But if it falls alongside equities, the risk asset label will stick.
That test has not arrived yet. Until then, the inflation thesis remains compelling.
Ripple is now sharing its internal threat intelligence on North Korean hackers with the crypto industry, the company said Monday, in a move that reframes how the sector is responding to a shift in DPRK attack methodology.
The Drift hack was not a hack in the way most people think of one.
Nobody found a bug or exploited a smart contract. North Korean operatives spent months befriending Drift’s contributors, slipped malware onto their machines, and walked off with the keys. By the time the $285 million moved, every system that was supposed to catch a hack had nothing to flag.
That is the version of events Ripple and Crypto ISAC, the crypto industry’s threat-sharing group, laid out Monday alongside news that Ripple is now sharing its internal data on North Korean threat actors with the rest of the sector.
The 2022-24 wave of more DeFi hacks was centred on exploiting code, with attackers finding smart contract vulnerabilities and draining protocols in minutes.
But as security gets tighter, the modus operandi shifts from technology to people. Rogue operatives apply for jobs at crypto firms, pass background checks, show up on Zoom calls and build trust for months. Then they deploy attacks that no traditional security tool was built to catch, because the attacker is already inside.
Ripple is now feeding Crypto ISAC the kind of profile data that makes that pattern legible across companies. LinkedIn profiles, email addresses, locations, contact numbers — or the connective tissue that lets a security team recognise the candidate they just interviewed as the same operative who failed background checks at three other firms last week.
“The strongest security posture in crypto is a shared one,” Ripple posted on X. “A threat actor who fails a background check at one company will apply to three more that same week. Without shared intelligence, every company starts from zero.”
Lazarus Group’s reach across the crypto sector is now visible enough that it has begun reshaping legal proceedings as well as security ones.
On Monday, an attorney representing victims of North Korean terrorism served restraining notices on Arbitrum DAO, arguing that the 30,765 ETH frozen after April’s Kelp bridge exploit is North Korean property under U.S. enforcement law.
Lending company Aave has since disputed that filing in support of Arbitrum, arguing that a “thief does not gain lawful ownership of stolen property simply by taking it.”
The Kelp breach had drained $292 million in ether (ETH) and was also publicly attributed to Lazarus Group operatives, putting April’s Drift and Kelp losses together at more than half a billion dollars tied to a single state actor in the span of a single month.
Whether industry-level intelligence sharing actually slows the campaigns is the open question. The same operatives may already be in the next round of interviews somewhere.
Delivering immersive in-game rewards and expanding how players play, connect, and compete
Electronic Arts Inc. (NASDAQ: EA), a global leader in interactive entertainment, today announced a landmark, multi-year collaboration with Visa (NYSE: V), the world’s leader in digital payments, to deliver the next generation of immersive, player-first experiences across EA SPORTS™ franchises.
Visa is partnering with EA SPORTS franchises EA SPORTS FC™ and EA SPORTS™ College Football, offering in-game rewards and experiences for EA SPORTS’ global community of fans. By combining EA’s interactive, participatory platforms with Visa’s expansive global brand, this partnership demonstrates how the line between sports fandom and video games continues to blur as audiences increasingly play, watch, and connect across both physical and virtual sports.
“We’re thrilled to be partnering with Visa for one of Electronic Arts’ most expansive brand partnerships to date, bringing more value to fans,” said David Tinson, Chief Experiences Officer at Electronic Arts. “At EA, we bring together a global community of hundreds of millions of fans through interactive play and fandom. That gives us a unique platform to connect sports, players, and culture in meaningful ways. Together with Visa, we’re building for the long term to create more connected, rewarding experiences for fans across some of the biggest moments in sports.”
The partnership will introduce immersive experiences that feel organic, premium and contextually relevant, leveraging dynamic technology designed to enhance gameplay without disrupting the experience. EA SPORTS will create tailored content as part of the partnership to drive meaningful and measurable value for partners and players alike.
“Interactive entertainment has become the new stadium for sports fans around the world, and our partnership with Electronic Arts and EA SPORTS puts Visa at the heart of that experience,” said Frank Cooper, Global Chief Marketing Officer at Visa. “Together, we’re creating meaningful ways for fans to engage with the sports they love, blending digital gameplay and real-world moments while making it more rewarding to play, engage, and connect through Visa and our many partners.”
Key highlights will include:
Player-First In-Game Experiences:
Within EA SPORTS FC, players can participate in limited-time challenges and live moments that grant in-game rewards as they play and compete.
In EA SPORTS College Football, players can unlock in-game name, image, likeness (NIL) sponsorship opportunities within the game’s career mode, Road to Glory, reflecting how real college athletes partner with brands. As players accept branded deals, they receive boosts to their stats and attributes, mirroring real-world sponsorship opportunities for athletes.
Rewards That Extend Play and Community: Players around the world can earn in-game rewards and participate in a branded Visa Objective in EA SPORTS FC 26, including Squad Building Challenges and a branded Visa Live Game Mode. In EA SPORTS College Football, players can participate in Visa-themed College Ultimate Team (CUT) challenges, featuring curated objectives, lineup-building moments, and limited-time events, to earn in-game rewards and engage more deeply with the Ultimate Team experience.
Celebrating the Biggest Moments in Sports and Culture: The partnership comes to life at marquee sports moments like the Visa Infinite lounge experience at the EA SPORTS Presents Madden Bowl event during Super Bowl LX week, elevating the fan experience with immersive, premium moments that blend competition, entertainment, and culture, while celebrating the energy and passion of the player fandom.
Bitcoin BTC$80,953.41 just gave the options desks the breakout they were positioning for.
The largest crypto crossed $81,000 in Asian hours Tuesday, its highest level since late January, up from $79,000 at the end of U.S. trading hours on Monday and 5.3% higher on the week.
Other majors traded mixed. Ether held $2,379, off 0.1% on the day but up 4.0% on the week. XRP slipped 0.9% to $1.40. Solana dropped 0.9% to $84.84. BNB sat at $626. Dogecoin gave back 1.0% to $0.1117 after last week’s run, though it remains the standout on the seven-day tape at 12.4% as futures open interest continues to sit at year-highs.
The move came despite Brent crude paring just to $113 a barrel after surging 5.8% Monday on Iran’s disputed missile claim, with WTI near $104.
The macro picture has not actually improved, even as developments in the ongoing U.S.-Iran seem to be losing their grip on bitcoin.
U.S. destroyers Truxtun and Mason transited the Strait of Hormuz overnight, escorting two U.S.-flagged vessels through under what U.S. Central Command described as “coordinated threats.” A VTTI oil terminal in Fujairah was struck in an aerial attack. President Donald Trump told Salem News Channel the war may last another two to three weeks, meaning a previously announced four-week ceasefire is fraying.
Options markets are showing a flurry of action with bets on higher prices in the days ahead, Nomura’s market making arm Laser Digital flagged in a note shared with CoinDesk on Tuesday.
Bitcoin volatility has been quiet for most of the past week. Traders were not buying much in the way of options protection, and the price was not moving fast enough to justify it. When desks did pay for protection, they paid more for puts (bets on the price falling) than calls (bets on it rising) – the standard playbook in a market that is more worried about a drop than excited about a rally.
But underneath that, there has been quiet demand for cheap upside bets, structured through what traders call call ratio strategies. The trade involves buying call options that pay off if bitcoin rallies a little, and financing those by selling other call options that only pay off if bitcoin rallies a lot. The setup costs almost nothing upfront and benefits if bitcoin grinds higher without ripping past the upper level.
“Should the spot price experience a decisive breakout above $80K, the currently negative BTC risk reversal is expected to move into positive territory,” the note said.
A risk reversal is the difference in implied volatility between equally out-of-the-money calls and puts. When it sits negative, the market is pricing more fear of a drop than greed for a rally.
A flip to positive would be the first signal that options markets have actually shifted from cautious to constructive.
All major central banks held rates last week, which Laser Digital said reduces the right-tail distribution of rates and keeps U.S. financial conditions in their current range. Strategy reports earnings Tuesday, and the U.S. nonfarm payrolls print drops Friday. Both can move bitcoin if the surprise is large enough.
