Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure
Blockchain analysts had it wrong — by a wide margin. When SpaceX filed its S-1 registration statement with US securities regulators ahead of its planned June 12 stock market debut, the company disclosed Bitcoin holdings that were more than double what tracking firms had estimated.
A Closer Look At The Numbers
SpaceX reported owning 18,712 Bitcoin valued at roughly $1.45 billion as of March 31. That figure caught much of the crypto world off guard.
Companies like BitcoinTreasuries.NET and Arkham had pegged the company’s holdings at around 8,285 Bitcoin — less than half the actual amount.
The coins were purchased at an average price of $35,320 each, according to the SEC filing. At current prices, the position represents a substantial gain.
SpaceX Form S-1 filing with the SEC.
The disclosure places SpaceX seventh among publicly listed companies by Bitcoin holdings. That ranking is set to become official once the company completes its IPO, which would push it past several well-known names in the corporate Bitcoin space.
Bigger Than Tesla
SpaceX’s stash also puts it ahead of Tesla, the electric vehicle company also led by Elon Musk. Tesla holds 11,509 Bitcoin — roughly 7,000 fewer coins.
Both companies began buying Bitcoin around the same time. Reports indicate SpaceX started accumulating the cryptocurrency in early 2021, right around when Tesla made its own move into digital assets. The parallel timing suggests Bitcoin adoption across Musk’s companies was no coincidence.
SpaceX’s BTC holdings as of Dec. 31, 2025. Source: SEC
The IPO itself carries numbers that are hard to ignore. SpaceX is aiming to raise around $75 billion, with an estimated company valuation ranging from $1.75 trillion to $2 trillion.
If achieved, it would rank as the largest public offering in capital markets history. The company says it is targeting what it described in its filing as the largest addressable market in human history — a $28.5 trillion opportunity spanning artificial intelligence, space exploration, and global connectivity.
BTCUSD now trading at $77,566. Chart: TradingView
A New Layer For Investors
Once SpaceX begins trading, its stock will offer investors something beyond aerospace exposure. Owning shares would also mean indirect access to one of the largest corporate Bitcoin positions among public companies.
That combination — rockets, satellites, AI ambitions, and a billion-dollar crypto holding — gives the offering a profile unlike most traditional IPOs.
SpaceX joins a short list of major corporations that have moved Bitcoin onto their balance sheets in a meaningful way.
The company’s filing makes clear the position was not a small experiment. Nearly 19,000 coins held over several years points to a deliberate, long-term strategy — one that was largely hidden from public view until now.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
Detailed May 18 post-mortem traces a six-week breach to DPRK group TraderTraitor and locks in a new 3-of-3 DVN protocol default. Kelp says LayerZero approved the configuration and has migrated rsETH bridging to Chainlink.
LayerZero Labs published a detailed forensic report on the April 18 KelpDAO bridge exploit on Sunday. The report, produced with cybersecurity firms Mandiant, CrowdStrike, and zeroShadow, contains a previously unreported claim about how KelpDAO’s bridge was configured before the attack.
According to LayerZero, the bridge for rsETH (KelpDAO’s liquid restaking token, a derivative representing staked and restaked ETH) had at some prior point been configured with a 2-of-2 stack of Decentralized Verifier Networks, or DVNs — the parties responsible for confirming whether a cross-chain message is legitimate. LayerZero says the configuration was then changed by Kelp to a 1-of-1 setup, leaving LayerZero Labs as the sole required verifier.
“A previous 2-of-2 configuration had been modified by the application owner to a 1-of-1 configuration which used only the LayerZero Labs DVN,” the report states.
LayerZero does not specify when the change occurred, who made it, or why. Kelp has not directly addressed the 2-of-2 claim in any public statement reviewed for this story.
In prior communications, Kelp has maintained that the 1-of-1 setup was LayerZero’s documented default for new deployments and that LayerZero personnel approved it during Kelp’s expansion to layer-2 networks. Kelp has published screenshots it says corroborate those communications, and has cited industry data estimating that roughly 47% of LayerZero’s ~2,665 deployed applications were running 1-of-1 configurations at the time of the attack. LayerZero has not publicly responded to the screenshots.
What LayerZero says happened
According to the report, the breach began on March 6, six weeks before the funds were drained. LayerZero says one of its developers “was socially engineered” to clone a malicious GitHub repo which dropped malware on their macOS system. The malware provided remote access to the developer’s computer and enabled the attacker to harvest session keys, which were used to access LayerZero’s Remote Procedure Call (RPC) infrastructure via commercial VPNs for six weeks before executing.
On April 18, per the report, the attacker injected malicious code into op-geth — the software LayerZero’s DVN was using to read blockchain state — on two Kubernetes clusters. LayerZero says the patched servers returned forged responses to the DVN signing service while continuing to return correct data to monitoring tools, defeating real-time detection.
Simultaneous DDoS attacks on external RPC providers forced failover to the poisoned internal servers. The DVN then signed a valid attestation for a forged message, and the Ethereum bridge contract released 116,500 rsETH — about $292M — to the attacker.
Mandiant and CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity firms LayerZero retained, attribute the operation with high confidence to UNC4899 — also known as TraderTraitor — the DPRK group both firms have linked to the $1.5B Bybit Safe{Wallet} heist in February 2025.
Chainalysis’s independent framing
In a post-mortem updated alongside LayerZero’s report, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis framed the exploit as a “trust-layer failure” that contract auditing could not have caught. “At the transaction level, every step of the exploit was indistinguishable from normal bridge activity,” the firm wrote. “The failure was structural.”
Chainalysis identified the underlying issue as a broken accounting invariant: the rsETH released on Ethereum had no matching burn on the source chain, meaning supply entered circulation without backing. The firm credited Kelp’s contract pause with blocking a second forged attempt to drain $95M more, and the Arbitrum Security Council with freezing 30,766 ETH of the attacker’s downstream funds on April 20.
Prior apology
LayerZero says its DVN now refuses to sign attestations on any channel where it is the sole verifier, that protocol defaults will be raised to at least 3-of-3, that it has rebuilt the compromised cloud environment, and that it is developing a new client to enable diversity within its DVN.
The report follows a May 9 statement in which LayerZero acknowledged it had “made a mistake by allowing our DVN to act as a 1/1 DVN for high-value transactions,” reversing three weeks of statements that had assigned the configuration choice to Kelp.
The Chainlink migration
Two days after the apology, Kelp announced it was migrating rsETH bridging from LayerZero’s Omnichain Fungible Token standard to Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol, or CCIP, which requires consensus from at least 16 independent node operators. Solv Protocol separately said it is moving over $700M in tokenized Bitcoin infrastructure away from LayerZero.
LayerZero’s report did not mention user compensation. Aave’s own incident report models $124 million to $230 million in bad debt at the lending protocol.
SpaceX filed its long-awaited S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission Wednesday — and it is bringing a substantial Bitcoin position into the public markets.
The Elon Musk-led aerospace company holds 18,712 BTC, valued at approximately $1.45 billion, according to the S-1. The coins were purchased at a cost basis of $661 million, or roughly $35,000 per coin — a price Bitcoin last touched in late 2023.
That stake makes SpaceX the seventh-largest known corporate Bitcoin holder in the world, ahead of Coinbase.
SpaceX is targeting a Nasdaq listing under the ticker SPCX . The company has been valued in private markets at $1.75 trillion, a figure that would place it above Tesla by market capitalization and make it the largest public company to carry Bitcoin on its balance sheet.
SpaceX’s Bitcoin journey dates to 2021, when Musk added the cryptocurrency to the company’s financial assets around the same time Tesla made its own $1.5 billion purchase.
The company has since trimmed its holdings — Arkham Intelligence tracked the stash as low as 6,095 BTC last year — before the S-1 confirmed a far larger position of 18,712 coins held as of December 31.
SpaceX’s bitcoin gains
With a cost basis of $35,000 per coin and Bitcoin now trading above $77,000, SpaceX is sitting on paper gains of roughly $789 million. The position represents a small slice of a company that posted $18.7 billion in revenue in 2025, led by Starlink’s $11.39 billion contribution.
JUST IN: Elon Musk’s SpaceX has seen roughly $789 million in unrealized gains since purchasing their Bitcoin 🚀 pic.twitter.com/klBbGAj5x0
— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) May 21, 2026
The IPO introduces new disclosure obligations. Under FASB fair-value accounting rules that took effect in late 2025, SpaceX will report its Bitcoin exposure in quarterly filings, making the position visible to every public market investor. Future financial reports will reflect unrealized gains or losses tied to Bitcoin price swings — the same volatility that led Tesla to sell the bulk of its own holdings in 2022.
Tesla, which Musk also leads, disclosed holding more than 11,000 bitcoins in its first-quarter filing, worth close to $900 million at current prices.
When SpaceX lists, it will join Tesla on the short roster of public companies that treat Bitcoin as a balance-sheet asset — a cohort still dominated by Strategy Inc., which holds more than 843,000 BTC worth north of $64 billion.
The SpaceX S-1 is one of the most anticipated filings in years. For Bitcoin watchers, it is the most significant corporate disclosure of 2026.
Tokenized money market funds still make up only around 5% of the stablecoin universe despite their ability to generate yield, Wall Street bank JPMorgan said in a Wednesday report.
The bank said crypto market participants continue to favor stablecoins because they have become the ecosystem’s default cash instrument for trading, collateral management, settlement, cross-border payments and liquidity management across centralized exchanges (CEX) and decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols.
According to the report, money market funds face a “structural regulatory disadvantage” because they are classified as securities, subjecting them to registration, disclosure, reporting and transfer restrictions that limit their ability to circulate freely within the crypto ecosystem.
“We doubt that tokenized money market funds would grow beyond 10%-15% or so of the stablecoin universe, unless there is a regulatory change that reduces the structural disadvantage arising from tokenized money market funds classified as securities,” wrote analysts led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou.
As a result, the bank’s analysts said demand for tokenized money market funds is largely confined to crypto-native investors seeking yield on idle cash and institutional investors looking to combine blockchain-based settlement and programmability with traditional investor protections.
Advocates of tokenized money market funds say the products combine the safety and yield of traditional cash-management vehicles with the speed and flexibility of blockchain networks.
By putting fund shares onchain, tokenized funds can enable near-instant settlement, 24/7 transfers, automated compliance and more efficient collateral management. Proponents also argue that tokenization can reduce operational costs, improve transparency and allow assets to move more seamlessly across trading, treasury and payments systems
Tokenized money market funds promise faster settlement and broader access, but they still face risks tied to liquidity, counterparty exposure, regulatory uncertainty and the underlying stability of the traditional assets backing the tokens.
These tokenized funds are likely to continue growing faster than stablecoins because of their interest-bearing nature, the analysts said, but it is unlikely they will expand beyond 10%-15% of the stablecoin market absent meaningful regulatory changes.
Regulators have offered only limited support so far. The bank pointed to a streamlined Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) process introduced earlier this year to simplify the issuance and redemption of onchain money market funds. The report also highlighted emerging partnerships between traditional finance firms and crypto-native companies that allow institutions to use tokenized money market funds as off-exchange trading collateral while still earning yield.
Still, these developments are “marginal” and unlikely to overcome the broader regulatory disadvantages that prevent tokenized money market funds from matching the seamless utility of stablecoins across crypto markets, the report added.
Read more: Mike Cagney’s second act: Turning blockchain into Wall Street’s new plumbing
The crypto market showed signs of a cautious recovery on Thursday, with bitcoin BTC$77,196.00 trading at $77,900, up from Tuesday’s low of $76,100, and ether (ETH) at $2,130 after adding just 0.1% since midnight UTC.
The altcoin sector remains mixed. While Hyperliquid (HYPE) rose for a fifth straight day, adding 6.5% to notch a 53% gain over the past week, privacy coins gave back a portion of Wednesday’s gains.
U.S. equities snapped a three-day losing streak on Wednesday, with the S&P 500 index 1.5% higher as investors anticipated a strong earnings report from Nvidia (NVDA), which beat forecasts with record quarterly revenues of $81.62 billion.
Oil prices dipped as U.S. President Donald Trump said a peace deal with Iran was in its “final stages,” providing a boost to risk assets.
Derivatives positioning
Crypto futures volume increased 15% to $165.7 billion, open interest rose nearly 1% to $128 billion and liquidations jumped 72% to $266 million, ending a two-day streak of declining activity.
Hyperliquid’s HYPE token led the top 100 coins with open interest reaching the highest level since Feb. 19. Coupled with positive cumulative volume delta (CVD) and slightly positive funding, the increase suggests aggressive market-order buyers, not passive limit order buyers, are in control without yet showing signs of overheating.
A similar bullish trend was evident in privacy coin zcash (ZEC), which has dominated daily open interest rankings throughout the week.
DASH futures are also heating up. Open interest jumped 38% to 1.98 million tokens, but the “boom-bust” price rejection at $54, alongside negative CVD, suggests sellers are aggressively fading rallies with market orders.
Negative CVDs in other assets like XMR, SUI, TON, HBAR, M, BNB and CC further indicate that sellers are being aggressive with market orders rather than trading passively via limit orders.
Bitcoin’s futures market remains stagnant with open interest trapped in the 720K-750K BTC range for a seventh day. The lack of momentum is mirrored in the ether (ETH) market.
Ether’s 30-day implied volatility dropped to a 2026 low of 53%, breaking through floor levels established in late 2024, while bitcoin’s BVIV held steady near 40%, suggesting broad calm amid macro risks.
In the options market, a large block trade involved the sale of an XRP short straddle, representing a high-conviction bet on the token’s spot price remaining range-bound around $1.40 through late June.
For both BTC and ETH, the strangle has emerged as the most favored options strategy on Deribit over the past 24 hours, suggesting traders are positioning for a breakout from the current low-volatility regime.
Token talk
HYPE is justifiably receiving plaudits this week, with a gain of more than than 20% in the past 24 hours as daily trading volume has jumped 135% to $1.3 billion.
The CoinDesk Memecoin Select Index (CDMEME) fell 0.2% on Thursday and 0.9% over 24 hours. All the other CoinDesk benchmarks are higher over a 24-hour period, while the CoinDesk Computing Select Index (CPUS) outperformed its peers.
A crypto analyst pseudonamed “skew” described the altcoin market as being in a “make or break” position this week, alluding to the total crypto market cap excluding bitcoin, which has posted a series of higher highs and higher lows since February.
Speculation is ramping up again across several altcoin trading pairs, including doublezero (2Z), which has seen trading volume surge by more than 410%, leading to a 17% rise in the token over the past 24 hours.
Bitcoin BTC$77,196.00 options worth roughly $6.25 billion are set to expire on Deribit on May 29, with positioning data pointing to $75,000 and $80,000 as the key levels to watch. The $75,000 strike carries the heaviest put concentration at $394 million in notional value, while $80,000 dominates on the call side with $532 million
The max-pain price, the level at which the largest number of contracts expire worthless sits at $75,000, just under 3% below where bitcoin currently trades at $77,250. With 43,184 call contracts versus 37,351 puts, the put/call ratio of 0.86 reflects a modestly bullish market, though bitcoin’s position above max pain means downward gravitational pull remains a real consideration.
BTC Options Top Volume (Deribit)
However, the $82,000 strike is where the most attention is currently focused as of writing. Volume data shows the BTC 29MAY26 $82,000 call was the single most actively traded instrument on Thursday, with approximately 1,600 contracts ($126 million) changing hands, suggesting traders are positioning for a breakout higher rather than a retreat.
The total open interest across the expiry stands at 80,535 contracts, split between 43,184 calls and 37,351 puts.
Meanwhile, Deribit’s overall open interest has now reached $31.3 billion, overtaking BlackRock’s IBIT at $27 billion, according to checkonchain.
This is an excerpt from CoinDesk newsletter ‘Daybook.’Sign up here, if you haven’t already.
Bitcoin BTC$77,262.60, ether (ETH), XRP (XRP), solana (SOL) and other top 10 coins have had a tough time lately, with each falling at least 2% in the past seven days. Still, there is always a bull market somewhere, and several crypto sub-sectors have chalked up impressive gains.
Coins associated with derivatives protocols, particularly those focused on perpetual futures such as HYPE and LIT, have surged by 40% or more.
HYPE has been rallying since Trade.xyz, a trading interface based on the Hyperliquid blockchain, listed the Space pre-IPO perpetual contract on Monday, valuing the company at $1.78 trillion. Trading volume on the contract topped $30 million on its first day. The protocol consistently earns millions in fee revenue per week, accounting for over 40% of total marketwide fee revenue, according to data source DefiLlama.
And it’s not just Hyperliquid; investors are trading on other venues, too. According to CoinGecko, the monthly average volume on the top 12 decentralized exchanges for perpetual futures contracts has risen to $612 billion in 2026 from $532 billion in 2025.
Privacy and quantum-resistant coins such as Zcash (ZEC), Quantum Resistant Ledger’s QRL, Qubitcoin’s QTC and Starknet’s STRK are also climbing, with gains between 6% and 25%.
Data shows that investors are willing to overlook macro and geopolitical concerns and deploy capital, but only in coins with strong use cases and narratives.
Privacy is the flavor of the season, with fund managers like Arthur Hayes saying it is a fundamental necessity as advanced AI, large tech firms and government surveillance rapidly erode privacy. Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin on Wednesday outlined steps taken to bring privacy features to Ethereum, the world’s largest smart-contract blockchain.
As for quantum risks, Google researchers have already warned that a sufficiently powerful quantum machine, could in theory, attack a massive blockchain like Bitcoin with significantly fewer resources that previously estimated.
Bitcoin itself is struggling to recover the ground lost in the past seven days, currently trading around $77,300.
“Softer on final stages” talks between the U.S. and Iran “takes some inflation pressure off the tape and gives risk assets room to bounce,” analysts at Marex said.
This doesn’t, however, feel like a clean restart of the bull trend, they said, but more like a relief bid in a market that is still constrained by rates.
In traditional markets, NVDA closed Wednesday flat despite a blowout quarterly earnings report, while oil dipped to $98 per barrel. Stay alert!
Read more: For analysis of today’s activity in altcoins and derivatives, see Crypto Markets Today . For a comprehensive list of events this week, see CoinDesk’s “Crypto Week Ahead.”
What’s trending
Today’s signal
ETH’s price has dropped below key trendline support. (TradingView)
Ether’s price has dropped below the trendline connecting March and April lows. This trendline represented the recovery rally.
The breakdown, therefore, suggests an end to the price bounce and may invite more selling pressure from momentum traders, potentially yielding a deeper price slide.
The low of $1,937, from which prices turned higher in late March, is the key support now. A violation there would expose levels below $1,800.
MAPO, the native token of the Map Protocol, fell 96% on Wednesday after an exploit of the Butter Network cross-chain bridge, which allowed an attacker to mint a quadrillion MAPO tokens.
The malicious mint was tens of thousands of times larger than the legitimate supply of tokens, sending the value of MAPO from around $0.003 to $0.0001 in a matter of hours, according to CoinGecko.
The attacker used a new externally-owned account (EOA) to dump around a billion MAPO tokens, draining about 52 ETH, worth about $180,000, from Uniswap liquidity pools while retaining nearly a trillion tokens that continue to threaten other pools and potential exchange listings, reported Blockaid on Wednesday.
This latest exploit comes during a month in which at least 18 DeFi and blockchain protocols have been compromised, including THORChain, Verus Protocol’s Ethereum bridge, Transit Finance, TrustedVolumes, Ekubo, Echo Protocol and RetoSwap.
Map Protocol said the bug was in the Solidity contract layer, and it has paused the mainnet and has begun migration while the investigation continues. The Butter Network said it has paused ButterSwap, adding that user funds were not at risk.
In its latest post, the Map Protocol project said it would announce a new contract address and select an appropriate time to conduct an asset snapshot. “Any remaining tokens held by attacker-controlled addresses will be fully invalidated and will not be included in any future snapshot or conversion process,” it said.
A billion MAPO tokens were sent to Uniswap after a quadrillion tokens were minted. Source:Etherscan
The MAPO attacker first sent a legitimate oracle multisig-signed message before deploying a malicious contract at a specific address. The attacker then resent a modified “retry” message that appeared identical in hash but was actually fake. The cross-chain bridge verified it as valid and executed the massive token mint.
No private keys were stolen, and no light clients were broken; it was a classic Solidity vulnerability involving multiple dynamic fields, Blockaid explained.
Related: GitHub investigates unauthorized access to internal repositories
Map Protocol is an omnichain network for swapping Bitcoin, stablecoins and tokenized assets across blockchains, connecting the Bitcoin mainnet with ecosystems such as Ethereum, BNB Chain, Tron and Solana.
TON-TAC issues a post-mortem for $2.7 million exploit
Meanwhile, the TON-TAC asset bridge, a cross-chain bridge designed as a network extension for The Open Network, issued a post-mortem on Thursday detailing its $2.68 million exploit that occurred on May 11.
It adds to a wave of cross-chain bridge exploits over the past few weeks, including the Verus-Ethereum Bridge, Echo Bridge, and Butter Network’s cross-chain bridge.
The “security incident” stemmed from missing validation in the sequencer software, which accepted a counterfeit wallet on TON that lacked proper code-hash and minter checks, leading to another unauthorized token mint.
Recovery efforts secured about 80% of the affected assets, but the bridge remains paused for an independent audit of the patched sequencer and liquidity restoration, it added.
Magazine: DeFi’s billion-dollar secret: The insiders responsible for hacks
AI powerhouse Nvidia (NVDA) reported first-quarter earnings on Wednesday, posting revenue of $81.6 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $1.87, beating Wall Street expectations yet again as investors looked for signs that demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure remains strong enough to sustain the chipmaker’s massive rally.
Shares were volatile in after-hours trading following the results. They ended the day up about a percent on Wednesday.
Beyond the headline numbers, investors focused on four key themes: demand for Nvidia’s next-generation Blackwell chips, future products including Rubin, AI spending from hyperscalers and whether AI demand is expanding beyond model training into inference and enterprise applications.
Nvidia CFO Colette Kress said the company’s record data center revenue was “driven by the ramp of our Blackwell 300 products and demand for our InfiniBand, Spectrum-X Ethernet and NVLink solutions,” underscoring how Nvidia’s next-generation AI chips are becoming the company’s main growth engine.
Kress added that Blackwell architecture products now account for the majority of Nvidia’s revenue as the company secures additional inventory and supply commitments “to meet demand beyond the next several quarters.”
Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure
Evernorth Chief Business Officer Sagar Shah has pushed back on the idea that Ripple’s dollar-backed stablecoin RLUSD could replace XRP, arguing that the two assets are designed for different roles in on-chain finance. In a May 20 blog post, Shah said RLUSD can serve as a high-quality digital dollar, while XRP remains the neutral routing asset for cross-asset settlement, liquidity and collateral on the XRP Ledger.
The argument addresses a recurring question in the XRP community and among market observers: if RLUSD can move dollars on-chain and settle quickly, what function is still left for XRP?
Shah’s answer is that RLUSD and XRP are not competing for the same job. RLUSD, he wrote, represents a dollar leg in transactions. XRP is the asset that can sit between markets when two parties do not naturally want to trade the same asset pair.
Will RLUSD Replace XRP?
To explain the distinction, Shah used a playground trading analogy in which children try to swap snacks at recess. Direct trading becomes inefficient when one child has Goldfish, another has fruit snacks, and the person with fruit snacks wants pretzels instead of Goldfish. As the number of snacks grows, the number of possible trading pairs expands rapidly. With ten different snacks, Shah noted, there are 45 possible pairs. With 100 snacks, there are nearly 5,000.
That, he argued, mirrors the problem faced by real markets as tokenized assets proliferate.
“The chance that two specific kids happen to want each other’s exact snack at the exact same moment gets smaller and smaller,” Shah wrote. “This is the same problem real markets have. The more assets there are, the harder direct trading becomes.”
In the analogy, the solution is “the swap kid,” a participant who holds a little bit of every snack and allows everyone else to trade through him. Shah said this is the role XRP plays on the XRP Ledger. A trader may see a simple swap from a tokenized Treasury bill into a euro stablecoin, but the actual route could be tokenized Treasury bill to XRP to euro stablecoin.
“The XRP step is invisible to the trader,” Shah wrote. “They see ‘Treasury bill in, euro stablecoin out.’ But the XRP in the middle is what makes the trade possible, instantly, without anybody having to find a specific buyer on the other side.”
Shah framed RLUSD as “something entirely different.” It is a stablecoin, designed to be valued at $1 and backed by reserves held by its issuer. That makes it useful when one side of a trade wants a digital dollar. But it does not make RLUSD a universal routing asset across the ledger, he argued.
“RLUSD isn’t trying to be the swap kid,” Shah wrote. “It’s trying to be a juice box — a specific thing, with a known value, useful whenever both sides of a trade want a dollar.”
The distinction matters most in markets where there is no natural dollar leg. Shah cited examples such as tokenized Treasuries being swapped for tokenized euro money market funds, lending markets denominated in different assets, and other cross-asset activity that does not begin or end with dollars. In those cases, he said, the ledger needs a neutral bridge asset in the middle.
Three Reasons Why RLUSD Is Not An XRP Killer
Shah gave three reasons why he believes RLUSD cannot serve that function. The first is issuer risk. RLUSD exists because a company mints it and holds dollars in reserve. That is standard for stablecoins, but Shah argued it becomes a structural weakness if the stablecoin becomes the mandatory routing asset for all trades.
“If any stablecoin issuer ever ran into trouble — a regulatory issue, a banking issue, a court order to freeze accounts, a problem with their license — the stablecoin could have a problem too,” he wrote, adding that this was a general point about issued stablecoins rather than a claim about any specific issuer. “That’s fine if the stablecoin is one asset among many. It’s a serious design flaw if the stablecoin is the asset every trade routes through.”
The second issue is neutrality. Stablecoin issuers must comply with sanctions, court orders, blacklists and geographic restrictions. Shah said those controls are appropriate for a regulated stablecoin, but problematic if the same token is expected to route trades across a global permissionless ledger.
“The router has to work for everybody across jurisdictions and counterparties, without an intermediary who can decide who’s allowed to trade,” Shah wrote. “Under the current protocol design, no party can freeze XRP or prevent it from settling a trade. That neutrality is a structural requirement for the routing role.”
The third point is market structure. Liquidity pools and automated market makers require two different assets. There can be pools between RLUSD and euro stablecoins, or RLUSD and tokenized Treasuries. But Shah argued the broader question is which non-RLUSD asset becomes the common bridge across the ledger. In Evernorth’s view, that asset is XRP.
“In a world with hundreds of tokenized assets, every pair can’t have its own pool,” he wrote. “There isn’t enough capital or enough market-maker attention. A few assets end up doing most of the bridging work.”
Shah said XRP is positioned for that role because it is among the most liquid assets on the XRP Ledger across a wide range of other assets, because the protocol’s pathfinding routes through it by default, and because market makers concentrate capital on XRP pairs where volume exists. He also pointed to XRP’s lack of issuer, resistance to censorship under the current protocol design, and years of uninterrupted operation as relevant attributes for a bridge asset.
The post also extended the argument beyond trading. Shah said XRP can function as collateral in on-chain lending because it is liquid, broadly accepted and not subject to an issuer that can interfere with the asset during the life of a loan. He also highlighted escrow, where XRP can be locked for release at a future time or upon certain conditions, with the ledger enforcing the rules.
For Evernorth, the broader thesis is that on-chain finance will need both a digital dollar and a routing asset as more assets move on-chain. Shah was careful to frame that as a forward-looking view subject to uncertainty, but said the roles remain separate.
“We’re not making the case that RLUSD is unimportant,” he wrote. “The growth of on-chain finance requires a high-quality digital dollar, and RLUSD is designed to be one. We hold a view that the dollar leg and the routing leg are two different functions, and both grow with the size of the system.”
At press time, XRP traded at $1.37.
XRP bulls must break the 0.618 Fib, 1-week chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.