Home Blog Page 118

Crypto-Backed GOP Candidate Wins Alabama Senate Runoff with June Primaries Looming

0

More than $12 million in crypto-aligned political action committee (PAC) media buys helped propel Barry Moore to victory in Tuesday’s Alabama Republican US Senate runoff over Barry Moore.

The runoff was necessary after neither candidate was able to secure a majority of the vote on May 19, Moore will be the Republican candidate for a US Senate seat in Alabama, facing off against Democrat Everett Wess. Moore won with 55.8% of the vote to Hudson’s 44.2%, giving him an opportunity to replace outgoing Republican Senator Tommy Tuberville. 

Filings with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) showed that the Defend American Jobs PAC, a committee affiliated with the cryptocurrency company-backed Fairshake, spent more than $12 million on media and ads to back Moore’s candidacy in the May 19 primary and Tuesday’s runoff. The Coinbase-affiliated advocacy organization Stand With Crypto rated Moore as “strongly supports crypto,” based on public statements and his voting record while representing Alabama’s 1st Congressional district.

“Our biggest spend of the cycle yielded yet another pro-innovation champion in the Senate, and with nearly $150 million cash on hand we are ready to continue driving the construction of the largest pro-crypto caucus in history,” said Fairshake spokesperson Geoff Vetter.

Source: NBC News

Related: US lawmakers warn against presidential pardon for Sam Bankman-Fried

Based on Vetter’s statement, Fairshake and its affiliates may have spent more than $40 million across several US states in an attempt to support what it considers “pro-crypto” candidates for the next session of Congress. The PAC reported holding a $193 million war chest as of January.

More primaries set for next week before November general election

The Alabama runoff was the latest vote that’s seen industry PACs spending millions of dollars on media for candidates facing primaries in several US states, including South Carolina, Texas, California, South Dakota and New Jersey. Fairshake affiliate Protect Progress also reported spending about $5.2 million and $587,000 in media buys for House seats, respectively, for Maryland Democrat Adrian Boafo and fellow party member Ritchie Torres in New York, scheduled to hold primaries on June 23.

Magazine: The end of anon? AI could unmask crypto’s hidden identities

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

World Chain Bridge TVL Climbs 33% Over Seven Days as Worldcoin Token Posts Matching Rally

0

World Chain’s canonical-bridge TVL climbed 32.87% over seven days to about $602M, with WLD tracking the move at +33.6%. The growth concentrates in Re7 Labs vaults on Morpho Blue, while the chain’s on-chain DeFi TVL remains near $40M.

Total value locked in the canonical bridge of World Chain, the Optimism Stack rollup operated by Worldcoin’s Tools for Humanity, climbed 32.87% over seven days to about $602M, according to a DefiLlama snapshot earlier this morning. The token tracked the move, with WLD up over 50% in the same window.

The bridge holds assets locked on Ethereum that mirror across to the L2, and at $605 million, it’s the chain’s deepest pool of collateral. Re7 Labs, the risk curator running the most active lending vaults on the chain, now sits at $32.69M deployed on World Chain, about 35% of its $92M cross-chain book. Morpho Blue is the lending venue underneath those vaults. The growth puts World Chain among the fastest-moving names in the lower tier of the L2 ranking on a percent basis, even as Base, Arbitrum and Optimism still dwarf it in absolute scale.

Bridge Inflow

Two World Chain TVL figures circulate, and they describe different things. The bridge TVL counts Ethereum-side assets locked to enable use on the L2, currently around $605M. The on-chain DeFi TVL counts assets sitting inside protocols deployed on World Chain itself, which DefiLlama puts at roughly $39.7M today.

The 33% move belongs to the bridge. The on-chain figure is up sharply too on a percent basis, with chain TVL history showing a 2,567% climb from $1.5M in October 2024, but it remains a thin slice of the bridged base.

Bridge inflow shows that holders are committing capital to the L2 environment, while on-chain leverage and DEX volume are expanding more slowly. Most of the bridged stack sits idle from a DeFi-yield perspective. The active deployment is concentrated in Re7 Labs vaults and a handful of Morpho markets.

WLD Price

Worldcoin’s token is up 52% over the past seven days to about $0.67, with a $2.3B billion market cap and a $6.7 billion fully diluted valuation, per CoinGecko. The 30-day chart shows a 189% gain, a sharper recovery than the chain TVL alone would imply. WLD remains roughly 94% below its March 2024 peak of $11.74.

The token’s recovery sequence has tracked a series of operational milestones at Tools for Humanity rather than a single trigger. Arthur Hayes exited his WLD position on June 6, days after his Maelstrom fund had publicly pitched the asset as a liquid AI-IPO trade.

World App 3 and Orb 2

Tools for Humanity rolled out World App 3.0 at its Unwrapped event last December, pitching the wallet as a super-app that bundles encrypted messaging, mini-apps from Polymarket and Kalshi, and stablecoin support across USDC, EURC and several LatAm currency tokens. The verification base now sits near 7M humans across roughly 35 countries and 2,000 Orb locations, up from about 6M earlier this year.

The smaller Orb 2 hardware, unveiled by the company in April, is the operational lever Tools for Humanity is leaning on for US expansion. The company has flagged a 7,500-Orb target for the country and a manufacturing run of more than 50,000 devices per year. Partnerships with Tinder, Zoom and Docusign for human verification, announced earlier this spring, route consumer traffic into the World ID stack outside the wallet itself.

Regulatory pressure has not eased

The privacy disputes that defined Worldcoin’s launch period remain mostly unresolved. Kenya’s High Court declared Tools for Humanity’s operations illegal in May 2025 and ordered a seven-day biometric data purge under Justice Aburili. Brazil’s ANPD blanket ban issued in January 2025 has not been lifted; the regulator threatened fines of about $8,800 per day if operations resumed. Germany’s BayLDA delivered a GDPR deletion order in December 2024. Spain’s AEPD ban from March 2024 is still in force.

None of those jurisdictions show up in the verification footprint Tools for Humanity now markets. The company’s public posture has been to describe the disputes as resolvable through compliance redesigns. Regulators have largely not agreed in writing.

What sustains the inflow trend

The L2 sits at 43rd by chain TVL on DefiLlama, behind Algorand and ahead of Vaulta. The bridge ranking puts it well inside the top tier of canonical-bridge balances among OP Stack chains. Whether the seven-day move marks a durable shift or another cycle peak depends on whether the deployed on-chain TVL catches up to the bridged base, or whether the bridge balance retraces toward where on-chain activity currently sits.

The two interpretations split cleanly on the read. If bridged capital becomes deployed capital, World Chain joins the working L2 group on more than nominal terms. If bridged capital sits idle and the WLD rally fades, the move logs as a positioning event tied to the broader Worldcoin recovery narrative rather than a structural step.

Bitcoin Under Pressure Following Trump, Warsh Comments

0

Key takeaways:

  • Bitcoin remains under pressure from $2.1 billion in ETF outflows in June and an ongoing discount relative to global Bitcoin/USDT pairs.
  • Strategy’s STRC stock shows weakness, highlighting growing concerns over monthly dividend obligations and share dilution.

The US stock market traded down on Wednesday after President Donald Trump said the memorandum of understanding with Iran was not final. Investors fear that oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz will not clear quickly, which adds further pressure on inflation. Is the stock market and Bitcoin (BTC) at risk?

The US and Iran are expected to formally sign an agreement on Friday, starting a 60-day negotiation period. On Wednesday, Trump said the deal should please the markets and that oil prices might fall. However, the US President threatened further bombings if Iran did not “behave.”

US 5-year Treasury yield vs. crude Brent oil, USD. Source: TradingView

Crude Brent oil fell to its lowest level in 100 days, but traders doubt fuel prices will continue to weigh on markets for long. Yields on US Treasuries remained at 4.16%, flat from two weeks prior. Investors are less confident in the US Federal Reserve’s ability to cut interest rates soon, thereby demanding higher returns on government bonds.

Impact of higher inflation amid weak institutional Bitcoin demand

US retail sales data released on Wednesday showed 6.9% growth from May 2025, but the rise likely reflects higher costs of goods such as fuel. In parallel, Wednesday marked the first Fed Committee meeting by Chair Kevin Warsh. The decision to hold interest rates steady was largely expected, but investors will try to discern Warsh’s views and personal credibility.

Nasdaq-100 futures (left) vs. Bitcoin/USD (right). Source: TradingView

The tech-heavy Nasdaq-100 Index traded 2% below its all-time high, while Bitcoin has failed to hold above $80,000 since mid-May. Bitcoin traders’ skepticism partly stems from a lack of inflows into spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and the absence of a Coinbase premium relative to international exchanges, signaling weak demand from institutional investors.

Coinbase Bitcoin USD vs. international USDT prices. Source: TradingView & Cointelegraph

Coinbase Bitcoin price in USD has traded at a discount versus international exchanges based in USDT for the past five weeks. Meanwhile, the US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen $2.1 billion in net outflows so far in June. The recent weakness in the Strategy preferred perpetual equity Stretch (STRC US) has further fueled the negative sentiment.

Related: Bitcoin tops $67K following US-Iran peace deal: Is it a bull trap?

Strategy preferred perpetual equity Stretch (STRC US). Source: TradingView

STRC offers holders an 11.5% yield, but new stock issuance can only happen at the fixed $100 price. Consequently, Strategy has less room to pay $142 million in cash dividends each month, forcing dilution of MSTR holders by issuing more shares or reducing its USD cash reserves, which are currently at $1.1 billion. The total preferred shares issued by Strategy stand at $15.5 billion.

There is no evidence that Strategy will be forced to sell any of its Bitcoin reserves anytime soon, but weakness in the STRC price reflects low confidence in the company’s financial leverage. Even if Bitcoin institutional inflows resume, investors fear that the deal between the US and Iran might not go through, hence a sustainable rally to $80,000 could take longer.

Gaming Industry, Tribes and Unions Press Senate to Ban Sports Prediction Markets in Crypto Bill

0

The American Gaming Association, the Indian Gaming Association, and two hospitality unions are pressing senators to insert sports-betting carve-out language into the CLARITY Act, the crypto market-structure bill moving through Congress. The push targets Kalshi and Polymarket.

The American Gaming Association is leading a coalition of tribal groups and hospitality unions urging the Senate to insert language into pending crypto market-structure legislation that would bar prediction markets from offering sports wagers. The push squarely targets Kalshi and Polymarket.

The letter, dated June 16 and first reported by Semafor, was signed by the AGA, the Indian Gaming Association, the AFL-CIO’s Hotel and Gaming Trades Council and UNITE HERE. The signatories want lawmakers to use the CLARITY Act to reaffirm that “sports betting falls outside the CFTC’s remit and cannot be offered through prediction market platforms,” per the letter text.

The Coalition’s Argument

Prediction markets have “fueled the largest expansion of gambling in U.S. history over the past 18 months, without voter approval or legislative authorization,” the coalition wrote, per Semafor. The letter frames sports event contracts as a regulatory end-run around state and tribal gaming statutes.

The AGA estimates states have lost roughly $1 billion in tax revenue to prediction markets since the start of 2025, a figure it shared with CNBC last month. Prediction-market operators contest that estimate.

The coalition is asking senators to clarify in CLARITY that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s authority over event contracts excludes sports wagering, leaving that activity to state regulators and the framework that governs licensed sportsbooks and tribal casinos.

What CLARITY Currently Does

The CLARITY Act is the leading federal crypto market-structure bill, designed to assign jurisdiction over digital assets between the CFTC and the SEC. It does not directly address prediction markets, but the gaming coalition argues the bill is the most realistic legislative vehicle in the current Congress for adding a sports-betting carve-out.

The Senate Banking Committee advanced the legislation last month on a 15-9 vote, and a full Senate vote remains the next major step.

The Sponsors Already on Record

The most prominent sitting senator pressing the issue is Maria Cantwell of Washington, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Commerce Committee. At a May 20 subcommittee hearing, Cantwell drew a parallel between prediction-market growth and pre-2008 subprime lending, and pressed AGA chief executive Bill Miller on the impact to tribal casinos.

“Indian country is scared,” Miller responded at the hearing, citing the 680,000 jobs tribal gaming supported in 2025.

Senators Adam Schiff and John Curtis introduced the Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act in March, a standalone bill that would prohibit sports and casino-style event contracts on federally registered platforms. That bill has not advanced. Folding similar language into CLARITY, the coalition’s letter suggests, is now the faster path.

The Targets

Kalshi and Polymarket are the two operators most exposed. Kalshi raised $1 billion at a $22 billion valuation, The Defiant previously reported, and both platforms launched perpetual-futures contracts this spring under CFTC oversight. Sports contracts have been a major volume driver for both.

Institutional flow has followed. Galaxy Digital opened an OTC prediction-markets desk in May, executing a $10 million trade on CLARITY Act passage odds.

The Broader Jurisdictional War

The legislative push lands inside a multi-front fight over who regulates event contracts. The CFTC has sued New Mexico and sued Wisconsin to block state gambling regulators from reaching federally registered prediction markets, arguing that the Commodity Exchange Act gives the agency exclusive jurisdiction over registered event contracts.

States have pushed back. Washington state sued Kalshi in March, arguing the platform “attempts to skirt state law by branding its betting platform as a ‘prediction market.'” Enforcement actions or lawsuits have followed in Ohio, Nevada, New Jersey, Maryland, Montana, Illinois, New York, Connecticut, Arizona and Wisconsin.

A tribal coalition filed amicus briefs earlier this month at the Sixth Circuit arguing prediction markets undermine tribal gaming systems established under federal law. Former CFTC Chair Gary Gensler filed a separate brief arguing sports event contracts do not meet the Dodd-Frank Act’s definition of swaps because they are not used to hedge economic risk.

What’s at Stake for Operators

If a sports carve-out reaches CLARITY’s final text, Kalshi and Polymarket would lose a product line that has driven recent volume growth and pulled in institutional liquidity providers like Wintermute. If it does not, the CFTC framework remains the federal anchor and the state-by-state litigation continues.

The Senate has yet to schedule a floor vote on CLARITY. Industry advocates and the prediction-market coalition will likely have their respective amendments ready when it does.

Litecoin Spot ETF Sits at $9M as Altcoin-ETF Era Tests Its Demand Thesis

0

The first US spot Litecoin ETF has been trading for nearly eight months, but Canary Capital’s LTCC has drawn under $10 million as LTC sits 89% below its all-time high, testing the thesis that altcoin ETF approval automatically translates into institutional inflows.

The first US spot Litecoin ETF has been trading for nearly eight months, and the price of the underlying asset has barely moved. Litecoin sits near $45, down roughly 89% from its $400-plus peak, even as Canary Capital’s LTCC fund and a parallel SEC/CFTC commodity classification cleared the last regulatory hurdles altcoin holders had been waiting on.

Canary Capital launched LTCC on Nasdaq on October 28, 2025, the first US-listed spot ETF for a digital asset outside Bitcoin and Ethereum. The Nashville-based issuer marketed the fund as “simplified exposure to Litecoin,” with CEO Steven McClurg calling Litecoin “one of the longest-running blockchains” with “enterprise-class use cases.” The fund tracks the CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index and holds spot LTC at a regulated custodian, with Paralel Distributors acting as marketing agent.

Eight Months In

TradingView data on NASDAQ:LTCC puts trailing-year fund flows at roughly $9.3 million, an order of magnitude below what comparable spot Bitcoin and Ether products absorbed in their first quarter. Litecoin ETFs logged their first net inflow in a month on May 22, around $260,000, per crypto.news data. That is small-block demand, not the institutional re-rating issuers had pitched.

Litecoin itself trades at $45.35 on CoinGecko at the time of writing, with a $3.5 billion market cap. The asset is down 0.5% over the past day, and is down roughly 89% from its all-time high. The ETF launched into LTC’s existing drawdown, and the wrapper has not reversed it.

Clearing the SEC

On March 17, 2026, the SEC and CFTC issued a joint interpretation clarifying that 16 digital assets, Litecoin included, qualify as digital commodities rather than securities under federal law. That classification placed LTC under CFTC jurisdiction and removed the unregistered-securities question that has clouded most altcoins since 2017.

LTCC itself reached market before the joint guidance, via a Canary S-1 amendment process running through 2025. Canary subsequently extended the playbook, launching a spot Solana ETF (SOLC) and a spot XRP ETF (XRPC) on Nasdaq, alongside Hedera (HBR) and Sui (SUIS) products. The five-asset suite gives the same issuer parallel exposure to how demand distributes across the altcoin ETF wave.

A toehold in institutional plumbing

A Litecoin-community account surfaced a Schwab SEC disclosure on June 6 indicating the Charles Schwab Family of Funds is using LTCC as a collateral investment inside a Schwab money-market sleeve. The original filing has not been independently republished by Schwab in a primary venue, and the size of the allocation has not been broken out. The reference, if accurate, would place LTCC inside tier-one money-market plumbing of a kind spot Bitcoin ETFs took years to penetrate.

Canary itself used the eight-month mark to remind the market the product exists. The issuer posted on June 15, 2026 that “LTCC brings one of crypto’s most battle-tested networks to a U.S. exchange,” linking the LTCC prospectus and tagging the Litecoin Foundation. The post arrived against a backdrop of LTC trading sideways at $44 to $45.

What’s queued behind LTCC

The altcoin ETF pipeline behind Litecoin runs deeper than the price chart suggests. Spot XRP funds are now live on multiple US venues, led by Canary’s XRPC and Bitwise’s organized-October-2025 XRP fund. Bitwise filed an 8(a) form to launch a spot Dogecoin ETF, with the 20-day automatic effectiveness window potentially clearing it before any SEC intervention. VanEck and Grayscale pushed forward with spot BNB ETF amendments last month. Avalanche, Cardano, Hedera, and Polkadot products sit further back in issuer pipelines.

The SEC’s posture under the current chair has been to allow the products through case-by-case effectiveness rather than block them, with the joint commodity guidance functioning as a structural backstop. That posture is a sharp departure from the litigation-heavy approach of the prior administration, and it has translated into roughly a dozen non-BTC, non-ETH spot ETFs reaching US markets in less than a year.

Demand Question

The Litecoin ETF was the first real-world test of a thesis that has driven much of the altcoin-ETF enthusiasm: that regulatory access alone unlocks institutional flows. Eight months of trading data suggest the relationship runs the other way. LTCC’s AUM reflects modest pre-existing demand for spot Litecoin exposure, not a failure of the wrapper itself. The same access mechanism that unlocked $40 billion of cumulative inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs has produced under $10 million for Litecoin.

That sets the bar for products further back in the queue. XRP’s reported first-day reception on Canary’s XRPC, plus follow-on issuer launches from Bitwise and Grayscale, suggests latent demand existed there. Solana ETF flows have been steadier than Litecoin’s, with the asset’s broader ecosystem and developer base supplying a narrative the wrapper can amplify. The same dynamic surfaced earlier when spot Hyperliquid ETFs crossed $69 million in net inflows within weeks of listing. Dogecoin and BNB will face their own version of the LTCC test once they trade.

Canary has not published a quarterly AUM update beyond its 10-Q filing for the period ending March 31, 2026, and the next snapshot is due after Q2 closes. Schwab has not directly confirmed the LTCC collateral disclosure that surfaced last week, and the dollar size of any allocation is undisclosed.

Here is how Coinbase plan to survive the crypto winter by ditching its reliance on trading fees

0

Coinbase’s (COIN) latest product launch event may not have changed Wall Street’s near-term earnings forecasts, but it reinforced a growing belief among analysts that the crypto exchange is steadily transforming itself into a broader financial platform with revenue streams that extend beyond bitcoin’s price cycles.

At Tuesday’s System Update event in New York, Coinbase unveiled products spanning derivatives, tokenized stocks, stablecoin payments, lending and artificial intelligence. While the announcements covered a wide range of businesses, analysts focused less on the individual products and more on what they reveal about the company’s long-term strategy.

For years, Coinbase’s fortunes have been closely tied to crypto trading activity. When bitcoin rallies and retail investors return to the market, trading revenue tends to surge. During slower periods, that revenue can fall sharply. Analysts increasingly view Coinbase’s product expansion as an effort to reduce that dependence.

“The new features are aligned with the company’s effort to become the ‘everything’ exchange,” Barclays analyst Benjamin Budish wrote following the event, adding that the company is seeking to capture a larger share of customers’ financial activity as crypto trading volumes remain relatively subdued.

Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Ramsey El-Assal struck a similar tone. While acknowledging softer conditions across crypto markets, he said Coinbase’s “innovation engine hasn’t skipped a beat” and argued that the company is positioning itself to benefit from a future where consumers manage investing, spending and borrowing through a single app or wallet.

‘The prize’

What stood out to analysts among Coinbase’s myriad new product launches was derivatives.

Organizations Urge Congress to Ban Sports Betting on Prediction Markets in CLARITY Act

0

Several national gaming and tribal organizations and labor groups have reportedly called on the US Senate to add language “that explicitly prohibits event contracts tied to sports and casino-style gaming” in the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act.

According to a Wednesday Semafor report, groups tied to sports betting, including the Indian Gaming Association and American Gaming Association have united against what they called gambling on prediction markets. They requested that the US Congress use the CLARITY Act now under consideration in the Senate to affirm that “sports betting falls outside the [Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s] remit and cannot be offered through prediction market platforms.”

“While our organizations may differ on other issues, including gambling policy, we are united in our concern that prediction markets have fueled the largest expansion of gambling in US history over the past 18 months — without voter approval or legislative authorization,” said the letter.

Source: Semafor

The pushback from the groups comes as the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) under Chair Michael Selig has claimed “exclusive jurisdiction” over prediction markets. Selig has led the financial regulator in supporting platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket against lawsuits by state-level gaming authorities.

“The CFTC was created to oversee commodities and derivatives markets, not gambling and not sports wagering,” said the letter. “It lacks both the expertise and the infrastructure to police nationwide sports betting, particularly when robust state and tribal regulatory systems already exist.”

The American Gaming Association reported that as of Wednesday, state gaming authorities had lost about $1.08 billion in tax dollars “since prediction markets began offering sports event contracts.”

Related: Kalshi adds software partner as it looks to boost prediction market surveillance

Some lawmakers expect the CLARITY Act, aimed at transferring some of the authority in regulation and enforcement of digital assets from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to the CFTC, to be passed out of Congress by August. The bill passed the House of Representatives in July 2025, but has faced delays due to concerns over stablecoin yield, ethics and tokenized equities.

Legal fight could land in US Supreme Court

Some experts and industry advocates anticipate that with Selig and the CFTC threatening to take any state-level authorities to court over crackdowns on prediction markets, the dispute between federal and state regulators could eventually be heard by the US Supreme Court.

The country’s highest court gave individual states the authority to regulate sports gambling in its 2018 decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association. However, Kalshi, Polymarket and the CFTC have largely argued that event contracts on prediction market platforms are “swaps” only subject to the agency’s jurisdiction.

Magazine: The end of anon? AI could unmask crypto’s hidden identities

Kentucky targets prediction markets, puts red state in potential clash with Trump team

0

“This action runs counter to the CFTC’s established framework for regulating prediction markets,” the spokesperson said in a statement emailed to CoinDesk.

So far, the states that have filed such a challenge against the prediction markets have met with counter suits from the CFTC, where Chairman Mike Selig has taken an aggressive legal stance defending his agency’s authority as the sole regulatory power over events contracts, which he says falls directly into the CFTC’s authority over U.S. derivatives.

And Trump has recently backed him up.

“It is critically important that the CFTC’s exclusive authority over Prediction Markets is maintained, and that they will thrive,” Trump posted on his social media site, Truth Social. “Under my leadership, we are setting ‘rules of the road’ that are the Gold Standard for the States.”

He asserted that his state-level political foes (offering names including Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker) are “SCUM” who shouldn’t be allowed to set the rules.

“It is a major Industry, and we must protect it,” Trump wrote. “Mike Selig, CFTC Chairman, and respected by all, is doing a great job.”

The CFTC has sued eight states — most recently New Mexico — and leapt into other court matters involving the sector.

Zama, Morpho and Steakhouse Open First Confidential USDC Yield Vault on Ethereum

0

Zama, Morpho and Steakhouse open the first DeFi yield vault for Confidential USDC on June 23, routing encrypted cUSDC into Steakhouse Prime v2 on Morpho and putting fully homomorphic encryption to work in live lending.

Privacy-tech firm Zama said Wednesday it is launching the first DeFi yield product for Confidential USDC, opening deposits June 23 through a vault built on Morpho and curated by Steakhouse Financial. The product extends fully homomorphic encryption from simple token transfers into a productive lending strategy, the first time the cryptography has been bolted to a live DeFi yield venue.

The Steakhouse Confidential USDC Prime vault accepts cUSDC, Zama’s encrypted wrapper of Circle’s stablecoin, and routes the underlying capital into Steakhouse’s existing Prime v2 strategy on Morpho. Backing collateral spans cbBTC, WBTC and wstETH, the same blue-chip basket used in the flagship USDC Prime vault. Zama posted the launch on its official X account, with a six-day shielding window opening for depositors first.

How the encryption layer works

Fully homomorphic encryption lets a smart contract perform arithmetic on ciphertext without decrypting it, the primitive Zama has productized. Balances, deposit amounts and transfer values stay encrypted on Ethereum, while the vault’s accounting math, including yield accrual and share issuance, runs on the encrypted state. Health checks and risk parameters operate on the same primitives, so the curator can read solvency without reading positions.

Depositors first convert standard USDC into cUSDC inside the Zama application, then deposit the wrapped token into the Confidential Prime vault. The Morpho strategy underneath is unchanged from the public Prime v2 path. What changes is that wallet balances, transaction timing and deposit sizes no longer appear in plaintext on the chain, while aggregate vault statistics stay visible because they are necessary for solvency monitoring.

Why Morpho

Zama has run cUSDC on Ethereum since earlier this year as a privacy wrapper for holding and transferring USDC. Until Wednesday’s announcement, the encrypted balance could not generate yield without giving up the privacy that justified the wrapper in the first place. Routing into Morpho’s vault infrastructure closes that gap by importing an existing lending venue rather than spinning up a fresh protocol.

Morpho co-founder Merlin Egalite framed institutional confidentiality as the loudest source of demand the team has heard, according to the Zama announcement. The pitch is that allocators can route capital into the same Morpho vaults they already underwrite, without leaking position sizes or entry timing to competitors who would otherwise read every wallet move on the chain.

Steakhouse co-founder Sébastien Derivaux made the auditability case alongside, in remarks that accompanied the launch: confidential deposits remove depositor-level visibility while preserving the curator- and protocol-side telemetry that risk and compliance teams need. The framing is privacy at the wallet layer with full transparency at the vault layer, the split Steakhouse is positioning toward regulated allocators evaluating onchain credit.

Steakhouse as Curator

Steakhouse Financial sits in the curator seat the same way it does on its public Prime v2 vault, setting collateral parameters, allocations and risk caps. The firm extended its lead over the next-largest Morpho curator to roughly $1 billion last month. The confidential vault now plugs into that same credit infrastructure, inheriting the curator’s existing market-by-market allocation logic rather than spinning up a parallel risk model.

The Confidential Prime vault inherits Steakhouse’s existing supply allocations across Morpho markets rather than reopening parameters. That choice keeps the risk surface familiar to anyone already underwriting the standard Prime vault, while the privacy layer rides on top. Allocations across cbBTC, WBTC and wstETH markets carry over from the public sibling, so depositors take on the same credit exposure they would in the transparent version.

Institutional Pitch

Treasury desks and prop traders have repeatedly pointed to public wallet visibility as a barrier to deploying meaningful size onchain. A large depositor in a transparent vault telegraphs strategy, exposes the firm to front-running on related markets, and lets competitors map allocation patterns over time as positions enter and exit the contract.

Confidential USDC yield is the first product where that visibility is removed at the deposit and balance layer itself, with the encryption baked into the asset rather than added by an intermediary like a privacy-pool mixer or a CEX bridge. Earlier privacy tooling required depositors to trust either a mixer’s anonymity set or a centralized custodian to obscure activity.

Morpho already attracts treasury rails from Coinbase, which launched two USDC lending vaults on the protocol earlier this month with Steakhouse as curator. The Confidential Prime vault stacks the same Morpho lending primitive with Zama’s FHE layer on top, repurposing the existing venue rather than asking institutional desks to learn a brand-new protocol.

Ahead of the launch, Zama is running a shielding campaign through June 22 that converts USDC into cUSDC, with a $25,000 prize draw distributed across 25 winners. The campaign is the protocol’s main mechanism for routing supply into the wrapper before deposits open, and the resulting cUSDC pool sets the addressable base for the vault on day one.

Blacklist

The vault opens roughly three weeks after a US federal court lifted a temporary restraining order that had pushed Circle to blacklist Zama’s cUSDC contract, freezing roughly $12.5 million in USDC for three days. The freeze was triggered by an unrelated civil dispute involving a single depositor whose position represented more than 99% of the early contract balance.

The restored contract is the same wrapper now feeding the Morpho vault. Zama said the resolution validated its position that the freeze was unwarranted, and the company has continued building the yield product on the unmodified cUSDC architecture. Whether the legal episode has hardened institutional comfort with the wrapper or made it harder to recruit anchor depositors is the open question hanging over the June 23 open.

Where Is The Capital Going?

0

Altcoin markets (excluding Ether (ETH)) recently saw $266 billion in net selling volume on centralized exchanges, the deepest reading since the metric began tracking spot demand in 2020.

Altcoins accounted for 51% of Binance futures trading volume on June 16, compared with 28.85% for Bitcoin and 20.20% for Ether, positioning the exchange as a leader in derivatives activity in 2026.

The divergence between record selling and dominant trading activity points to capital rotating within crypto and also into alternative exchange products.

Altcoin trading stays active despite outflows

Crypto analyst IT Tech noted that the one-year cumulative buy-sell difference for altcoins, excluding Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), dropped to -$266 billion on June 16.

One-year cumulative buy-sell volume for altcoins. Source: CryptoQuant 

The current readings show that selling pressure has outweighed buying demand for an extended period, pushing the cumulative balance to a new low.

However, altcoin trading activity tells a different story. Data shows altcoins accounted for 51% of daily futures trading volume on June 16, compared with 28.85% for Bitcoin and 20.20% for Ether. Altcoins have led exchange trading volumes for most of 2025, aside from a brief period in February when Bitcoin overtook the sector.

Volume dominance between BTC, ETH, and altcoins. Source: CryptoQuant

The combination of elevated futures trading activity and deeply negative spot demand points to capital recycling within the altcoin market rather than fresh spot inflows. This shows investors continuing to trade altcoins, although aggregate spot purchases have not kept pace with the selling volume.

Related: BitGo courts crypto firms awaiting MiCA approval amid Binance licensing concerns

Crypto liquidity shifts beyond altcoins

Market analyst MorenoDV indicated that exchange stablecoin balances have changed little since December 2024. The exchange supply ratio for ERC-20 stablecoins has fluctuated between 0.40 and 0.46, meaning roughly 40% to 46% of circulating stablecoins have stayed on exchanges for more than a year.

Stablecoins (ERC20) exchange supply ratios. Source: CryptoQuant

During the same period, Bitcoin experienced price swings exceeding 50%, trading between $60,000 and $120,000. Binance held between 25% and 30% of the total stablecoin supply, accounting for more than half of exchange-held reserves. This indicates liquidity has stayed available, but capital deployment has become increasingly selective.

Part of the capital appears to be targeting traditional asset products offered by crypto exchanges. According to CryptoQuant, metals futures volume peaked at nearly $500 billion in March 2026, as gold and silver prices reached record highs. The trading activity in pre-IPO perpetual products expanded to $715 million in May and $2 billion in June, up from just $2 million in March.

Binance processed $10.3 billion in pre-IPO perpetual volume in June, roughly 20 times higher than the entire month of May, while controlling about 83% of the segment. Growth in metals, oil, equities, and pre-IPO contracts highlights how exchange users are increasingly allocating liquidity across a wider range of assets, with Binance continuing to hold the largest concentration of deployable stablecoin capital.

Related: Hyperliquid open interest surges 32% in week: Is $80 HYPE next?