The departures also come as the foundation has unveiled a new strategic framework known as “CROPS,” an acronym standing for cypherpunk values, resilience, open-source development, permissionlessness and security. Foundation leaders presented the framework as a way to clarify the EF’s mission and reinforce Ethereum’s core values as the ecosystem becomes increasingly decentralized. Supporters viewed it as a reaffirmation of Ethereum’s founding principles, while critics argued it did little to address concerns about execution, organizational effectiveness and the network’s competitive position.
Among the most vocal critics was former Ethereum researcher Dankrad Feist, who suggested the recent spate of executive departures reflected deeper management issues rather than disagreements over strategy.
“The people who are leaving the Ethereum Foundation are CROPS believers,” Feist wrote on X. “The problem isn’t with the strategy, it’s with management.”
Feist’s comments were notable because they challenged the prevailing idea that recent departures stemmed from dissatisfaction with the foundation’s new direction. Instead, he argued that many of those leaving supported the CROPS vision itself, making the loss of talent a reflection of leadership shortcomings rather than ideological disagreements. “The exodus of talent is truly bearish for Ethereum, sadly,” he added.
Other community members echoed concerns about the Foundation’s internal dynamics. “It makes me sad to see the dysfunction at the Ethereum Foundation,” head of engineering at Coinbase Yuga Cohler wrote on X.