Home Blog Page 698

Step-by-Step: How to Estimate Your Settlement with an Alberta Severance Pay Calculator

0

Losing a job is one of the most stressful experiences a person can face. Beyond the emotional toll, there is an immediate practical question that demands an answer: how much money are you actually entitled to? In Alberta, the answer is rarely simple. Severance pay is governed by a combination of provincial employment standards, common law principles, and the specific terms of your employment contract. Before you sign anything or accept an offer from your former employer, it is worth taking the time to understand exactly what your entitlements are and how to arrive at a credible estimate.

Understanding What “Severance” Actually Means in Alberta

The word “severance” is often used loosely, but in Alberta’s legal context it covers several distinct categories of compensation. The first is termination pay under the Employment Standards Code, which sets out minimum notice periods based on your length of service. For example, employees with one to two years of service are entitled to two weeks of notice or pay in lieu, while those with ten or more years are entitled to eight weeks. These are legal minimums — not the full picture.

The second and often far more significant category is common law reasonable notice. Under Alberta common law, courts can award far more than the statutory minimums, depending on factors such as your age, position, years of service, and the availability of comparable employment. A senior manager with fifteen years of tenure at a specialized firm may be entitled to twelve to twenty-four months of reasonable notice — well beyond what the Employment Standards Code requires.

Additionally, you may be entitled to a portion of bonuses, benefits continuation, stock options, pension contributions, and other compensation that would have accrued during the notice period. Missing any one of these components can mean leaving significant money on the table.

Step 1: Gather Your Employment Information

Before you can estimate anything, you need to compile the key facts about your employment. Start with the following:

Your start date and end date. Length of service is one of the most heavily weighted factors in any severance calculation. Be precise, as even a few months can shift your entitlement by a meaningful amount.

Your base salary and total compensation. Severance calculations in Alberta are generally based on total compensation, not just base pay. This includes regular bonuses, commissions, car allowances, and other regular benefits with a monetary value. Gather your most recent pay stubs and your last T4 slip to establish an accurate compensation figure.

Your job title and responsibilities. Courts distinguish between entry-level employees and those in managerial or executive roles. The more senior your position, the longer the expected reasonable notice period tends to be.

Your employment contract. Review the document carefully for any termination or severance clause. If a valid clause exists that limits your entitlement to the Employment Standards Code minimums, it will significantly affect your calculation. However, many such clauses are poorly drafted and unenforceable — an important nuance that is easy to miss without professional guidance.

Step 2: Calculate Your Statutory Minimums Under the Employment Standards Code

Begin with the legal floor. Under Alberta’s Employment Standards Code, your minimum termination notice or pay in lieu is calculated as follows:

  • Less than 90 days of service: no entitlement
  • 90 days to 2 years: 1 week
  • 2 to 4 years: 2 weeks
  • 4 to 6 years: 4 weeks
  • 6 to 8 years: 5 weeks
  • 8 to 10 years: 6 weeks
  • 10 or more years: 8 weeks

To translate this into a dollar amount, divide your annual salary by 52 and multiply by the applicable number of weeks. This gives you a base number — but again, this is only the minimum.

Step 3: Estimate Your Common Law Entitlement

This is where an Alberta severance pay calculator becomes a genuinely valuable tool. Common law reasonable notice goes well beyond statutory minimums and is calculated by applying what is known as the Bardal factors — a legal framework drawn from a foundational Canadian employment law case. The key factors are your age, the character of your employment (i.e., seniority and specialization), your length of service, and the availability of similar work.

A well-designed online calculator allows you to input your age, job level, years of service, and salary to generate an estimated reasonable notice range. While no tool can replace the judgment of an employment lawyer, a quality calculator provides a useful ballpark figure that helps you evaluate whether your employer’s offer is fair or woefully inadequate.

For instance, a 52-year-old manager earning $120,000 per year with 12 years of service might have a common law entitlement in the range of 14 to 20 months — potentially worth $140,000 to $200,000 in total compensation. Compare that to the statutory minimum of 8 weeks, and you begin to see how significant the gap can be.

Step 4: Account for Additional Entitlements

A complete severance estimate must go beyond base salary and notice weeks. Make sure you account for the following:

Bonus and incentive pay. If you regularly received a bonus, you are typically entitled to a prorated portion of what you would have earned during the notice period. Courts in Alberta have consistently upheld this principle, even when employment contracts attempt to exclude bonuses upon termination.

Benefits continuation. Health, dental, and other benefit coverage should continue throughout the notice period. If your employer terminated your benefits immediately, this is a compensable loss that should be factored into your estimate.

Pension and RRSP matching. Any employer contributions that would have been made during the reasonable notice period are also recoverable.

Stock options and long-term incentives. If your compensation included stock options or other long-term incentive plans, their value during the notice period is potentially recoverable depending on the plan terms and applicable case law.

Step 5: Compare the Offer Against Your Estimate

Once you have a reasonable estimate of your full entitlement, compare it to what your employer is offering. Employers frequently offer the statutory minimum or a modest premium above it, betting that employees are unaware of their broader rights. If the gap between the offer and your estimate is substantial — and it often is — you have grounds to negotiate.

Do not sign a release agreement without first understanding what you are giving up. A severance release is a legally binding document that, once signed, extinguishes your right to pursue any further claims. If the offer is well below your entitlement, it may be worth consulting an employment lawyer before proceeding.

Why Getting the Numbers Right Matters

The difference between accepting an inadequate severance package and negotiating a fair one can be tens of thousands of dollars. For someone mid-career with a family and a mortgage, that difference is not trivial — it is the difference between a comfortable transition and a financial crisis. Armed with a credible estimate, you are in a much stronger negotiating position, and your employer knows it.

The process of estimating your severance does not have to be overwhelming. By working through the steps outlined above — gathering your employment information, calculating statutory entitlements, applying common law principles, and accounting for all components of compensation — you can arrive at a well-informed figure that reflects what you are genuinely owed. In a situation where you may already feel powerless, that knowledge is a significant source of leverage.







Banks Warned of Deposit Flight. OKX Survey Shows Stablecoin Yield Is Already Here

0

  • OKX surveyed 1,000 active U.S. crypto traders and found over 65% have used onchain tools to earn yield on stablecoins.
  • Over 25% of respondents said they use stablecoin-yield strategies regularly.

A majority of active U.S. crypto traders are already using blockchain-based tools to earn yield on stablecoins, according to a new survey from crypto exchange OKX, complicating one of the banking industry’s central arguments in Washington’s ongoing fight over digital-asset regulation.

The survey of 1,000 active U.S. crypto traders found that more than 65% had used onchain tools to generate yield on stablecoins, while more than one in four said they do so regularly. The findings suggest that the behavior banks have warned could trigger a destabilizing outflow of deposits from the traditional financial system is, at least among active crypto users, already entrenched rather than hypothetical.

That matters because stablecoin rewards remain one of the most contested issues in U.S. crypto policymaking. The GENIUS Act, enacted in July 2025, established a federal framework for payment stablecoins and bars permitted issuers from paying interest or yield to holders solely for holding, using or retaining those tokens. But banks and trade groups have argued that the law left room for intermediaries such as crypto exchanges to continue offering stablecoin-linked rewards, creating what they describe as a loophole that could intensify competition for deposits.

That debate has only sharpened in recent months. Earlier this year, White House officials were pulled into the dispute after banks pressed lawmakers to tighten the rules, warning that exchange-based yield programs could lure funds away from insured deposits.

In March, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency proposed implementation rules that would broaden scrutiny of arrangements involving “related third parties” offering interest or yield to payment stablecoin holders, a sign regulators are now examining ways to prevent issuers from indirectly doing what the statute bars them from doing directly.

Against that backdrop, OKX’s survey presents a market already operating ahead of the policy debate. Among the respondents, stablecoin yield use appears to have moved well beyond experimentation. Providing liquidity to stablecoin pools was the most popular strategy, attracting nearly 40% of respondents, followed by staking on centralized platforms at just over 36%. Nearly one in five said they used DeFi lending protocols.

The data points to a user base that is neither new nor casual. Nearly two-thirds of respondents began actively trading before 2023, according to OKX, meaning most of the sample had already traded through multiple market cycles, including the 2022 collapse in crypto prices and the market recovery that followed. For that group, stablecoin yield appears to be less a speculative side bet than an established part of how they manage idle capital in the crypto ecosystem.

Even so, the survey suggests that adoption has not resolved crypto’s long-running usability problem. 29% of respondents said security risks and scams were the single biggest barrier keeping them from going further onchain. Another 25% pointed to the fear of making irreversible mistakes, while 23% cited the difficulty of managing multiple applications.

These findings show a contradiction that has become more visible as crypto matures: users want ownership and control, but many still find the onchain experience too fragmented or risky to navigate with confidence. In the OKX survey, 51% said they preferred to manage most aspects of trading themselves while using some automation, and 38% said they wanted full responsibility. Only 2% said they would be comfortable handing over complete control.

That does not mean traders are rejecting intermediation altogether. Rather, the survey suggests they are open to delegating specific operational functions while keeping strategic decisions for themselves. Best-price routing was the task respondents were most comfortable handing to an exchange, selected by 24% of respondents. Scam detection followed at 21%, then execution-timing optimization at 16% and bridging at 12%. Just 1% said they would prefer to delegate nothing.

The pattern reflects a more nuanced version of crypto’s self-custody ethos. Traders still want agency over capital allocation and market direction, but they appear increasingly willing to let platforms handle the error-prone and security-sensitive plumbing underneath. That division of labor is likely to favor exchanges and other crypto platforms trying to position themselves as simplified gateways into decentralized markets rather than as pure centralized venues.

OKX’s survey supports that view. More than one-third of respondents said they expected centralized exchanges to be their primary gateway to onchain markets, while only 16% said they would mainly access those markets directly through DeFi platforms. When asked about a model that combines centralized exchange infrastructure with onchain execution, 90% of respondents expressed positive interest.

That preference lands at a moment when regulators are still working through how much responsibility centralized platforms should bear in crypto’s next phase. The OCC’s proposed GENIUS Act rules, published this month, would not only restate the act’s yield prohibition for issuers but also create a presumption against structures that use affiliates or third parties to pass rewards through to stablecoin holders. Legal analyses of the proposal say the agency is trying to prevent evasion of the statute while clarifying custody, reserve and operational requirements before the law fully takes effect.

Banks, meanwhile, continue to frame the issue as one of systemic competition. According to Standard Chartered estimate, U.S. banks could lose as much as $500 billion in deposits to stablecoins by 2028, with smaller lenders potentially hit hardest.

Banking groups have used those concerns to argue that Congress should close the rewards loophole, while crypto firms counter that restricting intermediaries would freeze out a use case that traders are already demanding.

The OKX survey does not settle that broader argument. It does, however, show that for active U.S. crypto traders, stablecoin yield is already part of routine market behavior. The bigger constraint may not be demand, but the mechanics of how safely and simply users can access those returns.

For exchanges, that creates both an opportunity and a policy risk. The opportunity is clear: traders appear willing to use centralized platforms as trusted entry points into onchain finance, especially for functions tied to execution, security and fraud prevention. The risk is that Washington may yet decide those same platforms have become too effective at delivering bank-like rewards through crypto rails.

As lawmakers and regulators wrestle with that question, the market may already be giving its answer.

The article “Banks Warned of Deposit Flight. OKX Survey Shows Stablecoin Yield Is Already Here” was first published on AlexaBlockchain. Read the complete article here: https://alexablockchain.com/OKX-Survey-Shows-Stablecoin-Yield-Is-Already-Here/

Read Also: MoneyGram, Pairpoint and eToro Back Midnight’s Privacy Blockchain Before Mainnet

Disclaimer: The information provided on AlexaBlockchain is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read complete disclaimer here.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Canva, Wiki Commons

XRP Holders More Educated Than Bitcoiners? Bank Of International Settlements Report Shares Revelation

0

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Crypto pundit Cool Breeze has drawn attention to a Bank of International Settlements (BIS) report that praised XRP holders as being more educated than Bitcoiners. The report also highlighted these XRP holders as being wealthier than the average crypto holders. 

XRP Holders Said To Be More Educated Than Bitcoiners

In an X post, Cool Breeze highlighted the BIS report, which claimed that XRP holders were more educated than Bitcoiners. Specifically, the report ranked XRP and Ethereum as the most educated among crypto holders. In contrast, LTC holders were said to be the least educated, with Bitcoin owners ranking in the middle. 

Furthermore, the report noted that crypto holders have higher-than-average household incomes, with Ethereum, Stellar, and XRP holders said to be the wealthiest. It is worth noting that this report was released in 2021, and so, the research findings may be different this time around. The report suggested that long-term crypto ownership played a key role in reaching some of these findings. 

XRP
Source: Chart from Cool Breeze on X

The BIS report estimated that owning a crypto in one year increases the probability, on average, of owning a crypto in the following year by 50%. Notably, XRP holders, famously known as the ‘XRP Army,’ have gained a reputation for their long-term belief in the altcoin. These crypto holders held their tokens even during the SEC’s multi-year lawsuit against Ripple, which negatively impacted the XRP price.  

Pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton had notably praised these XRP holders for playing a key role in Ripple’s case against the SEC. These holders, alongside Deaton, had filed an amicus brief in which they provided the court with information in favour of Ripple explaining why XRP wasn’t a security, as the SEC alleged. The court eventually ruled that XRP wasn’t a security. 

XRP Holders Are On The Rise

On-chain analytics platform Santiment revealed that XRP holders are on the rise, with the XRP Ledger (XRPL) now having more than 7.7 million holders for the first time since its launch. This comes as the network’s usage continues to grow, especially with more real-world assets being tokenized.  

The XRP Ledger also reached a 5-week high of 46,767 active addresses earlier this week, as the XRP price spiked 14% and climbed above $1.60. Interestingly, this feat for the XRPL comes just as Chainlink community member Zach Rynes (Chainlink God) described the network as a ‘ghost chain.’ 

Commenting on this, Cool Breeze urged XRP holders not to fall for the ‘hate campaign’ by Link God, claiming that they simply wanted to shake them out. The pundit further highlighted how XRP has performed better against Bitcoin than Chainlink has against the leading crypto. 

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $.152, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP
XRP trading at $1.52 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Featured image from Freepik, chart from Tradingview.com

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Crypto Ties a Liability in Illinois Primary

0

Not all voters are sold on crypto, and in Illinois, the crypto industry lobby failed to secure a victory, despite spending millions. 

On Tuesday, Illinois Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton won a primary election for a rare open US Senate seat in her state. She is expected to win in the general election and take the seat of retiring Democratic Senator Dick Durbin.

In the primary, she won over two other candidates, Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi, who currently represents Illinois’ 8th Congressional district, and Representative Robin Kelly from Illinois’ 2nd.     

The crypto lobby spent millions on ads supporting Krishnamoorthi. But ties to the industry may have been more of a liability among progressive voters. 

“MAGA-backed crypto bros” finance Krishnamoorthi 

In the months leading up to the election, Stratton ran on a progressive platform to oppose US President Donald Trump, and according to the Chicago Sun Times, was the only candidate to openly oppose Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). She also supported a higher minimum wage than Krishnamoorthi or Kelly.

As the primary race got closer, political action committees (PACs), notably Fairshake and Protect Progress, began to pour millions of dollars into the election. 

Their motivations were clear. Ensuring that the industry has another crypto-friendly senator could be crucial as the Senate continues to work on the CLARITY Act. 

Krishamoorthi was a strong supporter of the GENIUS Act, which provided favorable regulations for stablecoins. He also voted for the CLARITY Act and the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act. This earned him an “A” rating with Stand With Crypto, a cryptocurrency advocacy organization tracking legislative records and attitudes. 

Stratton’s campaign drew particular attention to the crypto dollars in the final weeks of the election. The Chicago Sun Times estimated that Fairshake spent over $8 million.

In a March 3 video posted to X, Stratton said that Krishnamoorthi was “relying on his Trump-aligned allies” to tear her down with millions of dollars in attack ads. “His MAGA-backed crypto bros are dumping $7 million into this race to try to stop me. Illinoisans aren’t buying it,” she wrote.

The connection of crypto with Trump and Republicans more broadly is understandable. Marc Andreesen, one of the founders and major donors to Fairshake, has previously expressed his support for Trump, and said he’d be voting for him in 2024. Trump and his family members are themselves part of crypto investment schemes. 

And the money doesn’t lie. Fairshake is technically non-partisan, but it has spent more in support of Republican candidates. According to Open Secrets, some 62% of its expenditures support Republicans and oppose Democrats, while 37% of its expenditures support Democrats and oppose Republicans.

This didn’t appear to sit well with voters, nor with other officials representing Illinois. Senator Tammy Duckworth claimed that Krishnamoorthi could be “compromised” by industry interests, an idea the representative denied. 

A 2025 poll found that Illinois voters held largely favorable opinions about cryptocurrencies, but many also supported restrictions. Some 47% of Democratic voters would support “policies restricting the growth of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.” 

Overall, 36% of Illinois voters “would be more likely to support elected officials who support restrictions on cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.”

Some election observers pointed out that Stratton had taken significant donations from current Illinois Governor JB Pritzker. But one Chicago voter told The Washington Post, “How many billionaires are supporting Raja?” The governor, by contrast, was “supporting his own lieutenant governor. That’s a nonissue for me. He should be doing it.”

Crypto lobby ramps up as midterms approach 

The Illinois primary is just one of many races in which the crypto industry will spend money on ads and other support materials this year. 

At the end of 2025, Fairshake alone had $190 million in cash on hand, $131 million of which it raised in the last half of the year.

Lawmakers and activists alike are concerned about the undue influence this could have on the midterm election outcomes. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a noted skeptic of the crypto industry, said that the Illinois primary would be “the test case for whether or not they can buy whatever candidate they want for Senate in Illinois and many of the congressional seats.” 

Saurav Ghosh, the director of the Campaign Legal Center, previously told Cointelegraph, “This kind of influence buying ultimately undermines the democratic process by marginalizing everyday Americans, ensuring that their voices and interests take a backseat to the crypto industry’s deregulatory desires.”

Related: Crypto PACs secure massive war chests ahead of US midterms

The increasing association with crypto, MAGA and Trump could also prove problematic for keeping industry interests in Washington. Trump has negative approval ratings in all but 8 of the 50 states. Republicans are also facing predominant disapproval in the polls. If crypto becomes a byword for a Republican economic agenda, it may not work favorably in the midterms. 

Political operatives have noted that, for the crypto lobby to retain influence, it needs to remain bipartisan. Democratic Representative Sam Liccardo told Politico last year, “I don’t think anybody in this town would recommend that an industry put their eggs in one party’s basket.”

In Congress, there are still a significant number of Democrats who are pro-crypto, or at the very least, not entirely opposed to the blockchain industry.

Filecoin Foundation chair Marta Belcher said, “Many policymakers on both sides of the aisle support crypto. I don’t think crypto is a partisan issue, just like ‘the internet’ isn’t a partisan issue. I don’t think, in 2025, either party can be ‘anti’ an entire technology if they’re thinking seriously about America’s future.”

Magazine: Big Questions: Can Bitcoin save you from the dreaded Cantillon Effect?