Home Blog Page 604

Institutions are scooping up Bitcoin again as Iran war sparks $2.3bn ETF buying spree – DL News

0

  • Institutional investors have poured $2.3 billion into Bitcoin ETFs over the past four weeks.
  • That’s despite a market downturn that’s shaved off half of the cryptocurrency’s value.
  • Institutional investors are expected to pour up to $13 trillion into Bitcoin by 2030.

James Butterfill says companies used to treat him like a dirty secret.

As CoinShares’ head of research, one of his jobs is to meet prospective institutional investors and try to convince them to trust the asset management firm to invest their money into cryptocurrencies.

Five years ago, that was a tall order.

“We would generally meet them in the corner of some coffee shop because they were worried about the image it would portray of them meeting some crypto guys,” Butterfill told DL News.

But things have changed.

“Now we’re being invited into the boardrooms,” he said.

The shift marks a dramatic change in institutional investors’ attitude towards digital assets. In the past, they often viewed Bitcoin and altcoins with scepticism, as speculative assets that only hedge funds and family offices with huge risk appetites dared to touch.

Now, pension funds and university superannuation funds are pouring capital into Bitcoin exchange-traded funds and digital asset treasuries to get exposure to cryptoassets.

They’re expected to pile up to $13 trillion into Bitcoin investments alone by 2030, according to Ark Invest, an ETF provider.

Their bullishness comes at a peculiar time for the crypto industry.

Bitcoin trades some 40% below its October record high.

On the one hand, the industry has never had more governmental support. On the other, it has lost almost half of its market value since October, and uncertainties surrounding the war in the Middle East threaten to exacerbate market jitters.

Even so, most of the firms DL News spoke to that provide crypto investment services to institutional investors remain optimistic — the market, they say, will bounce back soon.

“Believe it or not, most institutional investors have still not allocated to crypto,” Zach Pandl, head of research at Grayscale, told DL News. “They therefore tend to see drawdowns as an opportunity to build positions at compelling prices.”

The turn

US President Donald Trump is a key driver behind the changing attitude among institutional investors.

“Regardless what you think about Trump, he’s done a lot of things to the asset class,” Butterfill said.

Since taking office, Trump has appointed crypto supporters to key government roles, signed executive orders to create a national Bitcoin reserve and banned the creation of a central bank-issued digital dollar.

He has also pardoned industry leaders, signed a landmark stablecoin bill into law, and backed the Clarity Act, a bill designed to clarify the rules the industry must adhere to.

More importantly, his policies, and the appointment of Paul Atkins to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, have effectively halted the tougher policing of the Joe Biden years.

In its place, Atkins, and his counterpart at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Michael Selig, have introduced regulatory guidelines that the industry could only dream of a few years ago.

“All of that has just improved the legitimacy of the asset class,” Butterfill said.

To be sure, these firms have reason to talk up the shifting attitudes towards the industry — their business models depend on the idea that more people will invest in cryptocurrencies.

That being said, Wall Street is positioning itself to capitalise on what they see as a wave of interest in blockchain-backed investments.

This week, banking giant Morgan Stanley launched a Bitcoin ETF to compete with the ones of investment giants BlackRock and Fidelity, and US mortgage-finance giant Fannie Mae is said to soon accept crypto-backed mortgages.

Elsewhere, JPMorgan, led by it’s perennial Bitcoin sceptic CEO Jamie Dimon, has started to allow institutional clients to pledge their crypto holdings to secure loans.

The October crash

Two major factors still demand vigilance among investors: the $19 billion market implosion in October, and uncertainties caused by the war in Iran.

That’s triggered renewed concerns from investors about digital assets’ ties to crime, volatility, computing risks and crypto’s impact on the environment.

Despite the downturn following the joint US and Israeli attack on Iran, Bitcoin has performed better than equities and gold.

Investment managers tell DL News that this fact has incentivised institutional investors to bet on the asset class — especially as they expect things to get better soon.

Whales are to blame for the downturn, Butterfill argues. Many individuals who own over 10,000 Bitcoin believe that the cryptocurrency’s price adheres to a four-year cycle.

This cycle starts at every halving, an event where the reward for mining Bitcoin drops by half. This usually sets the stage for a massive rally that culminates about 18 months later. Then the price starts to drop, and won’t rise again until the next rally.

“I would argue that that’s nonsense because the supply is perfectly known for the next 100 years,” Butterfill said.

Even so, whales that adhere to the idea of the four-year cycle started to take profit in October, he said.

The good news?

“That’s slowing right down, which is quite encouraging,” Butterfill said, predicting that the selling will end in April and pave the way for Bitcoin’s price to start its climb back above $80,000.

Bitcoin ETFs’ $2.3 billion haul

Since February 23, investors have injected over $2.3 billion into Bitcoin ETFs, marking four solid weeks of inflows into those funds, according to DefiLlama data.

“That’s quite encouraging,” Butterfill said.

While that doesn’t offset the $1.6 billion pulled out of these funds since October, Bitcoin ETFs still hold over $83 billion worth of Bitcoin.

“Crypto ETF demand has been remarkably sticky,” Pandl said.

Eric Johansson is DL News’ managing editor. Got a tip? Email at eric@dlnews.com.

Global Scam Losses Hit $442bn as Vyntra Warns of Industrialised AI Fraud

0

Financial fraud has evolved from isolated incidents into highly organized, industrial-scale operations. Vyntra’s newly released 2026 fraud trends report, The Anatomy of Modern Banking Fraud, reveals that global scam losses have reached a staggering $442billion over the past 12 months. The data shows that 70 per cent of adults worldwide have experienced at least one scam attempt, with 23 per cent ultimately losing money.

The primary catalyst for this surge is the weaponisation of artificial intelligence. Fraudsters are actively deploying large language models (LLMs) and generative AI to create convincing messages and impersonate trusted individuals or organisations at an unprecedented scale. According to the report, advances in AI have slashed the time required to build a credible phishing campaign from more than 16 hours down to under five minutes. This extreme efficiency allows criminals to launch thousands of highly personalised scams simultaneously.

The shrinking window for intervention

With these hyper-personalised tools at their disposal, criminals are moving money through the financial system faster than ever before. Vyntra’s research indicates that nearly two-thirds of scams now succeed within a single day of the first point of contact. This rapid success rate leaves banks and payment providers with a drastically shrinking window for intervention.

The 2026 report outlines the top ten scam typologies expected to dominate the year ahead, including executive impersonation, safe account fraud, romance scams, phishing-enabled account takeover, QR code abuse, and recruitment fraud. Across these categories, fraudsters are layering multiple techniques—combining AI-generated emails, voice cloning, deepfake videos, and spoofed identities—to dramatically increase their credibility and accelerate victim manipulation.

The broader societal cost and APP scams

For financial institutions, the operational implications are stark. Authorised Push Payment (APP) scams, where victims are manipulated into initiating the bank transfers themselves, continue to rise sharply. Concurrently, phishing-enabled account takeovers are increasing in sophistication, often marrying AI communication with carefully orchestrated money mule networks designed to monetise stolen funds almost instantly.

Beyond the immediate financial losses, Vyntra highlights that modern fraud increasingly intersects with organised crime and human trafficking, amplifying its broader societal cost. Law enforcement agencies, including Europol and the United Nations, have warned that these large-scale scam operations are frequently tied to criminal networks that actively exploit vulnerable populations.

The industry response and collaborative defense
Joël Winteregg, CEO of Vyntra

Against this escalating backdrop, Vyntra stresses the critical importance of real-time behavioral analytics, community intelligence, and collaborative detection as necessary countermeasures. By combining transaction context, behavioral signals, and shared industry intelligence, financial institutions can detect and block high-value payments linked to invoice manipulation or crypto concentration accounts before the funds ever leave the banking system.

Joël Winteregg, CEO of Vyntra, emphasised the need for a structural shift in how banks approach the threat.

“Fraud should not be seen as a peripheral operational risk as it is now a systemic threat to trust in digital finance,” Winteregg stated. He noted that banks must move from reactive case handling to proactive, AI-driven detection capable of connecting scam typologies, behavioural anomalies, and monetisation patterns in real time. According to Winteregg, the institutions that adapt the fastest will be best positioned to protect their customers and meet evolving regulatory expectations.

The report concludes that fraud prevention can no longer operate in a silo. As instant payment rails accelerate the movement of funds, initiatives such as pan-European fraud signal sharing, AI-driven cross-border payment monitoring, and structured intelligence exchanges between banks and regulators are emerging as essential components of modern financial defense.

Bill Proposes To Stop Government Officials Betting on Prediction Markets

0

US lawmakers have introduced a second bill this week aimed at curbing prediction market insider trading by government officials, amid growing concerns over such activity on major platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket.

In an announcement on Thursday, US lawmakers Todd Young, Elissa Slotkin, John Curtis and Adam Schiff unveiled the bipartisan Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026.

“No one should be profiting off the information and knowledge gained as a public servant, period,” Slotkin said, adding: “This bill is an important first step in placing common sense rules around prediction markets, and it has real teeth to ensure those who break these rules face real consequences.”

The bill underscores growing unease that prediction markets could become a new frontier for insider trading, as bets tied to real-world events blur the line between wagering and financial activity. 

Bill aims to stop insider profiteering

The latest bill, introduced in the second session of the 119th Congress, aims to prohibit government executives from using “insider information to bet on a prediction market contract.”

Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026 document. Source: John Curtis  

If enacted, the Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026 would cover the president, vice president and politicians across Congress, the House of Representatives and the Senate. 

It would also cover political appointees and “employees of an Executive agency or independent regulatory agency.”

The bill defines insider information as anything that a “reasonable investor would consider important in making a decision related to a prediction market contract and is not publicly available.”

It also outlines reporting requirements under which a government official must report any contract wagers over $250 within 30 days to the supervising ethics office. The individual must include “the number of contracts purchased, price of contract, date and time of transaction, name of contract, position taken on contract, name of trading platform used, profit or loss made on transaction.”

The penalties will see individuals charged the greater of $500 or twice the profit made from the prediction market contract.

Related: SEC is no longer a ‘cop on the beat‘ on crypto, says US lawmaker

The bills come amid an increasing number of state and federal lawmakers taking aim at prediction markets.