Home Blog Page 239

Citi predicts the tokenized securities market will grow to $5.5 trillion by 2030

0

Putting real-world investments onchain, a process called tokenization, is moving out of the testing phase and into everyday business.

Citi’s new report Tokenization 2030: Wall Street On-Chain shared with CoinDesk ahead of Proof of Talk in Paris, shows that the global market for thse digital investments sits at just $17 billion today.

However, Citi expects this market to increase to $5.5 trillion by 2030 in its base forecast. Depending on how fast adoption take place, that could land anywhere from a low end estimate of $2.7 trillion to a bullish forecast of $8.2 trillion, Citi said.

As the report points out, this is a major turning point: “You’re seeing the full weight of American financial power and the global reserve currency moving on change at scale,” Citi says in the report. “When DTCC and the NYSE embed tokenization into capital markets, this marks a tipping point.”

According to Citi, three big shifts are driving this trillions of dollars move.

First, the traditional companies that run the world’s stock markets are building this technology directly into their regular trading systems.

In early May, Wall Street giant Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) announced it would start limited production trades of tokenized securities in July, with a broader launch of its platform set for October. Nasdaq is working on a framework for companies to issue blockchain-based shares with a potential launch as early as 2027. Intercontinental Exchange, which owns the New York Stock Exchange, also has plans for tokenized stocks.

Nasdaq also received regulatory approval to allow certain stocks to be issued and traded in this digital onchain form.

Second, the rise of trusted digital cash is providing the missing piece to make thse trades settle instantly. Standard stablecoins are expected to grow to $1.9 trillion market by 2030, working alongside digital bank deposits to allow assets and cash to swap at the exact same moment. The report expects that the growth of stablecoins alone could create about $1 trillion in new demand for U.S. government bonds, because the companies issuing stablecoins back their digital cash with these real bonds.

Third, the government rules are getting clearer, with a key piece of U.S. digital asset legislation moving forward to a full U.S. Senate vote. On May 14, the Senate Banking Committee managed to end a four-month stall with a 15-9 bipartisan approval by the committee, which advanced the Clarity Act to its next step.

The Citi report notes that the growth they forecast will happen in mainstream public markets, such as U.S. stocks and government bonds, rather than private markets, which are harder to trade and change slowly.

Citi assumes that 10% of the U.S. Treasury bill market and 3% of the U.S. public stock market will be tokenized by 2030. If just 10% of everyday U.S. investors switch to these new digital trading platforms, it would create $2.6 trillion in demand for digital stocks.

On the other side, complex areas like private credit and private equity are each expected to reach a much smaller $100 billion globally by 2030.

The shift will not happen overnight, Citi noted, saying that instead, old and new financial systems will have to run side by side for a while.

The report compares this to how highways adopted electronic toll tags like E-ZPass. Toll roads did not become fully automated in one day. Instead, states built wider roads with parallel lanes for both cash and automated drivers, which added extra cost and confusion before everyone eventually switched over to the fully automated system.

Ultimately, this new setup will give a major advantage to “Structural Orchestrators”. These are the specific big banks and investment firms that control both the real assets and the digital cash rails used to pay for them, allowing them to handle the entire trade inside their own network.

Three Sui mainnet halts in 48 hours traced to an upgrade bug by developers

0

A new feature shipped in Sui’s v1.72 release exposed an edge case in the Layer-1 blockchain’s gas-charging logic that halted mainnet three separate times across May 28 and May 29, with each fix either triggering or exposing the next failure, the Sui Foundation said in a post-mortem published Sunday.

The first outage began at roughly 7 a.m. PT on Thursday and lasted close to seven hours.

According to the foundation, it stemmed from a rare issue in how the network charged gas for transactions paying with a mix of the new address-balance feature and traditional coin objects. The bug caused validators to crash with an underflow error when a transaction was canceled for insufficient funds, but the gas-smashing routine still tried to spend those same funds.

Think of a coin object as a digital banknote. A user’s SUI balance isn’t a single number — it’s a stack of distinct “notes,” each with its own ID, that can be moved or combined. The wallet might hold three coin objects worth 60, 30, and 10 SUI rather than a single 100-SUI balance. To pay for something, the network combines the notes it needs.

Validators are computers (and the operators behind them) that run the network by processing transactions, voting on which ones are valid, and keeping the chain alive.

The core team brought the network back up around 1:30 p.m. PT with what it called an “interim fix” that addressed the most common version of the bug but carried “a known issue with a low probability of causing a halt.” The team accepted that risk to restore the mainnet quickly while a more robust fix was developed.

The known risk materialized the next morning. A second outage began around 5 a.m. PT on Friday, when a transaction triggered a masked variant of the same bug, in which the insufficient-funds error was overridden by another cancellation reason, bypassing the interim patch. The core team finished a more robust fix, and validators adopted it by about 9:40 a.m. PT.

The third halt was a knock-on from the second. When validators restarted to install the robust fix, validator participation in the protocol that bootstraps the network’s on-chain randomness fell below the required threshold, and randomness disabled itself as designed.

(On-chain randomness is a protocol the network uses to produce a number nobody can predict or fake, even though every validator has to agree on the same value. Apps that depend on chance — lotteries, certain games, random NFT mints — can’t run without it.)

A latent bug then failed to persist that disabled state to disk, leaving validators unaware on the next restart that randomness had been turned off. The next epoch change stalled for close to six hours as randomness-dependent transactions piled up in a paused queue.

No user funds were at risk during any of the outages, and no committed transactions were reverted, the foundation said.

SUI dropped roughly 8% during the cascade to a low of $0.90 and was trading near $0.90 on Monday, leaving the token down about 19% on the week, per CoinDesk data.

The events represent Sui’s third major reliability incident since its 2023 mainnet launch, following a two-hour transaction scheduling bug in November 2024 and a six-hour consensus divergence in January 2026.

Ripple-linked token hits 15-week low

0

XRP slid to its weakest level in more than three months as heavy selling overpowered signs of exchange outflows, leaving the market stuck between two competing signals. Tokens moving off exchanges usually point to accumulation, but price action is saying sellers still have control whenever XRP tries to recover.

News Background

• More than 25 million XRP left exchanges after a large inflow earlier in the week, suggesting some investors used the drop to move tokens into longer-term storage.

• Spot XRP ETFs recorded fresh inflows, bringing cumulative flows to about $1.42 billion, though that demand has not yet been enough to reverse the downtrend.

• Leverage was heavily flushed during May, with most high-risk long positions already liquidated as XRP bounced from the $1.28 area.

Price Action Summary

• XRP dropped from $1.3384 to $1.3208, hitting a 15-week low during the session.
• The key breakdown came on 55.03 million in volume, which pushed price through support near $1.3320.
• Selling later extended toward $1.314 before a modest bounce brought XRP back toward $1.32.

Technical Analysis

• The key issue is that accumulation signals are not yet showing up in price. Exchange outflows are constructive, but XRP continues to get sold into recovery attempts.
• The breakdown below $1.3320 keeps the short-term structure weak, with $1.34 now acting as the first level buyers need to reclaim.
• A large short-liquidation cluster sits between $1.34 and $1.40, meaning a sharp move higher is possible if XRP can break back into that range.
• Until then, the tape remains defensive, with sellers still controlling the lower highs.

What traders should watch

• $1.31 is the immediate support. Losing it would put $1.28 and then $1.20 back in play.
• $1.34 is the first recovery level. A reclaim could trigger momentum toward $1.37 and $1.40.
• The setup is unstable because exchange outflows point one way while price action points the other. One side will have to give.

Alephium Bridge Loses $815K to Forged Guardian Messages, Not Stolen Keys

0

Alephium’s Wormhole-fork TokenBridge was drained on Ethereum and BNB Chain in roughly seven minutes after an off-chain backend flaw let fraudulent messages slip past its four-guardian network, the team said in a public correction.

Alephium, a proof-of-work Layer 1 that runs a private fork of the Wormhole bridge, lost about $815,000 across Ethereum and BNB Chain on Friday after an attacker pushed forged messages through the bridge backend and out the other side as legitimate-looking transfers, according to the team. Alephium has shut the bridge down and said no new transactions can be initiated.

The attacker drained 200,967 USDT, 17,594 USDC, 5.18 WETH and 0.335 WBTC on Ethereum, plus 36,750 USDT and 24.386 WBNB on BNB Chain, per Alephium’s accounting, and minted 13.76 million wrapped ALPH on Ethereum with no corresponding ALPH locked on the Alephium chain. The full sequence took about seven minutes, according to blockchain security firm Blockaid, which spotted the exploit first and brought in the SEAL 911 emergency-response unit.

The headline number is small by the standards of 2026’s bridge year — PeckShield data put cumulative cross-chain bridge losses at roughly $329 million through mid-May — but the attack mechanism is the part to watch. Initial reports, including from Blockaid, blamed compromised guardian keys. Alephium and Blockaid have since revised that.

What Actually Broke

In a follow-up post, Blockaid said the exploit “does not appear to have involved a compromise of guardian private keys. Instead, it appears to have involved an exploit that allowed forged malicious events/messages to be observed and signed by guardians.” Alephium’s own post-incident statement traced the root cause to “an off-chain vulnerability in the bridge backend that could be triggered in specific edge cases” and ruled out both a smart-contract bug and a key compromise.

The distinction is the story. A stolen-key incident is an operational-security failure — a guardian custodian losing control of a signing device. A forged-event incident is a software-layer flaw between the bridge’s on-chain contracts and the off-chain process that feeds the guardians what to sign. The guardians, in other words, signed valid signatures over invalid data. Six of those signed approvals were enough to drain the bridge.

Four-Guardian Set

Alephium’s fork uses four guardians with a quorum of three. Wormhole’s mainnet, by comparison, runs 19 guardians and a 13-signature quorum. Under the larger Wormhole set, a backend bug that pushes a forged message to a single guardian still has to convince twelve more. Under a four-guardian set, the same bug only has to convince two. The math is unforgiving once the off-chain feed is wrong.

ALPH held inside the bridge itself was not drained and is recoverable, the team said, and Alephium has urged ALPH holders on Ethereum and BNB Chain to pull liquidity from Uniswap and PancakeSwap pools immediately. Any swap activity now lets the attacker convert the 13.76 million unbacked wrapped ALPH still in the exploiter wallet into real value.

A Pattern Beat Across 2026

Cross-chain bridges have been the busiest target in DeFi this year. The Verus-Ethereum bridge lost $11.5 million on May 18 to a backing-validation flaw — the same class of bug, fraudulent messages clearing a check they should have failed — and the Gravity Bridge was drained of $5.4 million on May 30 in a suspected signing-key compromise. CrossCurve and Hyperbridge fell to fabricated-message and verifier bugs earlier in the year. The exposures vary; the architecture rarely does.

Alephium said the recovery process for users with ALPH locked in the bridge will be announced next week, alongside a full technical postmortem and details of a compensation plan. The bridge stays offline until then.

Coinbase makes a major play for India’s booming $3 billion crypto market with local currency launch

0

Nasdaq-listed Coinbase exchange announced Monday a major market move: the launch of direct rails for Indian rupees (INR).

Starting June 1, 2026, the exchange’s Indian customers can deposit and withdraw rupees directly from their bank accounts via the Immediate Payment Service (IMPS), a move designed to eliminate the need for intermediaries and simplify the often-clunky process of entering the crypto market in the region.

For a long time, Indians have had to rely on Peer-to-Peer (P2P) markets or third-party intermediaries to fund their crypto accounts. This method can be slow and, at times, risky, often leaving vulnerable users to payment scams or the sudden freezing of their bank accounts by law enforcement due to suspicious fund trails from unknown counterparties. Coinbase is bypassing that by integrating directly with the Immediate Payment Service (IMPS).

Coinbase’s latest move means its customers can transfer funds from their local bank accounts directly to the Coinbase platform and back again.

“India has long been one of the most important markets in crypto, in terms of developer talent, trading activity, and the broader adoption of blockchain technology,” said John O’Loghlen, Coinbase’s Head of APAC, in the announcement shared with CoinDesk.

The country has been ranked among the top countries driving crypto adoption in the APAC market in 2025, and ranked first in the Global Crypto Adoption Index, according to Chainalysis data. In fact, according to the consulting firm Imarc, the Indian cryptocurrency market reached $3.04 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $14.21 billion by 2034, growing at a CAGR of 18.66% during 2026-2034 time period.

‘Here for the long-term’

The launch isn’t just for beginners, however. While retail traders can access spot markets for major assets, the platform is also introducing perpetual futures contracts.

For the “pro” crowd, the “Coinbase Advanced” suite will offer institutional-grade tools, including TradingView integration and sophisticated APIs. Notably, by building local INR order books, Coinbase ensures users aren’t trading against global prices but have dedicated liquidity right at home.

The goal is to provide the same platform trusted by global institutions to India’s massive retail base, Coinbase said.

Regulation has always been the elephant in the room for crypto in India.

Coinbase first opened its platform to Indians in 2022 but ran into a roadblock within days when the UPI operator, National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), dismissed Coinbase’s then launch of UPI support, saying it was unaware of any such arrangement involving a crypto exchange.

Coinbase is tackling regulatory challenges head-on this time by registering with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU-IND), the central national agency responsible for analyzing and disseminating information on suspicious financial transactions.

The FIU registration is a clear signal that the exchange is seeking a long-term presence in the world’s fastest-growing major economy and most populous country.

The latest offering builds on years of quiet groundwork. Coinbase is already an investor in local exchange CoinDCX and has funneled over $1 million into Indian developers through its “Base” Layer 2 network.

“With the launch of direct INR rails, we’re making Coinbase fully accessible to Indian retail traders, with the same platform trusted by institutions and traders around the world. We’re registered with FIU-IND and here for the long-term,” O’Loghlen said.

Trace Mayer says bitcoin’s (BTC) falling volatility signals institutional maturity, not weakness

0

Bitcoin’s trademark volatility was for years treated as both its greatest feature and its biggest flaw. Recently, that roller coaster has quieted into something resembling a smooth ride, with volatility collapsing to roughly 35 from a high of 120 in 2021. While critics view this dampening as a sign that the asset is losing its edge, longtime bitcoin investor and Mayer Multiple creator Trace Mayer argues they are drawing entirely the wrong conclusion.

Mayer suggested that bitcoin’s declining volatility isn’t a sign of weakness, but rather a direct reflection of its growing economic substance in an interview with CoinDesk.

“Gary Gensler said he was going to ‘tame bitcoin,'” Mayer said, pointing to regulatory efforts to corral the digital asset. “And we’ve seen the volatility come down.”

Rather than viewing this “taming” as a defeat, Mayer sees it as confirmation of bitcoin’s massive institutional adoption. The market has simply become too big to move as erratically as it once did. “The barbell is getting heavier,” Mayer noted, using a vivid analogy for the market’s liquidity. “It’s not a 50-pound weight anymore. It’s a 2,500-pound weight.”

This heavy structural shift is being driven by the sophisticated mechanics of the options market, specifically call-selling, according to Mayer. As institutions and digital asset companies increasingly sell covered calls against their bitcoin holdings to generate upfront premium income, they inadvertently create a dampening effect on price swings.

Because these entities essentially agree to sell their bitcoin at a predetermined price in the future, market makers on the other side of those trades are forced to actively hedge their positions. When the price of bitcoin ticks upward, these market makers sell the asset to balance their risk, effectively creating a natural, structural ceiling on price spikes. The result is a more mature, predictable asset—one that is growing up right in front of the market’s eyes.

“When you’re able to come in and sell call volatility into the market, the market makers are going to have to do negative delta,” Mayer said. “That negative call wall is like adding weight on the barbell. The price doesn’t necessarily go up, but the total economic substance of that asset has increased.”

The Mayer Multiple

Mayer created the Mayer Multiple ratio eight years ago that divides bitcoin’s current price by its 200-day moving average, a long-term trend line that smooths out short-term noise. A reading above 1 means bitcoin is trading above its long-term average, below 1 means it’s trading beneath it. Historically, readings above 2.4 have coincided with market tops, while readings below 0.8 have signalled attractive entry points.

Bitcoin is currently just below its long-term trend at 0.94. Mayer notes that crucially the standard deviation bands the statistical range within which price typically moves have compressed significantly as more trading history accumulates.

On a five-year lookback, one standard deviation above the mean sits around 1.3, two standard deviations at 1.6, and three at 2.13. Compare that to earlier periods drawing on data back to 2011, where price regularly reached far more extreme multiples.

In other words, the instrument is maturing in the same way any asset does as it attracts deeper, more disciplined capital.

Mayer started selling physically-settled bitcoin call and put options as far back as 2017 on LedgerX, one of the first federally regulated crypto derivatives exchanges.

Today that market has expanded dramatically from leveraged ETFs like BITX, to Strategy’s (MSTR) equity, to bitcoin appearing on corporate balance sheets like SpaceX’s reported 18,712 BTC holding.

Mayer argues lower volatility is positive for bitcoin because it reflects the asset graduating from a speculative instrument into something that investment committees, family offices, and corporations can actually underwrite. “In order to get that buy-in, you kind of have to have something that’s really boring, like gold,” he said. “Gold is so boring — and that’s what we need.”

He pointed to attendance at conferences as a tangible signal of that maturation. His blog was running in 2008 before Bitcoin existed, and he regularly presented at major gold conferences that drew 2,000-3,000 attendees. “We had tens of thousands at conferences this year and much more last year. It’s a real industry. It’s a real reserve asset.”

Mayer acknowledges risks to bitcoin, such as weakening network security should BTC’s price not appreciate enough to keep enough miners in business. Quantum is another potential longer-term threat, should quantum computers become sufficiently powerful to crack Bitcoin’s cryptographic keys. Mayer acknowledged the concern but noted that Bitcoin’s standing bounty for finding a catastrophic exploit has so far gone unclaimed, and pointed to the backwards compatibility of proof-of-work as a structural resilience.

Despite the risks, Mayer remains firmly in the bitcoin-over-gold camp for the next 15 years. “With gold, higher prices bring more supply. That’s not the case with Bitcoin and we don’t know what technologies might pose a threat to gold’s dominance. We could have asteroid mining. AI robots scouring the oceans. But we know Bitcoin is going to be 21 million.”

How the House Financial Services Committee is taking on tokenization: State of Crypto

0

Last month, Rep. French Hill, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, told CoinDesk that he expected the Clarity Act to secure bipartisan consensus, that tokenization was the next major agenda item and that crypto would continue to receive bipartisan support.

You’re reading State of Crypto, a CoinDesk newsletter looking at the intersection of cryptocurrency and government. Click here to sign up for future editions.

The narrative

After stablecoins and market structure, tokenization is the next major focus for the House Financial Services Committee, Chairman French Hill told CoinDesk last month.

Why it matters

The House Financial Services Committee is one of the few groups in Congress with direct oversight over federal regulators working on digital asset policy. It played a key role in advancing both the stablecoin-focused GENIUS Act and the market structure-focused Clarity Act. Hill has run the committee since former Chairman Patrick McHenry retired from Congress.

Breaking it down

The House of Representatives found a way to get bipartisan agreement on stablecoin sales practices, decentralized finance and ethics rules before passing its version of the Clarity Act, Hill said.

“These are all things we dealt with in the House bill successfully and got 78 Democratic votes in the House last year,” he said. “So I don’t see any reason why they can’t find consensus in the Senate on the House bill.”

Hill spoke to CoinDesk at the Digital Assets and Emerging Tech Policy Summit hosted by Vanderbilt University and the Blockchain Association in early April about a range of issues his committee is examining.

He said the Senate counterpart to the House’s bill had begun adopting some of the House version’s details as lawmakers negotiated aspects of the legislation ahead of this month’s Senate Banking Committee markup.

“I think the Senate’s relied quite a bit on the House work on both FIT21 [the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act] from the previous Congress and Clarity in this Congress,” he said in April. “I think you see that quite clearly in the Senate Agriculture markup, I think you see that in the basic draft of many of the components in the Senate bill.”

Senate negotiators have kept their House counterparts “apprised of the process,” he said, adding that both he and Rep. Bryan Steil, who chairs the House Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial Intelligence, have been in touch with senators working on the Clarity Act.

His committee is now looking at other issues, like tokenization and lawmakers’ role in that area, he said. The Financial Services Committee held a hearing on tokenization in late March, which Hill said was aimed at helping lawmakers consider what the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and bank regulators might need in terms of additional authorities or rules to facilitate companies engaging in tokenizing real-world assets.

Part of this effort is determining whether there even needs to be a legislative effort, or if policymaking could remain at the regulator level, he said.

“Tokenization of an asset, such as a common stock, is really an exercise in changing systems,” he said. “It’s not changing the law. All the legal or regulatory requirements about common stock are also applied to a common stock token, right? And so in our view, that’s why these hearings bring up member awareness.”

The House and Senate, as overseers of the regulatory agencies, can, for example, use hearings to ask how existing systems can be adopted to blockchain-based systems, he said.

In a similar vein, Hill said he was looking at the possible tokenization of deposits in the commercial banking industry, which could enable direct debit payments without needing an intermediated stop.

This isn’t necessarily imminent, but it is an area that his committee may explore, he said.

“You think about going from call-out markets right to paper-based markets to digitization of that paper-based system, which took place in the 1970s and 1980s, and that’s increased accuracy, reduced fraud, increased speed, decreased the need for liquidity [and] improved settlement,” he said. “We went from T+5 on equities in the 1970s to T+1. So to me, this is an operating decision, and the interoperability of it is the biggest challenge, not the mechanical, technical aspect of doing it.”

Tokenized markets will, therefore, need work on interoperability and compliance, he said.

“We’ll find out if there needs to be some, you know, legislative activity versus purely regulatory, and that’s good. That’s what Congress’s job is,” he said.

The other major topic he’s tracking — at least in the crypto world — is the effort to update tax regulations around digital assets, he said. The House Ways and Means Committee is already working on tax issues, and a bipartisan group of lawmakers reintroduced a bill specifically targeting crypto taxes earlier this month.

And of course, there will be an election later this year that will determine control of the House of Representatives and Senate. The crypto industry is, as it was in 2024, heavily engaged in primary races, trying to bolster candidates that the various political action committees see as being friendly toward crypto.

Hill said the Financial Services Committee in particular has long been engaged in digital assets, referencing work by former Rep. Patrick McHenry and his Democratic counterpart, Rep. Maxine Waters, over the past 10 years.

“In the past four years, we’ve seen the digital assets ecosystem really engage, not only on policy points, but also politically,” Hill said. “And you saw that in the 2024 election … So I anticipate that the digital assets ecosystem, political activity will be important to the 2026 election. It’s bipartisan. It’s supportive of people who are pro-innovation.”

Hill said the industry’s political engagement in this year’s vote is important, and that there is already bipartisan appetite for crypto.

“If we’re successful in GENIUS rulemaking, and we’re successful in passing Clarity, you’ll commence about a 12-month joint rulemaking process between the CFTC and SEC,” Hill said. “And I really think policy attention will track back into the regulatory agencies to try to make sure that our vision in the House of an integrated, common, fit-for-purpose approach is absolutely implemented.”

Thursday

  • 14:00 UTC (10 a.m. ET) The House Financial Services Committee will hold an oversight hearing with federal bank regulators.

If you’ve got thoughts or questions on what I should discuss next week or any other feedback you’d like to share, feel free to email me at nik@coindesk.com or find me on Bluesky @nikhileshde.bsky.social.

You can also join the group conversation on Telegram.

See ya’ll next week!

A massive $1.26 billion sale of BlackRock’s IBIT was likely a rapid exit by a large investor, NYDIG says

0

A $1.26 billion block sale of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) this week might have been driven by a large investor seeking a rapid exit from bitcoin exposure rather than the unwinding of a common hedge-fund trading strategy.

That’s according to an analysis published by crypto investment firm NYDIG.

The transaction took place on May 26, when 29.21 million IBIT shares changed hands off-exchange at $43.16 per share. The trade was executed at a $1.01 discount to IBIT’s market price of $44.17 at the time, representing a 2.3% concession and roughly $29.5 million in execution costs.

NYDIG said the size of the discount suggests the seller prioritized certainty and speed over maximizing price. The trade was reported through the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF Carteret facility, which is commonly used for privately negotiated off-exchange transactions.

Some market participants had speculated the block could have been tied to a bitcoin basis trade, in which investors hold spot bitcoin exposure while shorting futures contracts.

NYDIG rejected that explanation, arguing that the discount would have significantly reduced the strategy’s expected returns.

The firm also pointed to activity in CME bitcoin futures. The IBIT position represented exposure equivalent to roughly 3,700 CME bitcoin futures contracts.

Yet only 91 contracts traded during the minute in which the block was executed, with no unusual spike in futures volume.

“The size of the trade, the 2.3% execution discount, the absence of corresponding CME futures activity, and the limited universe of potential sellers collectively weigh against the view that the transaction represented a contemporaneous basis-trade unwind,” NYDIG’s global head of research, Greg Cipolaro, wrote.

The sale came as U.S. spot bitcoin ETFs see sustained outflows. According to SoSoValue data, the funds recorded daily net outflows on every trading day from May 15 through May 29. Total assets across the category fell from $107.75 billion on May 14 to $94.17 billion by May 29. Meanwhile, the bitcoin price fell 16% this year, while most other assets, such as equities and commodities, have surged as capital continues to flow out of crypto.

Read more: Bitcoin drops to 13th largest asset as capital flees to AI and precious metals

Difficult to identify

While IBIT recorded about $720 million in net redemptions across May 26 and May 27, NYDIG said ETF flow data cannot be used to directly identify the seller or link specific redemptions to the block transaction.

NYDIG noted that the position exceeded the reported holdings of every disclosed IBIT investor in recent 13F filings, making identification difficult.

The firm said public data cannot determine whether the sale was driven by investor redemptions, risk-management constraints or a discretionary decision to reduce bitcoin exposure.

Still, NYDIG said the transaction stands out because a large holder chose to accept a significant discount to exit a bitcoin-linked position worth more than $1 billion during a period of persistent outflows and as the price of bitcoin remains below $80,000.

Argentine Prosecutors Arrest 24, Seize Over $8M in USDT in ‘Fake Coins’ Crypto-Fraud Sweep

0

The Buenos Aires Public Prosecutor’s Office said it ran 90 simultaneous raids and froze more than 8 million USDT across three fraud rings — fake trading apps, WhatsApp hijacks, and a Chinese-origin infostealer operation — in what it calls the province’s largest crypto seizure to date.

Argentina’s Buenos Aires Public Prosecutor’s Office said it arrested 24 people and seized more than 8 million USDT in a nationwide sweep it called “Fake Coins,” one of the largest crypto-enforcement actions in the province’s history.

The 90 simultaneous raids, executed by the Argentine Federal Police’s Cybercrime Directorate, also yielded nearly 60 million pesos in cash and 80 mobile phones. The prosecutor’s office put the dismantled schemes’ total economic damage at almost 3 billion pesos — roughly $2.4 million at recent rates — across more than 100 separate complaints.

The seizure exceeds the more than $2 million in cryptocurrency confiscated in the 2024 RainbowEx operation, the prosecutor’s office said, making “Fake Coins” the largest crypto bust by the province’s specialized crypto-assets team in recent memory. Coordination ran through the Procuracion General’s Equipo de Asistencia y Coordinacion en Materia de Criptoactivos, led by Dr. Rafael Garcia Borda and Dra. Sabrina Lamperti.

The Three Rings the Prosecutors Took Down

The fraud network was not a single operation but three distinct rings, each working a different angle.

The first targeted retail investors with a fake trading application distributed through the Google Play Store, mimicking a legitimate investment platform. Self-styled “financial advisers” — none registered with Argentina’s securities regulator, the Comision Nacional de Valores (CNV) — walked victims through escalating transfers. “The fact that an application is published in Google’s official store does not guarantee its authenticity or the veracity of the financial operations it promises,” the Procuracion General said in its release.

The second ring, traced through the Azul judicial district, hijacked victims’ WhatsApp accounts to impersonate their contacts and offer black-market dollar purchases. Stolen pesos were converted to USDT through Binance’s peer-to-peer marketplace and forwarded to Binance Pay accounts registered in Venezuela. A single phone IMEI had received more than 100 WhatsApp and WhatsApp Business activation codes — disposable lines used to recontact victims at scale. The Azul branch alone yielded 4,025 USDT seized from offshore accounts.

The bulk of the 8 million USDT came from a third ring centered in San Isidro: a Chinese-origin organization the prosecutor’s office said was building piracy apps laced with “infostealer” malware to harvest passwords and banking credentials. On-chain tracing of the proceeds led to the largest single tranche of the seizure.

What the Bust Says About Argentina’s Crypto Perimeter

Argentina has been a recurring node in Latin American crypto-fraud cases. The country’s Generacion Zoe Ponzi scheme — whose ringleader was arrested in Venezuela last year with a reported $56 million in bitcoin — has dragged through Argentine courts for years. Earlier in 2026, the Federal Police arrested another suspect in a separate crypto-fraud ring the Ministry of Security said had inflicted 1.8 trillion pesos in damage on agribusiness firms.

“Fake Coins” lands at a moment when Argentina’s formal crypto-licensing regime — the CNV’s registry of Proveedores de Servicios de Activos Virtuales, or PSAVs, restructured under General Resolution 1058 in 2025 — has been outpaced by the unregistered “adviser” cottage industry the prosecutor’s office describes. None of the people steering victims toward the fake platforms were registered with the CNV.

The Procuracion General said the 8 million USDT was frozen with the cooperation of private virtual-asset-service providers. The release did not name them or detail whether Binance — whose P2P and Pay rails appear throughout the criminal complaint — was among the cooperating firms.

The 24 detainees face charges including aggravated fraud, illicit association, money laundering, and intellectual-property violations. The Procuracion General has not published the specific charges against each defendant or set a date for the first preliminary hearings.

What’s next: how the seized 8 million USDT is dispositioned, whether toward victim restitution or provincial coffers, will be the next test of Argentina’s still-young crypto-asset enforcement framework.

Bitcoin Price Targets $78K as BTC Holders Defend ‘Strongest Near-Term Support’

0

Bitcoin (BTC) is rebounding from a key on-chain support zone, putting the $78,000 level back in focus for bulls.

Key takeaways:

  • BTC is eyeing a rebound to $78,200, the realized price of BTC held for three to six months.
  • A sustained move above this cost basis could put Bitcoin on track for a push above $100,000 by year-end.

BTC’s short-term holders defend $71,400 cost basis

Bitcoin rebounded roughly 2.5% over the weekend to reach $74,000 on Sunday, with the recovery beginning near $72,500.

The local low came close to the realized price of BTC held for three to six months (orange), a cohort often used to gauge medium-term investor conviction.

BTC realized price by age vs. price. Source: Glassnode

realised

Glassnode data placed that group’s cost basis near $71,400, which analyst Marcus Corvinus described as Bitcoin’s “strongest near-term support.”

“This cohort is still holding profits, creating a strong incentive to defend the level,” Corvinus said in a Sunday post.

The analyst highlighted $78,200 as the next potential upside target for Bitcoin because the level aligns with the realized price of BTC held for three to six months (yellow). Bulls lost the level during the October 2025 market rout.

What happens after Bitcoin breaks above 3m-6m cost basis?

Bitcoin’s rebound above its three-to-six-month holder cost basis (yellow) has historically preceded stronger returns over longer time frames since 2017.

After similar breakouts, BTC has averaged a 2.3% gain over the following 30 days, a 21.9% gain after 90 days, and a 36.6% gain after 180 days.

BTC’s 3m-6m cohort realized price vs. price. Source: Glassnode

From Bitcoin’s current level near $74,000, that would imply upside targets of roughly $75,700 in one month, $90,200 in three months, and $101,100 in six months.

Related: Bitcoin doesn’t need a fresh narrative to reclaim $100K: Analyst

The signal has been more reliable over longer time frames. Bitcoin delivered positive returns in only 54.2% of cases after one month, but that hit rate rose to 66.7% after three months and 79.2% after six months.

Bitcoin bear flag can still spoil upside sentiment

Bitcoin’s rebound is also occurring near the lower boundary of a bear flag, keeping the technical outlook cautious.

The pattern has developed after Bitcoin’s sharp decline from its 2026 highs at around $98,000, with the price now stabilizing near the flag’s rising support trend line.

BTC/USD daily chart. Source: TradingView

A rebound from this area could push BTC toward the flag’s upper boundary near $90,000, a zone that also sits close to the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement level and the three-to-six-month holder cost basis.

That makes $90,000 the key upside target in the coming months if bulls can defend the current support area.

Conversely, a daily close below the lower trend line would risk confirming a breakdown, opening the door to a deeper decline toward the $50,000–$60,000 range, depending on the exact breakdown point.

In that scenario, the recent bounce from holder cost-basis support would look more like a relief move inside a broader downtrend than the start of a sustained recovery.