The Netherlands plans to tax unrealized capital gains on a range of investments, including stocks, bonds and cryptocurrencies, sparking warnings of capital flight.
A majority of lawmakers in the Dutch parliament appear ready to back changes to the country’s Box 3 asset tax regime, which would require investors to pay annual tax on both realized and unrealized gains, even if assets have not been sold, NL Times reported on Tuesday.
The plan follows court rulings that struck down the existing system for relying on assumed, rather than actual, returns. The Tweede Kamer (House of Representatives) debated the proposal again this week, with more than 130 questions put to caretaker State Secretary for Taxation Eugène Heijnen.
While many lawmakers acknowledged flaws in the plan, most signaled they would support it, citing an estimated 2.3 billion euros ($2.7 billion) per year in lost revenue if implementation is delayed further.
Related: Blockrise wins Dutch MiCA license, brings Bitcoin-backed loans to EU businesses
Dutch parties back tax on unrealized gains
Under the proposal, investors in equities, bonds and cryptocurrencies would face annual taxation on paper gains. Heijnen reportedly told parliament that taxing only realized returns would be preferable but is not considered workable by the government before 2028. With public finances under pressure, further delays were ruled out.
Several parties, including People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA), JA21 (Right Answer 2021) and Farmer–Citizen Movement (BBB) Party for Freedom (PVV), are expected to back the bill.
Left-leaning parties such as Democrats 66 (D66), GreenLeft–Labour Party (GroenLinks–PvdA) also support the changes, arguing that taxing unrealized gains is simpler to administer and avoids major budget shortfalls, per the report.
Notably, the revised Box 3 system would be more favorable for real estate investors, allowing deductions for costs and taxation only upon realizing profits, though second homes would face an additional levy for personal use.
Related: Stablecoin panic could upend ECB policy, Dutch central bank governor warns
Dutch unrealized gains tax sparks crypto backlash
The tax plan has triggered sharp criticism from investors and crypto figures, who warn the move could accelerate capital flight.
Prominent Dutch crypto analyst Michaël van de Poppe called the plan “insane,” arguing it would sharply raise annual tax burdens and push residents to leave the country. “No wonder people are leaving the country, and to be fair, it’s completely right to do so,” he wrote.
Source: Michaël van de Poppe
“Taxes on unrealized gains and wealth may be this century’s Boston Tea Party, Reign of Terror, or Bolshevik moment,” another user wrote.
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy
Data products are essential to know how capital markets operate. They enable analysis, transparency, and regulatory oversight by providing structured information on trading activity, ownership patterns, issuers, and market participants.
The sections below outline the main types of data products and services commonly used within the Saudi capital market.
Market Data
Market data consists of historical records of trading activity. This includes prices, traded volumes, and broader market movements captured over time.
These datasets are used to analyse liquidity conditions, assess market trends, and study behaviour across different market cycles.
Investor and Shareholder Data
Investor and shareholder data focuses on ownership structures and participation patterns. It helps identify how different investor segments engage with the market and how shareholding profiles evolve.
This data supports transparency, issuer monitoring, and participation analysis.
Issuer and Listed Company Data
Issuer data relates to listed companies and their activity within the market. It includes structured information on issuers, disclosures, and historical company-level data.
These datasets are used for company analysis, reporting, and broader market research.
Market Participant and Member Data
Market participant data provides aggregated insights into the activity of brokers, members, and other intermediaries. It highlights participation levels and operational patterns across the market.
This information supports market structure assessment and performance monitoring.
Value-Added and Standardised Data Sets
Value-added data sets are curated to improve usability and consistency. They are cleaned, standardised, and structured to align with Saudi capital market frameworks.
Such datasets reduce manual data preparation and support efficient, comparable analysis.
Data Access and Delivery Services
Capital market data is increasingly delivered through centralized platforms that enable structured and controlled access. These services focus on consistent data definitions, reliability, and role-based availability.
Wamid DataHub operates as one such centralized platform, providing access to Saudi capital market data products through a single environment. By consolidating multiple datasets, Wamid DataHub supports standardised data access for a wide range of market participants.
Conclusion
Data products and services form a critical foundation for analysis, transparency, and oversight within the Saudi capital market. By covering market activity, ownership patterns, issuer information, and participant behaviour, these datasets enable consistent research and informed assessment across different market roles.
Centralised access models further support this ecosystem by improving data consistency and reducing reliance on fragmented sources. Platforms such as Wamid DataHub contribute to this approach by bringing multiple Saudi capital market data products into a single, structured environment, supporting standardised access for a broad range of market participants.
Centralised access models further support this ecosystem by improving data consistency and reducing reliance on fragmented sources. Platforms such as Wamid DataHub contribute to this approach by bringing multiple Saudi capital market data products into a single, structured environment, supporting standardised access for a broad range of market participants.
Centralised access models further support this ecosystem by improving data consistency and reducing reliance on fragmented sources. Platforms such as Wamid DataHub contribute to this approach by bringing multiple Saudi capital market data products into a single, structured environment, supporting standardised access for a broad range of market participants.
Bitcoin backers have minimized claims that fears around quantum computing being a threat to the cryptocurrency sooner than expected are dragging on its price.
Glassnode lead analyst James Check said in an X post on Thursday that linking Bitcoin’s price to quantum computing fears “is akin to blaming market manipulation for red candles, and declining exchange balances for green ones.”
Check argued that while quantum computing may be “keeping some capital away” from Bitcoin (BTC), the weakness in Bitcoin’s price performance has been driven far more by heavy selling from long-term holders.
“Bitcoin saw sell-side from HODLers in 2025, which would have killed every prior bull thrice over, and then once more,” Check said.
TradFi worries over quantum threat
Quantum computing uses quantum bits, or qubits, to process information in a way that’s fundamentally different from traditional computers. Crypto developers have debated whether it could pose a threat to some of the cryptographic methods used to secure blockchains.
The topic has been discussed for several years, but has gained recent attention as some traditional finance executives have voiced concerns about what recent advances in quantum computing could mean for Bitcoin’s long-term price performance.
Jefferies strategist Christopher Wood removed Bitcoin from his “Greed & Fear” model portfolio last week, citing concerns that new advances in quantum computing could undermine the cryptocurrency’s long-term security.
Source: Smiffy Big Coin
Bitcoin author Vijay Boyapati said he was “highly skeptical the price action in BTC is explained by QC [quantum computing], notwithstanding there may be some investment notes that have picked up that narrative.”
However, other Bitcoiners are more certain that it is the primary catalyst for Bitcoin’s price action. Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter said on Wednesday that Bitcoin’s “mysterious” underperformance is “due to quantum” and is “the only story that matters this year.”
“The market is speaking and the devs aren’t listening,” Carter said.
Real Vision chief crypto researcher Jamie Coutts said on Wednesday that “quantum risk doesn’t move with price, but the gap does.”
Related: Bitcoin offers ‘no haven’ from Trump’s Greenland dreams
“As Bitcoin’s price rises, confidence rises — and the willingness to push through disruptive, precautionary upgrades falls. The system feels safest exactly when it is least incentivised to prepare,” Coutts said.
Despite bullish forecasts, Bitcoin ended 2025 around 6.33% lower than it started the year, dropping from $93,425 to $87,508.
Some had predicted Bitcoin would reach highs of $250,000, but the cryptocurrency reached a peak of above $126,000 in October.
Bitcoin has traded flat over the past day at around $89,500, according to CoinMarketCap.
Magazine: The critical reason you should never ask ChatGPT for legal advice
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy
Binance is preparing to revive stock trading on its platform, revisiting a business line it shut down in 2021 after regulatory scrutiny, according to a report by The Information.
Binance launched tokenized equities in April 2021, starting with Tesla and later adding stocks including Coinbase, Strategy, Microsoft, and Apple. The service was discontinued by July after regulators in the UK and Germany questioned whether the products complied with securities laws.
The renewed push comes as interest in tokenized equities accelerates across crypto and traditional finance. OKX is also exploring stock-linked products, its global managing partner Haider Rafique told The Information.
In the US, the push to bring securities on-chain is emerging as an increasingly attractive business as both the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq seek regulatory approval to launch tokenized stock offerings.
Onchain platforms are already moving to fill that demand. Ondo Finance currently operates a global markets platform offering more than 250 tokenized stocks and ETFs. Another provider, xStocks, also offers onchain exposure to major equities across decentralized and centralized trading venues, underscoring growing investor interest in tokenized stocks.
Some outlined the connection between lower fees on mainnet since Fusaka and increased attacks.
Ethereum mainnet is seeing an unusually high spike in activity, even surpassing metrics across Layer 2s, which were initially designed to be more scalable alternatives to the network.
But researchers caution that the headline numbers around active addresses and transaction count are being distorted by dust attacks and so-called “address-poisoning” campaigns rather than organic activity on the network.
In a Jan. 22 post on X, Token Terminal flagged that Ethereum’s Layer 1 chain “outranks all leading L2s in terms of daily active addresses.”
Daily active addresses on Ethereum (top) vs Daily transactions on Ethereum (bottom). Source: TokenTerminal, BitInfoCharts
Last Friday, Jan. 16, the network reached 1.2 million active daily addresses, according to Token Terminal data, up from a previous high of 589,000 daily active addresses in July.
The number of transactions on the network also reached an all-time high that day of about 2.8 million transactions, per BitInfoCharts data. In the past 24 hours, the network has seen about 2.5 million transactions.
The recent surge in mainnet activity overshadows previous cycle activity peaks such as those connected with CryptoKitties, DeFi summer, and the 2021-2022 NFT market boom.
Stablecoins Are Everywhere
But independent crypto journalist and on-chain researcher Andrey Sergeenkov says a different story is hidden behind the spike. In a recent report, Sergeenkov found that automated poisoning contracts have been sending out tiny stablecoin amounts of less than $1 to millions of addresses, stealing over $740,000 worth of crypto.
The scam works by sending tiny amounts of crypto to addresses that look nearly identical to the ones most often used by the potential victim, with the goal of tricking them into later sending funds to the lookalike, scam address.
“I calculated how many users received less than a dollar as their first stablecoin transaction, and it turned out 67% of addresses fit this pattern. 3.86M out of 5.78M addresses received dust as their first transaction,” Sergeenkov writes.
He says the spam attacks across Ethereum became possible “thanks to the Fusaka upgrade, which made spam transactions cheap enough to be profitable.” Analysts at American multinational investment bank Citi reportedly echoed the concern, saying in a report this week the activity on Ethereum highly resembles “address poisoning scam campaigns.”
Sergeenkov concluded that what developers are doing is “reckless experimentation at users’ expense disguised as a revolution where ordinary people bear all the risks.”
‘They Need to Fix Fundamental Problems’
However, some pushed back against Sergeenkov’s findings, calling the researcher’s characterization of Fusaka a “crazy take” and arguing that security is “usually a tradeoff against usability.”
Speaking with The Defiant, Sergeenkov rejected the idea that the issue comes down to unavoidable tradeoffs. Referencing his own “reckless experimentation” characterization, Sergeenkov told The Defiant:
“If anything, I’m being too gentle. To experiment means you don’t know the outcome. Developers KNEW about the effect their upgrade would cause and chose to sacrifice security for nice headlines anyway,” explaining further that the connection between lower fees and increased attacks “wasn’t just predictable, it was documented.”
Sergeenkov also said portraying the changes as user experience improvements masks the real impact on users.
“Before attracting new users with low fees, they need to fix fundamental problems first. If they’re unable to fix them, maybe they should declare the Ethereum experiment a failure and take up knitting instead of promoting themselves as a ‘Trillion Dollar Security’ replacement for existing financial infrastructure,” he added.
Security Tradeoffs
The Fusaka upgrade went live in December last year, raising the block gas limit on Ethereum and introducing other features for Layer 2s. Its primary aim was to support scalability and long‑term growth rather than to directly cut Layer 1 transaction fees. The developers specifically noted in the roadmap for the upgrade:
“This upgrade does not lower gas fees on L1, at least not directly. The main focus is more blob space for rollup data, therefore lowering fees on layer 2. This might have some side effects on L1 fee market but no significant change is expected.”
Average transaction fees on Ethereum (in USD) since February 2025. Source: BitInfoCharts
But L1 fees did decrease following the Fusaka upgrade, albeit only slightly. Data from BitInfoCharts shows that the average Ethereum transaction fee fell from around $0.50 in late November to about $0.20 after the upgrade went live in December.
Gonçalo Magalhães, head of security at blockchain bug bounty firm Immunefi, pointed out in commentary shared with The Defiant that while Ethereum upgrades like Fusaka and Pectra “are pushing UX forward by removing friction,” they also “make it easier for users to inadvertently sign something they don’t fully understand.”
Hence, as Magalhães argues, the industry needs “more adoption of naming systems like ENS, because human-readable identifiers make lookalike address attacks harder.”
For Sergeenkov, the fix needs to come from Ethereum at the infrastructure level, before the network scales to billions of users, per the Ethereum Foundation’s stated goals. He told The Defiant:
“I’m not claiming we need to implement 100x fees. I’m saying that before lowering fees and scaling the blockchain, we need to solve the most basic infrastructure problems that enable dust attacks, social engineering attacks, MEV bots, and the ease with which attackers launder stolen funds.”
The on-chain researcher also pushed back against the notion that wallets should bear the responsibility and implement UI changes to address these issues, clarifying to The Defiant, “Fixing the UX of wallets and educating users are band-aids that didn’t work even when the community was just a group of tech enthusiasts.”
The Defiant reached out to the Ethereum Foundation about the network activity spike and the implications of Sergeenkov’s and Citi’s findings, but has yet to receive commentary by press time.
Bitget, the world’s largest Universal Exchange (UEX), announced that Bitget TradFi has reached a new all-time high of $4 billion in daily trading volume on January 21. The rapid acceleration highlights a clear shift in trader behavior, as crypto-native users increasingly turn to traditional assets to navigate global market volatility within a familiar environment.
The pace of growth is notable. After Bitget TradFi first crossed $2 billion in daily volume on January 8, activity doubled in two weeks, reflecting strong and sustained demand for on-platform access to metals, commodities, indices, and FX. Rather than treating TradFi as a side feature, users are integrating it directly into their trading strategies, moving fluidly between crypto and global markets in response to real-time events.
Gold CFD (XAUUSD) continues to dominate activity, ranking as the most actively traded product on Bitget TradFi. The data suggests that traders are using gold as a fast-moving, event-driven instrument rather than a passive store of value. Spikes in volume align closely with macro headlines, reinforcing the role of gold as a tactical vehicle for short-term positioning during periods of uncertainty.
Bitget TradFi was built for this environment, allowing users to trade global assets with crypto-level speed and flexibility, turning macro events into immediate opportunities. Within a single account, traders can move from Bitcoin to gold, from altcoins to indices, without changing platforms or workflows. The result is a unified trading experience designed for event-driven markets.
The milestone reflects Bitget’s broader UEX vision, where digital assets and traditional markets converge under one roof. As crypto traders increasingly look beyond on-chain volatility to global macro signals, Bitget TradFi is emerging as the bridge that makes those shifts actionable in real time. The surge in daily trading volume exemplifies this shift, demonstrating how the demand for multi-asset trading is reshaping the way crypto-native users engage with the world’s markets.
About Bitget
Bitget is the world’s largest Universal Exchange (UEX), serving over 125 million users and offering access to over 2M crypto tokens, 100+ tokenized stocks, ETFs, commodities, FX, and precious metals such as gold. The ecosystem is committed to helping users trade smarter with its AI agent, which co-pilots trade execution. Bitget is driving crypto adoption through strategic partnerships with LALIGA and MotoGP™. Aligned with its global impact strategy, Bitget has joined hands with UNICEF to support blockchain education for 1.1 million people by 2027. Bitget currently leads in the tokenized TradFi market, providing the industry’s lowest fees and highest liquidity across 150 regions worldwide.
For more information, visit:Website | Twitter| Telegram | LinkedIn | Discord
For media inquiries, please contact: media@bitget.com
Risk Warning: Digital asset prices are subject to fluctuation and may experience significant volatility. Investors are advised to only allocate funds they can afford to lose. The value of any investment may be impacted, and there is a possibility that financial objectives may not be met, nor the principal investment recovered. Independent financial advice should always be sought, and personal financial experience and standing carefully considered. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Bitget accepts no liability for any potential losses incurred. Nothing contained herein should be construed as financial advice. For further information, please refer to ourTerms of Use.
Source: Bitget
This article “Bitget TradFi Doubles to $4B in Daily Volume” was first published on AlexaBlockchain. Read the complete article here: https://alexablockchain.com/bitget-tradfi-doubles-to-4b-in-daily-volume/
Submit Your Blockchain and Crypto Press Release here.
Disclaimer: This is a press release, provided by the company/ company representative. AlexaBlockchain does not endorse, guarantee, or accept responsibility for the content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials presented in this publication. Readers are advised to conduct their own due diligence before taking any actions related to the company mentioned herein. AlexaBlockchain expressly disclaims any liability for damages or losses, whether direct or indirect, arising from or related to the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services referenced in this press release.
Image Credits: Bitget, Shutterstock, Canva, Wiki Commons
The FBI arrested former Olympic snowboarder Ryan James Wedding, who’s accused of running a crypto-backed cocaine trafficking operation.
Prosecutors say his network used Tether (USDT) to move drug proceeds across borders.
Wedding is now being brought to the U.S. from Mexico to face trial.
The FBI announced Friday that it has arrested Ryan James Wedding, a wanted fugitive and former Olympic snowboarder accused of operating a drug-smuggling empire backed by crypto.
Wedding, a Canadian national, was accused in 2024 by the U.S. Department of Justice of managing a cocaine trafficking operation running from Colombia, through Mexico, and into the United States. Wedding and his business partners also orchestrated numerous murders as part of that operation, the prosecutors alleged.
The DOJ and the Treasury Department have claimed that Wedding and his employees relied on the stablecoin Tether (USDT) to fuel their activities. Drug runners would use QR codes to receive payment for cocaine in USDT, the complaint against Wedding alleged.
The former snowboarder, who represented Canada at the 2002 Winter Olympics, was long thought to be hiding in Mexico. After more than a year of pursuit, Wedding was arrested in the country last night, FBI Director Kash Patel said Friday.
“This is a huge day for a safer North America, and the world, and a message that those who break our laws and harm our citizens will be brought to justice,” Patel said.
Thanks to President Trump’s leadership and commitment to global law enforcement – as of this morning, the DOJ/FBI officially apprehended our SIXTH Top Ten Most Wanted Fugitive within the last year. Thank you to @AGPamBondi for her relentless pursuit of justice, the US Attorney’s… pic.twitter.com/fnSP4IXQRI
The FBI director added that Wedding is currently being transported by the FBI to the United States to face trial.
In late 2024, the DOJ seized one ton of cocaine, $3.2 million worth of crypto, and multiple firearms connected to Wedding and his alleged drug running scheme.
Shortly thereafter, the Treasury Department sanctioned the ex-Olympian, several of his associates, and related entities. Those included a Toronto jewelry business which the Treasury Department claimed was used as a front to launder crypto earned from cocaine sales.
Capturing Wedding, one of the FBI’s top 10 most wanted fugitives, has long been an agency priority. The FBI first offered a $10 million reward for information leading to the fugitive’s arrest. That amount was later raised to $15 million.
It’s not yet clear if information from the bounty program led to Wedding’s arrest, or if the cash reward will be paid. An FBI spokesperson did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s request for comment on the matter.
Daily Debrief Newsletter
Start every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.
Tether Gold and Paxos Gold remain the largest onchain gold tokens, as the tokenized commodity sector grows.
Tokenized gold has surpassed $4 billion in market value as spot gold reached a new all-time high this week, reflecting growing interest in onchain commodities amid global market uncertainty.
Tether Gold (XAUT) has about $2.5 billion in total assets, while Paxos Gold (PAXG) stands near $1.99 billion, according to DeFiLlama data. Both tokens are designed to track the price of an ounce of physical gold. PAXG saw about $533 million in 24-hour trading volume, while XAUT recorded around $266 million, per CoinGecko.
The milestone comes as gold prices pushed higher this week, trading around $4,986 per ounce on Friday. This is up about 1.6% on the day, according to GoldPrice.org.
PAXG Chart
Tokenized commodities overall also continue to expand. RWA.xyz data showed the tokenized commodities market at roughly $4.88 billion, up more than 22% over the past 30 days, with monthly transfer volume above $7 billion. Notably, Tether Gold and Paxos Gold together hold roughly 86% of the market share.
The growth highlights a broader trend of real-world assets (RWAs) moving onchain, as crypto-native traders and TradFi investors look for ways to access familiar assets on blockchain rails.
The rise in tokenized gold also comes as investors continue to rotate into safe-haven assets amid broader market volatility. Bitcoin, for example, is currently trading at $90,750, up 2% over the past 24 hours but still down 4% over the past week and 14% over the past year.
On TradeXYZ, which is powered by Hyperliquid, the GOLD-USDC perp contract posted about $76 million in 24-hour trading volume and roughly $60 million in open interest as of Jan. 23.
Björn Schmidtke, CEO of Aurelion, said in comments shared with The Defiant that gold’s recent rally is not a coincidence. “It reflects a world that is becoming more fragmented and less predictable by the day,” he said.
Schmidtke also said tokenization could address risks in traditional gold exposure. “Most investors don’t own gold; they own claims on gold,” he said, adding that tokenized, fully allocated gold can “restore certainty around ownership.”
This comes as big institutions, including Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, have turned more bullish on gold. Goldman recently raised its year-end forecast for gold to $5,400 per ounce, according to Bloomberg, more than 8% above current levels.
The Ethereum Foundation (EF), a nonprofit organization that supports Ethereum’s development, is turning its long running post quantum research into a public engineering push, forming a dedicated Post Quantum team and calling the effort a top strategic priority for the network.
EF researcher Justin Drake said the new group will be led by Thomas Coratger, with support from Emile, who Drake described as a key talent behind “leanVM.”
Drake framed leanVM as a core part of Ethereum’s broader approach to post quantum security, arguing that timelines are accelerating and that Ethereum should move into a build phase rather than keep work in the background.
Today marks an inflection in the Ethereum Foundation’s long-term quantum strategy.
We’ve formed a new Post Quantum (PQ) team, led by the brilliant Thomas Coratger (@tcoratger). Joining him is Emile, one of the world-class talents behind leanVM. leanVM is the cryptographic…
The announcement comes as crypto markets have become more sensitive to quantum risk headlines, even if the practical threat remains a longer dated problem.
Quantum computing uses new types of processors that could one day break today’s encryption much faster than normal computers. Blockchain developers worry it could eventually expose wallet keys, forcing networks to upgrade cryptography well before that risk becomes real.
The bigger issue for large networks is not a single breakthrough moment but the time it takes to ship a safe transition, update wallets and move users onto new formats without breaking daily usage.
Drake outlined several near term steps. A bi weekly developer session focused on post quantum transactions is expected to start next month, led by Antonio Sanso. The agenda is aimed at user facing defenses, including dedicated cryptographic tools inside the protocol, account abstraction paths and longer term work on aggregating transaction signatures using leanVM.
EF is also putting money behind cryptography research. Drake said it is announcing a $1 million Poseidon Prize to harden the Poseidon hash function and pointed to another $1 million post quantum initiative called the Proximity Prize.
On the engineering side, Drake said multi client post quantum consensus dev networks are already running, with multiple teams participating and weekly interoperability calls to coordinate.
Ethereum plans more community work as well. Drake said the EF will host a post quantum event in October and a post quantum day in late March ahead of EthCC, alongside education efforts that include a video series and enterprise focused materials.
Others in the ecosystem echoed the urgency. Pantera Capital XX Franklin Bi argued that traditional finance could take years to upgrade systems, while blockchains may be able to coordinate a full stack software transition faster.
The lawsuit came days after the president threatened on social media to sue the banking giant for debanking him in the weeks after his supporters attacked the US Capitol in 2021.
US President Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit in Florida state court against JPMorgan, claiming that the banking giant terminated accounts connected to the president and his businesses “without warning or provocation.”
According to a Thursday Bloomberg report, Trump filed a complaint in the Miami-Dade County state court, seeking $5 billion in damages from JPMorgan and its CEO, Jamie Dimon. The complaint was not available on the court’s public docket at the time of publication.
The lawsuit accused JPMorgan of trade libel and breach of implied covenant of good faith, and Dimon of violating Florida’s deceptive trade practices law. A spokesperson for the bank said the lawsuit had no merit and JPMorgan “does not close accounts for political or religious reasons.”
One of Trump’s main arguments for the debanking lawsuit, according to a Jan. 17 social media post, was around claims that the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol by his supporters was the “correct” action, given that the 2020 election was “rigged.” Trump lost the election by 74 electoral votes to former President Joe Biden.
Saturday social media post threatening lawsuit against JPMorgan. Source: Donald Trump
Dimon has previously denied allegations of debanking for political or religious reasons from others in the crypto industry. In December, the CEO said “we debank people who are Democrats. We debank people who are Republicans. We have debanked different religious folks. Never was that for that reason.”
Related: Crypto debanking is not over until Jan 2026: Caitlin Long
In August, Trump signed an executive order going after “politicized or unlawful debanking” by ordering US regulators to look into claims and develop measures to prevent debanking in the future. Some Republican lawmakers in Congress have also called for the market structure bill under consideration in the Senate to address the issue.
Republicans bring up debanking claims in policies, proposed laws
Even before Biden left office in January 2025, Republican lawmakers and government officials had been pushing for investigations or policies addressing claims of debanking related to the crypto industry.
The claims were dubbed “Operation Chokepoint 2.0” by many in the crypto industry, citing an orchestrated effort by the US government to remove access to traditional banking for those involved in digital assets. The movement gained momentum online in 2024 after more than 30 tech and crypto executives went public with their debanking claims.
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy