Flying Tulip Adds Withdrawal Circuit Breaker After DeFi Exploits

Share This Post

Flying Tulip, a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform founded by DeFi developer Andre Cronje, has added a circuit breaker that can delay or queue withdrawals during abnormal outflows, as April DeFi losses climbed amid a string of major exploits. 

According to Flying Tulip’s documentation, the mechanism is designed to slow funds leaving the protocol if outflow capacity is exceeded, giving the team time to investigate suspicious activity and limiting how much an attacker could drain in a worst-case scenario.

Flying Tulip said the circuit breaker works differently across products. In the first version of the circuit breaker, used in its Perpetual PUT product, withdrawals can revert and users must retry later. In the second version, used in Flying Tulip’s stable asset and settlement currency, ftUSD, withdrawals are queued and become claimable after a delay instead of being rejected outright.

Flying Tulip said the circuit breaker is built with a “fail-open” design, meaning transactions would still be allowed if the safety mechanism itself were to malfunction. The platform said users can track the feature through a dedicated status page. 

The design adds a new layer of protection for the DeFi platform as recent industry exploits exposed risks that extend beyond smart contract code. 

Circuit breaker definition. Source: Flying Tulip

Recent exploits put broader security failures in focus

The added attention to outflow controls comes as recent exploits underscored vulnerabilities tied to signers, infrastructure and collateral design rather than only smart contract bugs. 

Amir Hajian, a digital assets researcher at trading firm Keyrock, said the biggest failures in April were increasingly linked to operational and infrastructure weaknesses, including compromised multisigs, configuration flaws and key leaks. 

The new mechanism deployed by Flying Tulip is designed to slow abnormal outflows and give the protocol time to respond when losses stem from failures outside of the smart contract itself. 

Related: Phishing, deepfakes, supply chain attacks to fuel 2026’s biggest crypto hacks: CertiK

Hajian highlighted April’s DeFi losses, which reached over $600 million in the first 18 days of the month, with two incidents accounting for 95% of the damage. 

On April 2, Solana-based decentralized exchange Drift Protocol suffered an exploit, with estimated losses at about $280 million. On April 19, liquid restaking platform Kelp was exploited for about $293 million, prompting lending protocol Aave to freeze rsETH markets on V3 and V4. 

Magazine: 53 DeFi projects infiltrated, 50M NEO tokens could be ‘given back’: Asia Express

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.

Related Posts

US Republicans Release Final CLARITY Act Text

Senate Republicans on Sunday released revised text of the...

Fed rate hike is about Wall Street, not inflation, says economist

Goldman Sachs late Friday became the last of the...

Circle's $400M Tazapay deal buys emerging market links that take ‘years to build’

Stablecoins' “next battleground is in emerging markets,” one expert...

Revolut says customer data exposed through fake government email

Passports, selfies and financial transaction histories of some customers...

Anthropic CEO calls for AI race to slow down citing safety. Musk and OpenAI's Altman agrees

Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Elon Musk...