- OKX surveyed 1,000 active U.S. crypto traders and found over 65% have used onchain tools to earn yield on stablecoins.
- Over 25% of respondents said they use stablecoin-yield strategies regularly.
A majority of active U.S. crypto traders are already using blockchain-based tools to earn yield on stablecoins, according to a new survey from crypto exchange OKX, complicating one of the banking industry’s central arguments in Washington’s ongoing fight over digital-asset regulation.
The survey of 1,000 active U.S. crypto traders found that more than 65% had used onchain tools to generate yield on stablecoins, while more than one in four said they do so regularly. The findings suggest that the behavior banks have warned could trigger a destabilizing outflow of deposits from the traditional financial system is, at least among active crypto users, already entrenched rather than hypothetical.
That matters because stablecoin rewards remain one of the most contested issues in U.S. crypto policymaking. The GENIUS Act, enacted in July 2025, established a federal framework for payment stablecoins and bars permitted issuers from paying interest or yield to holders solely for holding, using or retaining those tokens. But banks and trade groups have argued that the law left room for intermediaries such as crypto exchanges to continue offering stablecoin-linked rewards, creating what they describe as a loophole that could intensify competition for deposits.
That debate has only sharpened in recent months. Earlier this year, White House officials were pulled into the dispute after banks pressed lawmakers to tighten the rules, warning that exchange-based yield programs could lure funds away from insured deposits.
In March, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency proposed implementation rules that would broaden scrutiny of arrangements involving “related third parties” offering interest or yield to payment stablecoin holders, a sign regulators are now examining ways to prevent issuers from indirectly doing what the statute bars them from doing directly.
Against that backdrop, OKX’s survey presents a market already operating ahead of the policy debate. Among the respondents, stablecoin yield use appears to have moved well beyond experimentation. Providing liquidity to stablecoin pools was the most popular strategy, attracting nearly 40% of respondents, followed by staking on centralized platforms at just over 36%. Nearly one in five said they used DeFi lending protocols.
The data points to a user base that is neither new nor casual. Nearly two-thirds of respondents began actively trading before 2023, according to OKX, meaning most of the sample had already traded through multiple market cycles, including the 2022 collapse in crypto prices and the market recovery that followed. For that group, stablecoin yield appears to be less a speculative side bet than an established part of how they manage idle capital in the crypto ecosystem.
Even so, the survey suggests that adoption has not resolved crypto’s long-running usability problem. 29% of respondents said security risks and scams were the single biggest barrier keeping them from going further onchain. Another 25% pointed to the fear of making irreversible mistakes, while 23% cited the difficulty of managing multiple applications.
These findings show a contradiction that has become more visible as crypto matures: users want ownership and control, but many still find the onchain experience too fragmented or risky to navigate with confidence. In the OKX survey, 51% said they preferred to manage most aspects of trading themselves while using some automation, and 38% said they wanted full responsibility. Only 2% said they would be comfortable handing over complete control.
That does not mean traders are rejecting intermediation altogether. Rather, the survey suggests they are open to delegating specific operational functions while keeping strategic decisions for themselves. Best-price routing was the task respondents were most comfortable handing to an exchange, selected by 24% of respondents. Scam detection followed at 21%, then execution-timing optimization at 16% and bridging at 12%. Just 1% said they would prefer to delegate nothing.
The pattern reflects a more nuanced version of crypto’s self-custody ethos. Traders still want agency over capital allocation and market direction, but they appear increasingly willing to let platforms handle the error-prone and security-sensitive plumbing underneath. That division of labor is likely to favor exchanges and other crypto platforms trying to position themselves as simplified gateways into decentralized markets rather than as pure centralized venues.
OKX’s survey supports that view. More than one-third of respondents said they expected centralized exchanges to be their primary gateway to onchain markets, while only 16% said they would mainly access those markets directly through DeFi platforms. When asked about a model that combines centralized exchange infrastructure with onchain execution, 90% of respondents expressed positive interest.
That preference lands at a moment when regulators are still working through how much responsibility centralized platforms should bear in crypto’s next phase. The OCC’s proposed GENIUS Act rules, published this month, would not only restate the act’s yield prohibition for issuers but also create a presumption against structures that use affiliates or third parties to pass rewards through to stablecoin holders. Legal analyses of the proposal say the agency is trying to prevent evasion of the statute while clarifying custody, reserve and operational requirements before the law fully takes effect.
Banks, meanwhile, continue to frame the issue as one of systemic competition. According to Standard Chartered estimate, U.S. banks could lose as much as $500 billion in deposits to stablecoins by 2028, with smaller lenders potentially hit hardest.
Banking groups have used those concerns to argue that Congress should close the rewards loophole, while crypto firms counter that restricting intermediaries would freeze out a use case that traders are already demanding.
The OKX survey does not settle that broader argument. It does, however, show that for active U.S. crypto traders, stablecoin yield is already part of routine market behavior. The bigger constraint may not be demand, but the mechanics of how safely and simply users can access those returns.
For exchanges, that creates both an opportunity and a policy risk. The opportunity is clear: traders appear willing to use centralized platforms as trusted entry points into onchain finance, especially for functions tied to execution, security and fraud prevention. The risk is that Washington may yet decide those same platforms have become too effective at delivering bank-like rewards through crypto rails.
As lawmakers and regulators wrestle with that question, the market may already be giving its answer.
The article “Banks Warned of Deposit Flight. OKX Survey Shows Stablecoin Yield Is Already Here” was first published on AlexaBlockchain. Read the complete article here: https://alexablockchain.com/OKX-Survey-Shows-Stablecoin-Yield-Is-Already-Here/
Read Also: MoneyGram, Pairpoint and eToro Back Midnight’s Privacy Blockchain Before Mainnet
Disclaimer: The information provided on AlexaBlockchain is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read complete disclaimer here.
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Canva, Wiki Commons
